The body of _process.yml is read from dev (@dev, #623), so the flags and
formats it passes to scripts are dev's. After "Опубликовать документ ревью"
the working copy of job integrate is the task branch, and a show/ship branch
with a clean merge is not rebased before review: its scripts/ may lag dev by
days. review-doc-guard.mjs silently ignores unknown flags (the anchor lost
#726 route and #737 usage), and a stale merge-candidate.mjs merges the old
way. Only two calls (#723 push refusal, #726 route) were taken from dev, each
with its own extraction, and on ship/reuse the remaining ones ran dev's
version anyway: the script version depended on the path.
Now one step right after setup-node extracts
`git archive origin/dev scripts .github/workflows/validate.yml` into
$RUNNER_TEMP/dev-tools and every repo script of the job runs from there via
TOOLS (review-result-gate, review-doc-guard, reviews-index, merge-candidate,
process-track route, status-label). validate.yml is part of the snapshot
because workflow-jobs.mjs reads it relative to itself; without it ci-proof
answers `failed (#622)` and every code merge would return to S6. The working
copy stays the material: git, the document and paths are judged there.
PROCESS.md §10.4 gets the paragraph "Скрипты конвейера — из dev": the
model_review exception, merges of pipeline changes judged by dev's version,
and compatible edits of the Validate proof contract.
Tests: test/process-integrate-tools.test.mjs is the job contract (no step
calls scripts/ from the working copy, every call goes through the snapshot,
one archive from origin/dev with validate.yml, and the step as is yields a
directory where ci-proof resolves the job contract); publish-push-refusal
runs the publish step and the #413 step on real bash with a task branch whose
review-doc-guard.mjs exits 7 (red with the old call). Existing harnesses take
the snapshot step before the publish and decide steps; the #706 mutant anchor
follows the status-label call.
Issue: #749
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.
The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.
The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Six workflows run from the default branch (issues, schedule, workflow_run):
process, process-resume, process-reconcile, mutation-gate, nightly,
process-metrics. Their bodies move to _<name>.yml (on: workflow_call); the
original files keep only triggers, run-name, permissions, concurrency and one
job `uses: Matysh/houseplan-card/.github/workflows/_<name>.yml@dev` with
`secrets: inherit`. A pipeline change becomes one commit to dev.
- caller job permissions = union of body job permissions (#556 minimum kept
per job inside the body); caller `if` repeats the body guard for process and
process-resume so unrelated events stay skipped;
- dispatch inputs forwarded via workflow_call inputs of the same names;
- _mutation-gate.yml keys evidence/marker on job.workflow_sha (the body SHA):
in a called workflow github.workflow_sha belongs to the caller in main;
- action-pins: narrow exception for this repo's _*.yml at @dev with a reason;
- preflight workflow_sync compares all six thin callers (was 3 of 6);
performance.yml excluded: its schedule judges main with main's own body;
- tests read bodies from _*.yml; new test/default-branch-workflows.test.mjs;
six mutants; PROCESS.md §10.4, AGENTS.md, REVIEWER.md updated.
Issue: #623
User-Visible: no
Три вещи, которые аудит 12.09 назвал в §10.
**Перемещаемые ссылки.** `home-assistant/actions/hassfest@master` и
`hacs/action@main` — это произвольный будущий коммит чужой ветки, а ревьюера с
Read/Write/Bash запускал перемещаемый major `anthropics/claude-code-action@v1`.
Все 116 `uses:` в девяти воркфлоу закреплены полным SHA с комментарием-версией;
`scripts/action-pins.mjs` это проверяет, а предполётный вердикт Validate —
исполняет. Локальная переиспользуемая workflow пина не требует и исключена
явно.
**Права.** Один блок `permissions` на весь конвейер выдавал `issues: write` и
OIDC каждой стадии, включая единственную недоверенную — работу модели. Теперь
права выдаются по job: модели только чтение и OIDC для самой
`claude-code-action`, писать в issue умеют детерминированные стадии.
**Граница.** Разбор запечатанного результата переехал из inline-shell в
`scripts/review-result-gate.mjs` — не ради красоты, а потому что в YAML его
нельзя прогнать ни одним отрицательным случаем. Проверяются те же вещи, что и
раньше, и в том же объёме: точный набор файлов, контрольные суммы, схема
паспорта и совпадение КАЖДОГО из семнадцати полей с тем, что посчитала
детерминированная стадия. Сверху — пятнадцать враждебных фикстур: неполный
набор, лишний файл, подменённое содержимое, чужой run и попытка, устаревший
material_sha и tree, чужие задача, этап, раунд и ветка, вердикт вне словаря,
пустой документ, manifest не о тех файлах, неразбираемый JSON.
Настоящих секретов и привилегированных операций фикстуры не трогают.
Issue: #556
User-Visible: no
