After #705 and #723 two more workflow bodies still treated every failed
push as a moved dev: the SHIP-REVIEW publication (_ship-review.yml) retried
three times with "dev went ahead", and the derived-artifacts bot commit
(_beta-derived.yml) told the release manager to rerun the workflow. A
refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a branch
rule, a hook - is cured by neither, and neither step said what GitHub
answered.
Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). A stale lease keeps the old
behaviour: another attempt for the ship review, the rerun advice for the
derived artifacts. Any other outcome stops the step at once: the log gets
the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer
without secrets (--summary, refusalSummary with the new ship-review and
beta-derived labels). The classifier comes from dev, as for the other steps
of these bodies: both jobs check out dev, and the ship review resets to
origin/dev before every attempt. The ship review commit message is built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc, as in #723. The thin callers
ship-review.yml and beta-derived.yml are untouched.
The rebase guard in _process.yml also writes the refusal reason to its step
summary now (--summary, label "rebase"); a stale lease writes none.
test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories (moved dev = a real neighbour
push, GitHub refusal = recorded stderr with a token, a credential URL and
an Authorization header); on the old bodies 10 of its 12 new tests fail.
The #705 execution tests of the rebase guard in rebase-generated.test.mjs
now also read the step summary. PROCESS.md names the two steps next to the
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.
The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.
The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The ship limits count lines and files but not what was touched: a
12-line pointerdown handler passed them like a typo and merged unread.
The track rule also lived twice - the guard computed the cycle limit in
bash while process-track.mjs computed the track, and the two disagreed
on multiple track labels. The packet still told authors to rebase
show/ship branches that merge cleanly.
- scripts/change-risk.mjs: one pure classifier over `git diff -U0` from
the merge base. Class A lines only; comments, blank lines and pure
renames give no risk; deletions do. Area and token rules per class
(geometry, touch, migration, devices, perf, ux, visual render/ui),
evidence as path:line, five per class.
- process-track.mjs: owner confirmation is a comment line
"Трек: <x> — решение владельца" by the repo owner (latest wins, only
for the current track); several track labels read as the strictest
with a warning; cycleLimit, guardLimit and rebaseBeforeReview are the
single source. `stage` makes the whole S7 track decision in one call:
ship with risk and no confirmation is raised to show with evidence,
a confirmed ship keeps merging without the model and records the risk
for the batch review; show/ask get a risk note for the reviewer.
- _process.yml: the guard asks process-track.mjs for the limit and keeps
no track logic; the track step calls the script once and only
executes its raise flag and comment file; risk_note reaches the
Review prompt, ship_risk reaches the hp:ship-merge comment (marker
line unchanged).
- task-packet.mjs: track basis, limit and rebase policy; next step
without the stale rebase line; risk with its consequence per track;
required checks with reasons (ci:golden only on render risk);
changelog and visual evidence - from the same exports.
- ship-review.mjs: the batch brief prints the risk line of a ship merge.
- Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, §11.7, both digests, AGENTS.md.
- Registry anchors that watched the moved code are moved, not dropped.
Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Two steps publish a commit and treated every failed push as a moved branch:
the release review job (release-review.yml) retried three times with "dev
went ahead", and the review document step (_process.yml) rebased and pushed
again. A refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a
branch rule, a hook - cannot be cured by a retry or a rebase, and the step
never said what GitHub answered.
Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI the rebase guard uses (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). Only a
stale lease (rejected / fetch first / stale info) keeps the old retry or
rebase. Any other outcome stops the step at once, without retries: the log
gets the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer,
both passed through redactSecrets (token, credential URL, Authorization).
The review document step takes the classifier from dev, as the rebase guard
does: a task branch behind dev may not carry it.
The summary text is written by the new --summary option (refusalSummary),
not by a multi-line string in run:, and both commit messages are now built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc (PROCESS.md §10.4 item 4).
release-review.yml is dispatch-only and is not mirrored to main. PROCESS.md
names the rule next to the rebase guard; the #638 trailer witness in
test/release-review.test.mjs follows the line-by-line message.
test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories; only the push transport is
replaced: a moved branch is a real neighbour push, a GitHub refusal is a
recorded stderr carrying a token, a credential URL and an Authorization
header. On the old steps 9 of its 11 tests fail.
