Прямые и винтовые лестницы получили отдельную модель, инструменты редактора, безопасную межэтажную навигацию, вычитание из чистой площади и плоское отображение в 2.5D.
Issue: #663
User-Visible: yes
План уходил base64 в WebSocket-кадре: файл больше ~3 МиБ давал кадр больше
4 МиБ, HA закрывал сокет до обработчика, и обещанные 8 МБ были недостижимы.
- бэкенд: HouseplanPlanUploadView (POST /api/houseplan/plans/upload), потоковый
предел MAX_PLAN_BYTES (read_bounded), общий writer store_plan_upload для view
и ws_plan_set (контракт WS без изменений);
- карточка: stagePlanFile/uploadPlanFile/renderPlanBackdropGuard в
backdrop-pick.ts для обоих рантаймов; PlanFilePayload хранит Blob вместо b64;
SVG больше предела — тост при выборе, растр — диалог #39 только с уменьшенной
копией, копия больше предела не попадает в staging, 413 называет предел;
- i18n toast.plan_too_large, backdrop.over_limit_body (en/ru/de/fr);
USER-GUIDE ru/en, CHANGELOG ru/en, docs/testing-notes (#617);
- тесты: test/plan-upload-limit.test.mjs, tests_backend/test_plan_upload.py,
test_ha_upload.py (#617), smoke_plan_upload_limit.mjs; три смока переведены
с b64/plan/set на blob/fetchWithAuth; мутанты plan-upload-*;
- база монолита: hostRefs +3 (общий хелпер плана вместо двух копий в рантаймах,
новый тост уменьшенной копии).
Issue: #617
User-Visible: yes
Apply re-validated the preview token after both halves were durable, so a
TTL that lapsed during the write, or an eviction by a newer preview of the
same user, answered "preview expired" for a plan that was already replaced
and withheld both update events. The token is now simply spent after the
commit; validity is decided once, on entry under write_lock.
Route runs dropped by drop_unknown_routes never reached the store unless a
marker happened to be orphaned in the same pass; an idle robot kept them in
memory only and a restart brought them back. The drop now happens under
_refresh_lock, leaves with the orphan transaction or with an immediate
write of its own, and rolls back like #335 when the store refuses.
Tests: HA harness for both apply races and a live config/set route drop,
recorder stubs for the four durability cases; five mutants caught by the
standard runner.
Issue: #495
User-Visible: yes
Tooling: requirements_test.txt becomes the single source of backend CI
dependencies; pyproject.toml configures ruff (E/F/B/I, E501 excluded by
decision) and mypy strict for a grow-only allowlist of six pure modules
(junction_limits annotated to pass). The 42 substantive ruff findings
are fixed — the B023 loop-variable closures bind their variables as
parameter defaults instead of hiding behind noqa, and every remaining
noqa carries a reason (guarded by a test).
Errors: const.ERROR_CODES / ERROR_CODE_FAMILIES formalise the stable
contract; the scanner test proves every emitted code across BOTH paths
(send_error literals; class attrs, literal and variable-passed
MarkerControlError codes, f-string families) is registered and has a
localized message — 22 missing backup.error.* keys added in all four
languages. invalid_passage_fields / invalid_partition_opening_jamb_margin
ship structured JSON details (legacy format read-compat for one beta),
and _errText renders code-first: unknown codes localize, raw English
messages go to the console.
CI: the backend job lints with ruff, refuses a silently skipped HA
harness (import + collect threshold), measures branch coverage over
pure+harness, fails below the committed baseline and uploads
coverage.xml. quality_scale: docs-troubleshooting/examples honestly
done, test-coverage/strict-typing carry staged progress.
User-Visible: yes
Issue: #42
#340/#356 made expected_rev mandatory for config/set and layout/set over a
non-empty store — an honest protection the release notes sold only as a
stale-tab guard. A third-party script writing plans directly cannot infer
from "protects from stale tabs" that it must now read the revision first.
Both changelogs gain an explicit breaking-for-external-writers entry with
the read-then-write recipe; ARCHITECTURE.md's WS contract section extends
the #340 paragraph with the cycle external clients must follow (get rev →
send expected_rev → on conflict re-read and retry); and both conflict
messages now carry the actionable hint for scripts — "include expected_rev
from houseplan/config/get / layout/get" — alongside the tab-oriented
"reload" advice. The backend tests pin only the "revision is required"
substring and stay untouched.
