The body of _process.yml is read from dev (@dev, #623). After "Перейти на
ветку задачи" the working copy of job prepare is the task branch, and a
show/ship branch with a clean merge is not rebased before review: its
scripts/ may lag dev or be replaced. #749 fixed job integrate; prepare
still ran four control scripts from the material — the issue-body digest
for the anchor, --reuse of a green verdict (#499), validate-gate (#510)
and the spec-change check (#517). The material decided its own admission:
a branch whose review-doc-guard.mjs prints reuse=true merges without the
model. model_review took model-usage.mjs from the material too: a lagging
branch has none, and the publication silently wrote reason=missing.
Now prepare extracts one snapshot right after setup-node, before the
branch switch: `git rev-parse origin/dev` once and `git archive <sha>
scripts .github/workflows/validate.yml`, so the git fetch of the track and
rebase steps cannot mix versions. Every repo script of the job runs from
it via TOOLS — the track step and the rebase guard lose their own
extractions. The SHA goes out as job output tools_sha; the usage step of
model_review archives the same commit inside itself, so a snapshot failure
is a failure of the reporting step (continue-on-error), not of the stage.
The model session runs on that runner, so the usage line stays untrusted
input parsed strictly (#556, #737).
withMaterialAnchors is idempotent: a repeated call drops the separator the
previous call wrote instead of piling up `---` lines.
Tests: test/process-prepare-tools.test.mjs — the job contract (no step
calls scripts/ from the working copy, one pinned archive before the branch
switch, tools_sha reaches model_review) and the steps as they are, on real
bash and git: a branch behind dev without model-usage.mjs and with a
substituted review-doc-guard.mjs; the anchor digest, reuse and the spec
check come from dev, the usage line is data even after dev moved. Red on
the old workflow: all four. Harnesses of process-track, rebase-generated,
review-doc-guard and model-usage take the prepare snapshot. Three registry
mutants (reuse from the material, usage from moving dev, separators).
Canon: PROCESS.md §10.4 «Скрипты конвейера — из dev» covers prepare and
the usage step; «Расход модели» names it a pipeline step, not the reviewer's.
Issue: #765
User-Visible: no
Five places still described the pipeline as it was before code that is
already in dev:
- the S3 hint of the task packet told the author to push the branch, while
the spec lives in the issue body (§2.3, #517) and nothing is pushed
before S5 (§11.8);
- process-gate printed «FAIL п.9 Gates: light» for a trailer nobody writes
or reads, while §10.2 item 9 is the unimplemented release:prerelease
verdict check. The check is removed; a contract test ties every RULES key
to an implemented item of §10.2 and every finding number to a RULES key;
- §10.4 item 4 demanded a heredoc in run:, while #723/#730 and their tests
demand the opposite: commit messages echo line by line into a file,
comment and summary texts come from code;
- the ship merge comment, AUTHOR.md, REVIEWER.md and AGENTS.md named only
the pre-beta document, though since #727 the night reads ship code first;
- the nightly publication committed «docs: ship review for nightly …
перед бетой» with the beta step's Issue: #696. It now has its own
subject (the document name), body and Issue: #727; the beta message is
unchanged.
The browser-guard inventory note still said growth above 200 fails
mutation-gate --check; since #699 it is a guideline and --check warns. Its
counts now match the inventory: 205, lifecycle 90.
Issue: #748
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The body of _process.yml is read from dev (@dev, #623), so the flags and
formats it passes to scripts are dev's. After "Опубликовать документ ревью"
the working copy of job integrate is the task branch, and a show/ship branch
with a clean merge is not rebased before review: its scripts/ may lag dev by
days. review-doc-guard.mjs silently ignores unknown flags (the anchor lost
#726 route and #737 usage), and a stale merge-candidate.mjs merges the old
way. Only two calls (#723 push refusal, #726 route) were taken from dev, each
with its own extraction, and on ship/reuse the remaining ones ran dev's
version anyway: the script version depended on the path.
