german/houseplan-card
1
0
Fork 0
mirror of https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card synced 2026-10-02 21:01:21 +00:00
Code Issues Actions 7 Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity
4,039 Commits 73 Branches 245 Tags
24ea7686097b45f212258b8cd1bc2411f736ff61
Commit Graph
19 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claudeandclaude[bot] de3e1f00e1 fix(process): free the reviewer prompt budget, rules stay in REVIEWER.md (#750) 
The code-review prompt sat at exactly 1 400 of its 1 400 words (#634), so
any new line turned the budget test red, and #707/#726 already had to route
their notes through job outputs. Part of the text was dead or a retelling
of the reviewer digest, which #634 says the prompt must not repeat:

- the mutants fragment of the track line: since #709 `mutants` is always
  false, so «прогнаны Validate» was unreachable;
- «Отсутствие мутантов по диффу — не находка» in the show line: a rule of
  every track, already in REVIEWER.md «Трек show» and §10.4;
- three retellings — the repeated round, the gate scope and the severity
  paragraph — now one-line references to the REVIEWER.md sections. The ban
  on a separate issue for an in-scope Medium stays in the prompt: the model
  files issues itself, and that mistake is expensive.

What only the prompt said moves into REVIEWER.md with links to the canon:
the spec delta is the diff of the issue body, a doubt about locality means
a full review with a stated reason, the three smoke-select answers
(docs/TESTING.md), and geometry without invariants in the report is an
unrun gate.

The prompt is now 1 130 words; the 1 400 threshold stays, the difference
is headroom. A new test ties every «docs/process/REVIEWER.md, «X»»
reference in the prompt to an existing `## X` section.

Issue: #750
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-10-01 14:27:08 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] f5a6b47b39 feat(process): the pipeline records model usage in the review document's machine block (#737) 
The weekly process metrics weigh tracks and the nightly ship review in the
order quality, speed, tokens (#707), but the third axis had no source: the
claude-code-action step hides usage from the Actions log on purpose, nothing
read its execution_file, and the #728 reader printed "no data" every week.

scripts/model-usage.mjs is the single module that builds and parses the line:
`<!-- hp:usage input_tokens=N output_tokens=N cache_creation_input_tokens=N
cache_read_input_tokens=N num_turns=N -->` (sums over every model in the last
`result` message, `result.usage` when modelUsage is absent) or
`<!-- hp:usage-none reason=<code> -->`. Only the result message is read; the
rest of the file holds tool results, and no byte of it is printed.

A new step right after Review in both model_review jobs (always(),
continue-on-error) hands the line out as the job output `usage`. Usage is a
reporting figure like the stage duration, so it travels as a job output and
not through the sealed artifact: REQUIRED_FILES and the #556 gate are
unchanged. Publication treats the line as untrusted input and writes the
normalized form as the last line of the anchor block (review-doc-guard
--anchor --usage=) or right after the SHIP-REVIEW block; empty becomes
reason=missing, anything off-format reason=invalid.

The #728 reader now takes the line only from the machine block: a reviewer
quoting the previous round in prose no longer doubles its usage, and
"no data" is counted as missing, never as zero. PROCESS.md §10.4 documents
the source, the format and why it is a job output.

Issue: #737
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-10-01 12:18:13 +00:00
Claude 562313944f fix(process): ship review and beta-derived pushes tell a GitHub refusal from a moved dev (#730) 
After #705 and #723 two more workflow bodies still treated every failed
push as a moved dev: the SHIP-REVIEW publication (_ship-review.yml) retried
three times with "dev went ahead", and the derived-artifacts bot commit
(_beta-derived.yml) told the release manager to rerun the workflow. A
refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a branch
rule, a hook - is cured by neither, and neither step said what GitHub
answered.

Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). A stale lease keeps the old
behaviour: another attempt for the ship review, the rerun advice for the
derived artifacts. Any other outcome stops the step at once: the log gets
the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer
without secrets (--summary, refusalSummary with the new ship-review and
beta-derived labels). The classifier comes from dev, as for the other steps
of these bodies: both jobs check out dev, and the ship review resets to
origin/dev before every attempt. The ship review commit message is built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc, as in #723. The thin callers
ship-review.yml and beta-derived.yml are untouched.