Issue: #723
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
merge-candidate treated any push stderr containing "rejected" as a stale
lease. A `! [remote rejected]` from GitHub itself - in #700 the rebased
candidate changed .github/workflows/ and the conveyor token has no workflow
permission (runs 36484993494, 36487044060) - became "the branch moved after
the reviewed material (#312)", and the stderr was never printed, so the
author was sent to look for a commit that did not exist.
classifyPushRefusal now tells three outcomes apart: a stale lease
(`[rejected] (stale info)`, `fetch first`, a server-side lock race) keeps
the old behaviour; GitHub's workflow refusal (PAT, OAuth App, GitHub App,
bot and integration wordings) and any other `[remote rejected]` get their
own outcome, S6-in-progress and a comment naming the reason. The workflow
comment says what to do: the author rebases and pushes, or the owner grants
the permission. The git answer goes to the log and the comment with tokens
and credential URLs cut out; the merge-step failure comment is redacted too.
The rebase guard in _process.yml parses its push refusal with the same code
(`merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal`): a stale lease is the old error, a
workflow refusal returns the task to S6 without review like a conflict, and
material/reuse/gate skip the rebase that never reached the branch.
Mutant push-refusal-kinds-glued restores the old regex; guard: #705 AC1.
Issue: #705
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Owner's decision 2026-09-29: mutants check the tests, not the product.
During development they are not run at all — not locally, not in CI,
not by the reviewer. The whole registry is the nightly run
(mutation-gate.yml, #513); a survivor files an issue (#472). The #693
post-mortem: 36 of 57 minutes of a one-line fix went to optional work.
- process-track.mjs: `mutants` is always false (no track, no label).
- classify-changes.mjs: Validate requests no diff mutants on any event;
the `mutants` input stays so old `-f mutants=…` calls do not fail.
- _process.yml: the default for the gate and the merge is false.
- pre-push-gate.mjs: the manual run no longer runs mutants.
- Canon: PROCESS §2.7 (a mutant is written, not run; `--check` keeps the
anchors), §5.1 (`ci:mutants` retired), §8 (ship/show: nothing beyond
gate:small and the spec — one proof per item, no `--smokes` on ship,
a stray flake is an issue, not an investigation), §10.4; AUTHOR,
REVIEWER, AGENTS, TESTING.
- Registry: four mutants of the old request rules replaced by
dev-mutants-requested-again and track-pays-for-mutants-again.
Issue: #709
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The label step after integration ran one gh call
`--add-label "$TO" --remove-label "$FROM"`. For the rereview outcome
TO == FROM == S7-code-review, and gh added and removed the same label:
#699 was left without a status and no new round started (run
36491087708).
- scripts/status-label.mjs: the same label is removed and set again
through relabel from process-reconcile (#555), so the labeled event
starts the next round and a failed restore fails the step; a
different label is still one call.
- _process.yml: the step calls the script.
- PROCESS.md: the exact-candidate rule names the relabel.
- test/status-label.test.mjs; mutants rereview-relabel-in-one-call and
process-label-step-combined-again.
Issue: #706
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Сверка PROCESS.md, ролевых выжимок, AGENTS.md, TESTING.md, CONTRIBUTING.md
и скриптов по 26 найденным расхождениям (D1–D26): трейлеры по классам
изменений, gate:small как единственный источник состава, пороги ревью,
путь реестра мутантов, golden по ci:golden, порядок чтения промпта ревью.
- scripts/change-classes.mjs: классы A/B/C/D — один модуль для
process-gate и проверки трейлеров.
- commit-msg: коммит только с файлами класса C (документация) трейлеров
не требует; указанные трейлеры по-прежнему проверяются.
- Маршрут автора без docs/STATUS.md: 5345 → 4703 слова.
- Промпт ревью читает SCOPE → AGENTS → REVIEWER, как ROUTES.reviewer.
Issue: #701
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The screenshot fingerprint and golden baselines stop being a tax on every
task branch:
- Task branches no longer commit docs/images/** or golden baselines. On a
branch the screenshot freshness stays a preflight warning; the review
prompt, REVIEWER.md and AUTHOR.md drop check-docs as a per-task gate.