Issue: #368
User-Visible: yes
The owner's decision (2026-08-28): optimize is one of the two commands a
client can use to write arbitrary geometry, so it validates its candidate
against the stored document exactly as config/set does — inheritance counted
per rule (repairing a legacy plan with violations still passes; #329 AC10
already proves an honest optimization adds none, so the gate is a no-op for
legitimate flows), while a crafted payload is refused with the stable
junction_limit_<rule> code the except list has been ready for since #329.
The call lives inside the existing executor function, and a successful
optimize refreshes rt.junction_baseline with the candidate's counts so the
next config/set inherits from the cache (#330 §4.2 symmetry).
Import and backup restore stay OUTSIDE the gate on purpose — #329 §3
promises a restore is never blocked. The module docstring stops promising
more than the code does, and spec #329 §5 records the perimeter and the
trade-off explicitly: a crafted import can persist violations, but they are
inherited, never legalised as new ones.
HA tests pin AC1 (crafted spike refused, stored config and rev
byte-unchanged), AC2 (echo-optimize of a stored plan that already carries a
violation passes) and AC3 (the follow-up config/set takes its baseline from
the cache — observed through a recording wrapper). The
junction-limit-optimize-unguarded mutant turns AC1 red through the
backend-test-guard convention.
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
Six cuts, zero verdict changes (spec §3; equivalence pinned by units, the
parity suite and the smokes):
- §4.1 the CPU chain of ws_config_set and ws_plan_optimize runs in the
executor; write_lock still serialises writes, only the HA event loop is
freed (2.8 s of blocking per 576-atom write before).
- §4.2 the stored document's violation counts are cached on the runtime by
rev (store.py junction_baseline); a repeated write never re-judges
`previous`. validate_junction_limits takes baseline_counts and returns the
candidate's counts to cache after a successful save.
- §4.3 П3 builds its node index once per check in both mirrors
(289→11 ms TS, 285→~50 ms py).
- §4.5 П4 uses a bucket grid with the threshold as cell size in both
mirrors (104→19 ms TS, 372→44 ms py); pair enumeration switches to
lexicographic order — same verdict set, equivalence pinned against a
brute-force oracle on cell borders.
- §4.6 a document already carrying the current catalogue is judged as-is:
a no-op re-migration cost 815 ms py / 69 ms TS. Legacy documents migrate
exactly as before (the #329 H1 test stays green).
- §4.7 П5 shares one junction-topology pass per check and pays the masonry
union only when multi-wall nodes exist — and the resize path hands over
the preflight's own artifact, so a pointermove never builds the union
twice (4.2 s → 88 ms full candidate on the benchmark grid).
The frontend baseline is cached per (document identity, config epoch): ten
pointermoves make N+1 limit computations, not 2N — pinned by the smoke on a
real pointer gesture.
demo/benchmark_junction_limits.mjs (npm run benchmark:junction-limits) pins
the budgets for both mirrors: TS full candidate ≤100 ms (measured 88), py
warm validate ≤250 ms (measured 45), cold legacy ≤3.5 s — that path is
one-off and lives in the executor.
Issue: #330
User-Visible: yes
custom_components/houseplan/junction_limits.py repeats П1-П4 for the write
barrier in websocket_api, counting per rule so an inherited violation still
round-trips, and raises JunctionLimitError with the stable code
junction_limit_<rule>.
П5 is deliberately not mirrored — it judges the rendered wall bodies, and a
second mitre/inset pipeline in Python would drift more dangerously than the
rule it guards. Optimize stays outside the check for the same reason migration
and import do: it repairs existing geometry.
test_parity_with_the_frontend_checks feeds identical fixtures to the TS
functions and to this module and demands the same verdict, so the two
implementations cannot silently diverge.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: no
Диалог «Оптимизировать» при отказе перечисляет причину по каждому
пространству (7 значений OptimizeGeometryFailureReason получили RU/EN
строки), даёт «Скопировать диагностику» — JSON-блок с origin: runtime,
версией карточки, отпечатками и классами исключений (граница приватности
checkOptimizeGeometry; privacy-тесты дополнены позитивной проверкой) — и
пишет одну структурированную запись в dev-лог (дедупликация по fingerprint).
При недоступном clipboard блок раскрывается прямо в диалоге.
Совет «обновите House Plan» больше не безусловный: websocket
houseplan/config/get теперь возвращает integration_version (бэкенд-тест),
и подсказка показывается только при реальном расхождении с версией карточки;
старый бэкенд без поля — подсказки нет.
Три новых мутанта (потеря причины в диалоге, блок без reason, отключённый
dev-лог) — краснота каждого проверена исполнением; смок
smoke_preflight_diagnostics на dev падает.
Issue: #295
User-Visible: yes
Sergey Matyunin