The rebase guard in _process.yml also writes the refusal reason to its step
summary now (--summary, label "rebase"); a stale lease writes none.

test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories (moved dev = a real neighbour
push, GitHub refusal = recorded stderr with a token, a credential URL and
an Authorization header); on the old bodies 10 of its 12 new tests fail.
The #705 execution tests of the rebase guard in rebase-generated.test.mjs
now also read the step summary. PROCESS.md names the two steps next to the

Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] d327ec3d93 feat(process): a failed show verdict re-routes to ask without a fresh budget (#726) 
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.

The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.

The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.

Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 1d51beade1 feat(process): risk by changed hunks decides ship and informs show (#707) 
The ship limits count lines and files but not what was touched: a
12-line pointerdown handler passed them like a typo and merged unread.
The track rule also lived twice - the guard computed the cycle limit in
bash while process-track.mjs computed the track, and the two disagreed
on multiple track labels. The packet still told authors to rebase
show/ship branches that merge cleanly.

- scripts/change-risk.mjs: one pure classifier over `git diff -U0` from
  the merge base. Class A lines only; comments, blank lines and pure
  renames give no risk; deletions do. Area and token rules per class
  (geometry, touch, migration, devices, perf, ux, visual render/ui),
  evidence as path:line, five per class.
- process-track.mjs: owner confirmation is a comment line
  "Трек: <x> — решение владельца" by the repo owner (latest wins, only
  for the current track); several track labels read as the strictest
  with a warning; cycleLimit, guardLimit and rebaseBeforeReview are the
  single source. `stage` makes the whole S7 track decision in one call:
  ship with risk and no confirmation is raised to show with evidence,
  a confirmed ship keeps merging without the model and records the risk
  for the batch review; show/ask get a risk note for the reviewer.
- _process.yml: the guard asks process-track.mjs for the limit and keeps
  no track logic; the track step calls the script once and only
  executes its raise flag and comment file; risk_note reaches the
  Review prompt, ship_risk reaches the hp:ship-merge comment (marker
  line unchanged).
- task-packet.mjs: track basis, limit and rebase policy; next step
  without the stale rebase line; risk with its consequence per track;
  required checks with reasons (ci:golden only on render risk);
  changelog and visual evidence - from the same exports.
- ship-review.mjs: the batch brief prints the risk line of a ship merge.
- Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, §11.7, both digests, AGENTS.md.
- Registry anchors that watched the moved code are moved, not dropped.

Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-10-01 00:03:35 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 0d85807157 fix(process): publish steps tell a GitHub push refusal from a moved branch (#723) 
Two steps publish a commit and treated every failed push as a moved branch:
the release review job (release-review.yml) retried three times with "dev
went ahead", and the review document step (_process.yml) rebased and pushed
again. A refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a
branch rule, a hook - cannot be cured by a retry or a rebase, and the step
never said what GitHub answered.

Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI the rebase guard uses (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). Only a
stale lease (rejected / fetch first / stale info) keeps the old retry or
rebase. Any other outcome stops the step at once, without retries: the log
gets the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer,
both passed through redactSecrets (token, credential URL, Authorization).
The review document step takes the classifier from dev, as the rebase guard
does: a task branch behind dev may not carry it.

The summary text is written by the new --summary option (refusalSummary),
not by a multi-line string in run:, and both commit messages are now built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc (PROCESS.md §10.4 item 4).
release-review.yml is dispatch-only and is not mirrored to main. PROCESS.md
names the rule next to the rebase guard; the #638 trailer witness in
test/release-review.test.mjs follows the line-by-line message.

test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories; only the push transport is
replaced: a moved branch is a real neighbour push, a GitHub refusal is a
recorded stderr carrying a token, a credential URL and an Authorization
header. On the old steps 9 of its 11 tests fail.