Now one step right after setup-node extracts
`git archive origin/dev scripts .github/workflows/validate.yml` into
$RUNNER_TEMP/dev-tools and every repo script of the job runs from there via
TOOLS (review-result-gate, review-doc-guard, reviews-index, merge-candidate,
process-track route, status-label). validate.yml is part of the snapshot
because workflow-jobs.mjs reads it relative to itself; without it ci-proof
answers `failed (#622)` and every code merge would return to S6. The working
copy stays the material: git, the document and paths are judged there.
PROCESS.md §10.4 gets the paragraph "Скрипты конвейера — из dev": the
model_review exception, merges of pipeline changes judged by dev's version,
and compatible edits of the Validate proof contract.
Tests: test/process-integrate-tools.test.mjs is the job contract (no step
calls scripts/ from the working copy, every call goes through the snapshot,
one archive from origin/dev with validate.yml, and the step as is yields a
directory where ci-proof resolves the job contract); publish-push-refusal
runs the publish step and the #413 step on real bash with a task branch whose
review-doc-guard.mjs exits 7 (red with the old call). Existing harnesses take
the snapshot step before the publish and decide steps; the #706 mutant anchor
follows the status-label call.
Issue: #749
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The risk table of #707 judged every non-comment line of a class A file as
code. On the history since 15.09 that raised #741 from ship to show for a
removed interface member that never reaches JS, and put false classes on
#624 (removed imports), #693/#694 (stairs-view is rendering, not geometry)
and #725 (the config fingerprint memo is not the config schema).
- Lines of module syntax and TypeScript types give no risk, like comments:
`import …`, `export … from …`, `export type …`, the head of `interface X`
or `type X =`, and the lines inside such a block (indented, plus the
closing line). The block state per side of a change block starts from the
hunk context git writes after `@@ … @@` and follows every unindented line
of the block, so a member under `@@ … @@ export interface X {` and a whole
interface added in one hunk are judged alike. Only `.ts`, and not in the
`migration` area: there the types are the config contract (#588, #649).
- `stairs*` is narrowed to the stairs model (`stairs`, `stairs-box`,
`stairs-editor-model`); `config-*` to writing and adopting the config
(`config-adoption`, `config-store`, `config-reload-authority`,
`config-write-conflict`).
- A replaced line is one piece of evidence: a removed line whose counterpart
in the same change block hits the same class is folded into it instead of
printing `path:N (удалена)` next to `path:N`.
classifyRisk stays a pure function over the diff text. On the history the
raising classes change for #741 (none), #693 (visual only), #694 (no
geometry), #725 (perf only) and #624 (no devices/perf); migration on #588,
#612, #649 and #661 stays. PROCESS.md §5 names the new exemption.
Issue: #755
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.
The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.
The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The ship limits count lines and files but not what was touched: a
12-line pointerdown handler passed them like a typo and merged unread.
The track rule also lived twice - the guard computed the cycle limit in
bash while process-track.mjs computed the track, and the two disagreed
on multiple track labels. The packet still told authors to rebase
show/ship branches that merge cleanly.
- scripts/change-risk.mjs: one pure classifier over `git diff -U0` from
the merge base. Class A lines only; comments, blank lines and pure
renames give no risk; deletions do. Area and token rules per class
(geometry, touch, migration, devices, perf, ux, visual render/ui),
evidence as path:line, five per class.
- process-track.mjs: owner confirmation is a comment line
"Трек: <x> — решение владельца" by the repo owner (latest wins, only
for the current track); several track labels read as the strictest
with a warning; cycleLimit, guardLimit and rebaseBeforeReview are the
single source. `stage` makes the whole S7 track decision in one call:
ship with risk and no confirmation is raised to show with evidence,
a confirmed ship keeps merging without the model and records the risk
for the batch review; show/ask get a risk note for the reviewer.
- _process.yml: the guard asks process-track.mjs for the limit and keeps
no track logic; the track step calls the script once and only
executes its raise flag and comment file; risk_note reaches the
Review prompt, ship_risk reaches the hp:ship-merge comment (marker
line unchanged).