- beta-derived.yml refreshes them on dev in one bot commit before the beta
candidate: canonical docs capture + docs:accept --reviewed, golden from
the golden-images artifact of a completed Validate on dev +
golden:accept --reviewed. A changed frame or scene is accepted only when
named in the inputs; undeclared differences refuse. Baseline commits carry
Release: and Baseline-Reviewed:; the subject is not a candidate subject.
- classify-changes: the Release: trailer on an issue/* branch no longer
switches on the heavy set. ci:full / ci:golden do: process-track emits
full=true, the review gate dispatches Validate with full=true and does not
accept a light proof.
Canon: PROCESS.md §3 п.13, §5.1, §8, §11.4; CONTRIBUTING.md.
Issue: #697
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
show/ship stop paying for diff mutants and for every move of dev:
- scripts/process-track.mjs resolves the track from the current labels and
the diff (show for unlabelled infra, ask for unlabelled product work) and
checks the mechanical ship limits; outside them the pipeline comments and
relabels track:ship -> track:show in the same round.
- Validate on the review material is light on show/ship: a completed push
run on the exact SHA is proof, a dispatch asks mutants=false. ask and the
ci:mutants label keep the mutant dispatch.
- show/ship skip the pre-review rebase when git merge-tree with dev is
clean; the candidate is rebased once at merge and still passes Validate
before the push to dev. The light merge waits for the push run of the
candidate and dispatches only when none appears.
- ship inside the limits merges after the light Validate without a model
review; the issue gets a machine marker hp:ship-merge.
- ship-review.yml + scripts/ship-review.mjs read the code of all ship
tasks of a beta range in one model session and publish
docs/reviews/SHIP-REVIEW-<tag>.md; both beta publication paths refuse a
range with ship tasks the document does not cover or that carries a High.
- show reviews judge correctness and AC; the spec review installs neither
npm ci nor Chromium, the show review installs Chromium only when the issue
names a smoke.
Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, new §11.7; REVIEWER.md, AUTHOR.md and
AGENTS.md digests.
Issue: #696
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
CODE-REVIEW-695-r1 Medium: PROCESS §5.1 says an infrastructure task (§1)
without a track label reads as track:show, but neither the pipeline guard
nor the task packet did that.
- _process.yml guard: with no track:* and no small/trivial label, the
diff of the task branch against dev (compare API) with no class A file
gives the show cycle limit 2. A truncated compare answer (300 files)
proves nothing and keeps the limit 4.
- task-packet.mjs: an infrastructure packet names the track it runs on:
«инфраструктурный · show» without a label, the owner's label otherwise.
- Mutants guard-infra-keeps-ask-limit and
packet-infra-track-ignores-show-default.
Issue: #695
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The analysis of 85 closed tasks #600-#691 showed that the light track
cost as much as the full one (115 min and 12 events vs 102 and 13) and
that the owner had no label to choose the route. The owner accepted the
proposal on 2026-09-28.
- PROCESS §5 is the track table: track:ship (S1 -> S5, one line under
"## ТЗ", <= 30 src lines, batch review before the beta), track:show
(default, S2 -> S5, up to three AC, no spec review, 2 code cycles),
track:ask (full route). The owner's label beats the criteria, which
become a hint; any agent may raise a track, only the owner lowers it.
- §5.1: ci:full / ci:golden / ci:mutants order heavy checks on any track;
small and trivial read as track:show, no label as track:ask, an
infrastructure task as track:show.
- §2, §2.2, §2.4, §2.5, §4, §7.1, §7.2, §9, §11 follow; AUTHOR/REVIEWER
digests and AGENTS.md follow with the digest test and its mutants.
- task-packet.mjs reports the track via trackFromLabels(); the pipeline
reads track:show/track:ship for the cycle limit of 2 and lets an
explicit track:ask win. Pipeline behaviour by track is #696.
