Полные бенчмарки кандидата v1.76.0 (прогон 35097102695, SHA c3d64789) против
v1.75.0 покраснели на двух скрытых изометрических профилях:
| метрика | v1.75.0 | v1.76.0 | предел |
|---|---|---|---|
| large-house-isometric resizePreview | 603 | 981.4 | 753 |
| large-house-isometric panZoom | 90.8 | 205.2 | 150.8 |
| stage3-dense stateUpdate | 77.5 | 169.1 | 152.5 |
| stage3-dense resizePreview | 582.5 | 765.6 | 732.5 |
| stage3-dense panZoom | 90.6 | 171.7 | 150.6 |
Шаг настоящий и объяснённый: #583 добавил скрытому 2.5D-виду геометрии, а
поиск свободного места для подписей даже после ускорения решёткой стоит вдвое
дороже, чем до #583. Абсолютные потолки не тронуты и держатся с запасом
(panZoom 205 при 600, resize 981 при 2200); все семь пользовательских профилей
зелёные — регрессия целиком внутри вида за `hp_alpha`.
Решение владельца 2026-09-16: принять. Рычаг — допуск в миллисекундах, а не
коэффициент: он покрывает разовый сдвиг уровня и продолжает ловить рост от
нового уровня, тогда как поднятый коэффициент разрешил бы удвоение навсегда.
Значения одинаковы у обоих профилей — контракт #160 требует, чтобы плотный
двойник Stage 3 делил с историческим профилем каждый общий потолок, и тест
`performance-workflow` это стережёт.
Допуски временные. #585 переписывает поиск на перебор границ препятствий
вместо скана диска 48 px; когда он приедет, значения возвращаются к 150/60/75.
Тест `performance-budget` фиксирует и числа, и то, что наблюдённый шаг проходит,
а следующий такой же — уже нет.
Честно о границе метода: сравнение идёт с ПРЕДЫДУЩЕЙ вершиной main, а она уже
несёт эту же линейку, поэтому следующий прогон был бы зелёным и без правки
бюджетов. Правка сделана не ради зелёного прогона, а чтобы принятый уровень был
записан явно и проверялся тестом. Отдельно завожу, что базой стабильного
кандидата должен быть предыдущий стабильный тег, а не вершина main.
npm test 2721/2720/0 fail.
Issue: #585
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.76.0
#500 gave `_serverCfg` and `_layout` prototype accessors but left them in
`static properties`. Lit marks such a property `wrapped` and, on the FIRST
update, force-writes it into `changedProperties` with an `undefined` old
value even though nobody assigned anything (`reactive-element.js:249-252`
and `:880-886`). `willUpdate` reads that as a config replacement, raises
`_cfgEpoch`, the memoized model key changes, and a 60-room house builds and
paints its model a second time: measured 19 update cycles, 4 builds and 4
epochs against 18 / 3 / 3 before #500, worth ~550 ms of `modelReadyMs` and
the same on `firstStableRenderMs` (3355 against a 3000 ceiling).
The declaration goes; the bodies stay reactive through the owner —
`_adoption` → `onBodyReplaced` → `requestUpdate(field, previous)` — which
needs no declaration: `getPropertyOptions` falls back to the default and
`changed.has('_serverCfg')` works as before. `noAccessor: true` would not
help, `wrapped` is set before that flag is read. The trap is written above
`static properties`, where someone would put the declaration back.
`cache.entries.cleanFloor` returns to 100 in both interaction budgets: the
120 entries were the extra epoch re-keying the per-room cache, not a
property of the design — the reasoning in 914e8402 was wrong.
Witness: test/config-adoption-ownership.test.mjs pins that neither body is
declared; the mutant `adoption-bodies-declared-reactive` puts the
declaration back and reddens it.
The boot diagnostics of the previous three commits touch four private
members, so they are declared in the performance contract: `_buildModel` and
`_cfgEpoch` outright (both exist in every supported comparison base), and the
adoption entry point as a current/legacy pair — #500 turned the private
`_adoptStructuralResponses` into the public `_adoptAuthoritative`, and an
undeclared rename would have the counter report zero adoptions instead of
failing.
The same commits carried a `node_modules` symlink: `.gitignore` had the
pattern with a trailing slash, which does not cover a symbolic link, and
`git add -A` in a sandbox worktree committed it. The link is removed and the
pattern loses the slash; a mutant run on this branch failed with `EEXIST` on
it.
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
The pre-release perf gate of the v1.74.0-beta.1 candidate reported
cache.entries.cleanFloor 120 against a ceiling of 100 (run 34480302982,
large-house-interaction-v1). The ceiling was calibrated when only the visible
space populated `_cleanFloorCache`; since #509 the summary panel computes the
clean-floor total in per-room slices through the same cache, so the sixty
fixture rooms are cached under both config epochs the interaction profile
creates — 60 × 2 = 120, exactly what the run measured.
The ceiling moves to 180 in the smoke and in the full interaction profile:
one entry per room per epoch with room for a third epoch, far below the LRU
cap of 600 and far below anything a per-frame or per-marker regression would
produce. The leak detector is untouched: cacheGrowth.cleanFloor stays 0.
Issue: #509
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.74.0-beta.1
The gate used to require every Validate run on the tag SHA to be green:
a cancelled duplicate or a red flake that a later re-run had fixed kept
the stable release blocked (v1.73.0, 09.09 — released by hand). Now the
verdict comes from the newest run that was not cancelled: not completed →
wait, success → pass, anything else → fail, no run → wait. The same rule
is documented for the perf workflow and the release runbook.
Mutants: release-gate-counts-cancelled-runs, release-gate-oldest-run-wins.
Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
The #160 contract test keeps the dense profile's longTasks block equal to
the historical isometric one, and both profiles boot through the same lazy
iso-scene-render chunk; the accepted split applies to both. Validate
34356856702 caught the divergence.
Issue: #507
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0
Full Performance of the v1.73.0 stable candidate against the v1.72.0 product
(run 34354409872) was red on one check of the isometric profile:
longTask.countP95 16 → 20 against max(16×1.2, 16+3) = 19.2, with every
timing, longTask.totalP95Ms and longTask.maxSingleMs green. The trace behind
#506 shows why: since v1.73.0-beta.1 the isometric renderer is the lazy
iso-scene-render chunk (#160 Stage 3), so the single v1.72.0 boot task is
split in two around that import — the same work, +2 tasks.
Owner decision 2026-09-09: accept the split. countNoiseAllowance 3 → 5 for
large-house-isometric-v1 only; the ratio, the hard ceiling, total and
maximum single task keep gating real growth. The downloaded CI artefact
re-evaluated with this budget passes (limit 21, actual 20, no failures).
Documented in demo/performance/README.md; the budget test pins the
allowance and the untouched profiles.
Issue: #507
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0
Классификация changes вынесена в scripts/classify-changes.mjs (выходы
perf_iso/perf_interaction, fallback --all). performance_smoke добавляет
large-house-isometric-v1 при правке src/iso-* и large-house-interaction-v1
при правке живого пути, по 3 образца против hardMaxMs полных профилей
(budgets-*-smoke.json). Набор профилей входит в ключ reuse. PROCESS.md §8.
Issue: #473
User-Visible: no
Codex