- task-packet.mjs: track basis, limit and rebase policy; next step
without the stale rebase line; risk with its consequence per track;
required checks with reasons (ci:golden only on render risk);
changelog and visual evidence - from the same exports.
- ship-review.mjs: the batch brief prints the risk line of a ship merge.
- Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, §11.7, both digests, AGENTS.md.
- Registry anchors that watched the moved code are moved, not dropped.
Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Owner's decision 2026-09-29: mutants check the tests, not the product.
During development they are not run at all — not locally, not in CI,
not by the reviewer. The whole registry is the nightly run
(mutation-gate.yml, #513); a survivor files an issue (#472). The #693
post-mortem: 36 of 57 minutes of a one-line fix went to optional work.
- process-track.mjs: `mutants` is always false (no track, no label).
- classify-changes.mjs: Validate requests no diff mutants on any event;
the `mutants` input stays so old `-f mutants=…` calls do not fail.
- _process.yml: the default for the gate and the merge is false.
- pre-push-gate.mjs: the manual run no longer runs mutants.
- Canon: PROCESS §2.7 (a mutant is written, not run; `--check` keeps the
anchors), §5.1 (`ci:mutants` retired), §8 (ship/show: nothing beyond
gate:small and the spec — one proof per item, no `--smokes` on ship,
a stray flake is an issue, not an investigation), §10.4; AUTHOR,
REVIEWER, AGENTS, TESTING.
- Registry: four mutants of the old request rules replaced by
dev-mutants-requested-again and track-pays-for-mutants-again.
Issue: #709
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The screenshot fingerprint and golden baselines stop being a tax on every
task branch:
- Task branches no longer commit docs/images/** or golden baselines. On a
branch the screenshot freshness stays a preflight warning; the review
prompt, REVIEWER.md and AUTHOR.md drop check-docs as a per-task gate.
- beta-derived.yml refreshes them on dev in one bot commit before the beta
candidate: canonical docs capture + docs:accept --reviewed, golden from
the golden-images artifact of a completed Validate on dev +
golden:accept --reviewed. A changed frame or scene is accepted only when
named in the inputs; undeclared differences refuse. Baseline commits carry
Release: and Baseline-Reviewed:; the subject is not a candidate subject.
- classify-changes: the Release: trailer on an issue/* branch no longer
switches on the heavy set. ci:full / ci:golden do: process-track emits
full=true, the review gate dispatches Validate with full=true and does not
accept a light proof.
Canon: PROCESS.md §3 п.13, §5.1, §8, §11.4; CONTRIBUTING.md.
Issue: #697
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
show/ship stop paying for diff mutants and for every move of dev:
- scripts/process-track.mjs resolves the track from the current labels and
the diff (show for unlabelled infra, ask for unlabelled product work) and
checks the mechanical ship limits; outside them the pipeline comments and
relabels track:ship -> track:show in the same round.
- Validate on the review material is light on show/ship: a completed push
run on the exact SHA is proof, a dispatch asks mutants=false. ask and the
ci:mutants label keep the mutant dispatch.
- show/ship skip the pre-review rebase when git merge-tree with dev is
clean; the candidate is rebased once at merge and still passes Validate
before the push to dev. The light merge waits for the push run of the
candidate and dispatches only when none appears.
- ship inside the limits merges after the light Validate without a model
review; the issue gets a machine marker hp:ship-merge.
- ship-review.yml + scripts/ship-review.mjs read the code of all ship
tasks of a beta range in one model session and publish
docs/reviews/SHIP-REVIEW-<tag>.md; both beta publication paths refuse a
range with ship tasks the document does not cover or that carries a High.
- show reviews judge correctness and AC; the spec review installs neither
npm ci nor Chromium, the show review installs Chromium only when the issue
names a smoke.
Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, new §11.7; REVIEWER.md, AUTHOR.md and
AGENTS.md digests.
Issue: #696
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
claude[bot]