Issue: #723
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-30 22:26:44 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] e5c217111c fix(process): a GitHub push refusal is not a stale lease (#705) 
merge-candidate treated any push stderr containing "rejected" as a stale
lease. A `! [remote rejected]` from GitHub itself - in #700 the rebased
candidate changed .github/workflows/ and the conveyor token has no workflow
permission (runs 36484993494, 36487044060) - became "the branch moved after
the reviewed material (#312)", and the stderr was never printed, so the
author was sent to look for a commit that did not exist.

classifyPushRefusal now tells three outcomes apart: a stale lease
(`[rejected] (stale info)`, `fetch first`, a server-side lock race) keeps
the old behaviour; GitHub's workflow refusal (PAT, OAuth App, GitHub App,
bot and integration wordings) and any other `[remote rejected]` get their
own outcome, S6-in-progress and a comment naming the reason. The workflow
comment says what to do: the author rebases and pushes, or the owner grants
the permission. The git answer goes to the log and the comment with tokens
and credential URLs cut out; the merge-step failure comment is redacted too.

The rebase guard in _process.yml parses its push refusal with the same code
(`merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal`): a stale lease is the old error, a
workflow refusal returns the task to S6 without review like a conflict, and
material/reuse/gate skip the rebase that never reached the branch.

Mutant push-refusal-kinds-glued restores the old regex; guard: #705 AC1.

Issue: #705
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-30 20:25:08 +00:00
Claude a8321e32cc process: mutants run only in the nightly full registry; speed rules for ship/show (#709) 
Owner's decision 2026-09-29: mutants check the tests, not the product.
During development they are not run at all — not locally, not in CI,
not by the reviewer. The whole registry is the nightly run
(mutation-gate.yml, #513); a survivor files an issue (#472). The #693
post-mortem: 36 of 57 minutes of a one-line fix went to optional work.

- process-track.mjs: `mutants` is always false (no track, no label).
- classify-changes.mjs: Validate requests no diff mutants on any event;
  the `mutants` input stays so old `-f mutants=…` calls do not fail.
- _process.yml: the default for the gate and the merge is false.
- pre-push-gate.mjs: the manual run no longer runs mutants.
- Canon: PROCESS §2.7 (a mutant is written, not run; `--check` keeps the
  anchors), §5.1 (`ci:mutants` retired), §8 (ship/show: nothing beyond
  gate:small and the spec — one proof per item, no `--smokes` on ship,
  a stray flake is an issue, not an investigation), §10.4; AUTHOR,
  REVIEWER, AGENTS, TESTING.
- Registry: four mutants of the old request rules replaced by
  dev-mutants-requested-again and track-pays-for-mutants-again.

Issue: #709
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-29 23:04:41 +03:00
Claude ae0e516af1 process: a rereview sets S7-code-review again instead of stripping it (#706) 
The label step after integration ran one gh call
`--add-label "$TO" --remove-label "$FROM"`. For the rereview outcome
TO == FROM == S7-code-review, and gh added and removed the same label:
#699 was left without a status and no new round started (run
36491087708).

- scripts/status-label.mjs: the same label is removed and set again
  through relabel from process-reconcile (#555), so the labeled event
  starts the next round and a failed restore fails the step; a
  different label is still one call.
- _process.yml: the step calls the script.
- PROCESS.md: the exact-candidate rule names the relabel.
- test/status-label.test.mjs; mutants rereview-relabel-in-one-call and
  process-label-step-combined-again.

Issue: #706
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-29 07:19:05 +03:00
Claude 8dcc1cad4e docs(process): канон без противоречий, вход автора короче (#701) 
Сверка PROCESS.md, ролевых выжимок, AGENTS.md, TESTING.md, CONTRIBUTING.md
и скриптов по 26 найденным расхождениям (D1–D26): трейлеры по классам
изменений, gate:small как единственный источник состава, пороги ревью,
путь реестра мутантов, golden по ci:golden, порядок чтения промпта ревью.

- scripts/change-classes.mjs: классы A/B/C/D — один модуль для
  process-gate и проверки трейлеров.
- commit-msg: коммит только с файлами класса C (документация) трейлеров
  не требует; указанные трейлеры по-прежнему проверяются.
- Маршрут автора без docs/STATUS.md: 5345 → 4703 слова.
- Промпт ревью читает SCOPE → AGENTS → REVIEWER, как ROUTES.reviewer.