Issue: #695
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Волна 3 эпика #674. AGENTS.md 650 → 187 строк: карта пакета, маршрут чтения,
правило №1, классы и треки одной строкой со ссылками, трейлеры, рабочие
деревья, хендофф и ожидание вердикта; пересказы PROCESS.md — ссылками на
разделы. Неверный список «Gate jobs» снят (списки jobs не копируются в прозу,
шапка PROCESS.md). Правила, жившие только в AGENTS, получили дом: жёлтый
вердикт при выполненных AC — PROCESS §2.7; свежесть бандла, съёмка только в
Linux (#455, HP_ALLOW_FOREIGN_CAPTURE) и смоки из AC до S7 (#151) —
TESTING.md; причуда демо-стенда и среда-зависимый smoke_opening_measure —
DEVELOPMENT › Smoke tests; отказ публикации без `Release:` и при несвежем
отпечатке бандла, отмена Validate новым пушем, кандидат беты не
promotion-only, fail-closed реестра Labs — DEVELOPMENT; предупреждение и
ошибка свежести скриншотов — CONTRIBUTING.
PROCESS.md: §13 (внедрение с открытым ⏳), §14 (блок со ссылкой на
несуществующий docs/PROCESS.md) и §7.3 (история) удалены. Ссылки «§7.2» на
правило полного разбора после ребейза ведут в §2.10, на сверку SHA перед
выводом — в §2.7; то же в сообщениях scripts/branch-state.mjs,
merge-candidate.mjs, review-doc-guard.mjs, pre-push-gate.mjs, в промпте
_process.yml и TESTING.md. Число `any` в прозе → `node scripts/no-new-any.mjs
--total` (новый режим, юнит-тест; было «1034 в 49 файлах», сейчас 862 в 52),
дата-число замороженного списка якорей монолита снято. Устаревшая команда
пересъёмки скриншотов в §8 заменена ссылкой на действующий путь.
STATUS.md 113 → 61 строка: сгенерированный снимок, текущий цикл и девять
строк решений; Workflow, CI, Toolchain, Tests, Scope, open items и политика
документации — ссылками (PROCESS §2.6, DEVELOPMENT › Release, TESTING);
локали en/ru/de/fr; закрытые «coverage, mypy strict» сняты.
DEVELOPMENT.md: file-sync и «Reproducible scripts» (прототип) удалены;
раздел Release — единственный дом релизной механики: введение, правила
тела стабильного релиза (#328, release:notes), шаг continuity:screencast,
источники версии по release-contract. CONTRIBUTING: ссылка на Release вместо
пересказа, замеры клона без чисел. TESTING: any-гейт — ссылкой на PROCESS §8.
entry-cost: автор 11 125 → 5 407 слов, ревьюер 8 464 → 4 285.
Issue: #680
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Волна 2 эпика #674 — у каждого правила один дом, остальные места ссылаются.
DECOR-EDITOR.md ← BACKDROP.md + LIVE-TEXT.md: один документ с нумерованными
разделами (§3 подложка, §5 текст с живыми значениями), на которые теперь
указывают комментарии кода вместо несуществовавших «BACKDROP §2/§3»;
исправлено утверждение, что space-card не рисует декор (он рисует подложку
и картинки декора, но не фигуры, мебель и текст). LIGHT.md ← матрица
настроек света (перевод, тест назван явно: test/devices.test.mjs «issues
84/88»). DEVICE-PRESENTATION.md ← правила «что показывает маркер» из
FILTERING.md (порядок cover → light sources → device role, шторы,
медиаплееры); «в одном pull request» → «в одном коммите». CANVAS.md: §9.5
«Оптимизировать планы» → CONFIG-COMPATIBILITY.md, overlay и планарные грани
Walls → WALL-THICKNESS.md §10–11, таблицы «было/стало» сняты. TESTING-DEMO.md
→ demo/stand/README.md: карта демо-дома и «чего на стенде нет», ручной
чек-лист снят (ручной фазы в процессе нет). ISOMETRIC.md — только текущее;
история Stage 2/4 — docs/adr/570-isometric-stage4-visual-handoff.md.
SUN.md: удалённый контракт фона снят, правило бумаги — в текущем разделе.
UX-MODES.md: декор над заливками, а не «под комнатами»; «hidden isometric»;
follow-up из #3 — все выпущены. Шапки VACUUM, WARM-REMOUNT («Выровнять всё
по сетке» → «Оптимизировать планы»), WALL-THICKNESS, STYLING-HOOKS,
CONFIG-COMPATIBILITY (#33), PDF-EXPORT — без устаревших статусов и планов.
README EN/RU: абзац про пересъёмку скриншотов → CONTRIBUTING.md, RADAR и
PDF-EXPORT в списке документации, RU догнал EN (2.5D, повторное
использование загруженного изображения, STAIRS). Один список канонических
документов подсистем в AGENTS.md и промпте ревьюера (_process.yml).
WALL-THICKNESS.md ссылается на ADR 282.
Правки src/** и validation.py — только пути документов в комментариях.
Issue: #679
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
`ubuntu-latest` с 19.10.2026 переезжает на Ubuntu 26, а golden, скриншоты
документации и перф-бюджеты сняты на текущем образе: все 43 job на раннере
теперь явно на `ubuntu-24.04`, один образ на все workflow. 26 job получили
`timeout-minutes` по наблюдённой длительности с запасом; гейт релиза — 180,
больше суммы собственных ожиданий (60 + 60 + 45). Расписания ушли с круглых
минут (ночь 02:17, мутанты 00:43, метрики 05:23, полный перф 04:11), ночь
пишет в summary сдвиг старта и предупреждает, если он больше часа.
test/workflow-hygiene.test.mjs держит все три правила по тексту workflow
(разбор `parseJobSettings` в scripts/workflow-jobs.mjs) и исполняет шаг
сдвига старта настоящим bash; порядок осознанного подъёма образа —
docs/DEVELOPMENT.md.
Issue: #658
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Решения владельца: 1б — индекс ревью не пересобирается в ветке задачи,
только коммитами, идущими в dev; 2б — бандл меняет только кандидат
беты/релиза, стенд dev берёт его из артефакта Validate.
- scripts/bundle-policy.mjs: коммит, трогающий dist/** или
custom_components/houseplan/frontend/**, обязан нести Release:
(хук commit-msg и история в CI через validate-commit-provenance;
коммиты с датой автора до 2026-09-27 не судятся); --verify судит
целостность свежей сборки всегда, побайтовую сверку с закоммиченной
копией — только на коммите, меняющем бандл, или кандидате; --clean.
- release-prerelease: публикация отказывает, если отпечаток исходников
в закоммиченном манифесте не равен отпечатку дерева (хотфикс поверх
кандидата без пересборки).
- bundle-sync: по умолчанию только demo/srv/assets; --release
(npm run bundle:release) — ещё и custom_components.
- rebase-on-dev: конфликт в бандле берёт копию dev, без пересборки
и amend.
- validate.yml: job dev_build публикует card-bundle головы dev в
сиротскую ветку dev-build (scripts/dev-build.mjs); стенд накладывает
её demo/stand/update-dev-bundle.sh.
- _process.yml: индекс ревью больше не пересобирается при приведении
к dev и при публикации документа в ветку задачи.
- golden-wsl-artifact/golden-container: сборка перед съёмкой не
считается правкой источника, после — bundle:clean.
- test/bundle-tree-committed: судит закоммиченный снимок, не диск.
- 11 мутантов в реестре; PROCESS/AGENTS/DEVELOPMENT/AUTHOR/REVIEWER.
Issue: #657
User-Visible: no
Six workflows run from the default branch (issues, schedule, workflow_run):
process, process-resume, process-reconcile, mutation-gate, nightly,
process-metrics. Their bodies move to _<name>.yml (on: workflow_call); the
original files keep only triggers, run-name, permissions, concurrency and one
job `uses: Matysh/houseplan-card/.github/workflows/_<name>.yml@dev` with
`secrets: inherit`. A pipeline change becomes one commit to dev.
- caller job permissions = union of body job permissions (#556 minimum kept
per job inside the body); caller `if` repeats the body guard for process and
process-resume so unrelated events stay skipped;
- dispatch inputs forwarded via workflow_call inputs of the same names;
- _mutation-gate.yml keys evidence/marker on job.workflow_sha (the body SHA):
in a called workflow github.workflow_sha belongs to the caller in main;
- action-pins: narrow exception for this repo's _*.yml at @dev with a reason;
- preflight workflow_sync compares all six thin callers (was 3 of 6);
performance.yml excluded: its schedule judges main with main's own body;
- tests read bodies from _*.yml; new test/default-branch-workflows.test.mjs;
six mutants; PROCESS.md §10.4, AGENTS.md, REVIEWER.md updated.
Issue: #623
User-Visible: no
Claude