Issue: #701
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-29 00:30:04 +03:00
Claude 2a62ad5b95 process: derived artifacts are accepted on dev once per beta (#697) 
The screenshot fingerprint and golden baselines stop being a tax on every
task branch:

- Task branches no longer commit docs/images/** or golden baselines. On a
  branch the screenshot freshness stays a preflight warning; the review
  prompt, REVIEWER.md and AUTHOR.md drop check-docs as a per-task gate.
- beta-derived.yml refreshes them on dev in one bot commit before the beta
  candidate: canonical docs capture + docs:accept --reviewed, golden from
  the golden-images artifact of a completed Validate on dev +
  golden:accept --reviewed. A changed frame or scene is accepted only when
  named in the inputs; undeclared differences refuse. Baseline commits carry
  Release: and Baseline-Reviewed:; the subject is not a candidate subject.
- classify-changes: the Release: trailer on an issue/* branch no longer
  switches on the heavy set. ci:full / ci:golden do: process-track emits
  full=true, the review gate dispatches Validate with full=true and does not
  accept a light proof.

Canon: PROCESS.md §3 п.13, §5.1, §8, §11.4; CONTRIBUTING.md.

Issue: #697
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-28 23:38:50 +03:00
Claude e1ae8f4ac7 process: the review pipeline prices each round by track (#696) 
show/ship stop paying for diff mutants and for every move of dev:

- scripts/process-track.mjs resolves the track from the current labels and
  the diff (show for unlabelled infra, ask for unlabelled product work) and
  checks the mechanical ship limits; outside them the pipeline comments and
  relabels track:ship -> track:show in the same round.
- Validate on the review material is light on show/ship: a completed push
  run on the exact SHA is proof, a dispatch asks mutants=false. ask and the
  ci:mutants label keep the mutant dispatch.
- show/ship skip the pre-review rebase when git merge-tree with dev is
  clean; the candidate is rebased once at merge and still passes Validate
  before the push to dev. The light merge waits for the push run of the
  candidate and dispatches only when none appears.
- ship inside the limits merges after the light Validate without a model
  review; the issue gets a machine marker hp:ship-merge.
- ship-review.yml + scripts/ship-review.mjs read the code of all ship
  tasks of a beta range in one model session and publish
  docs/reviews/SHIP-REVIEW-<tag>.md; both beta publication paths refuse a
  range with ship tasks the document does not cover or that carries a High.
- show reviews judge correctness and AC; the spec review installs neither
  npm ci nor Chromium, the show review installs Chromium only when the issue
  names a smoke.

Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, new §11.7; REVIEWER.md, AUTHOR.md and
AGENTS.md digests.

Issue: #696
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-28 23:09:46 +03:00
Claude f6c76b7351 process: infrastructure without a track label runs as show (#695 r1) 
CODE-REVIEW-695-r1 Medium: PROCESS §5.1 says an infrastructure task (§1)
without a track label reads as track:show, but neither the pipeline guard
nor the task packet did that.

- _process.yml guard: with no track:* and no small/trivial label, the
  diff of the task branch against dev (compare API) with no class A file
  gives the show cycle limit 2. A truncated compare answer (300 files)
  proves nothing and keeps the limit 4.
- task-packet.mjs: an infrastructure packet names the track it runs on:
  «инфраструктурный · show» without a label, the owner's label otherwise.
- Mutants guard-infra-keeps-ask-limit and
  packet-infra-track-ignores-show-default.

Issue: #695
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-28 22:50:19 +03:00
Claude 57ce10721f process: tracks ship/show/ask are set by the owner's label (#695) 
The analysis of 85 closed tasks #600-#691 showed that the light track
cost as much as the full one (115 min and 12 events vs 102 and 13) and
that the owner had no label to choose the route. The owner accepted the
proposal on 2026-09-28.

- PROCESS §5 is the track table: track:ship (S1 -> S5, one line under
  "## ТЗ", <= 30 src lines, batch review before the beta), track:show
  (default, S2 -> S5, up to three AC, no spec review, 2 code cycles),
  track:ask (full route). The owner's label beats the criteria, which
  become a hint; any agent may raise a track, only the owner lowers it.
- §5.1: ci:full / ci:golden / ci:mutants order heavy checks on any track;
  small and trivial read as track:show, no label as track:ask, an
  infrastructure task as track:show.
- §2, §2.2, §2.4, §2.5, §4, §7.1, §7.2, §9, §11 follow; AUTHOR/REVIEWER
  digests and AGENTS.md follow with the digest test and its mutants.
- task-packet.mjs reports the track via trackFromLabels(); the pipeline
  reads track:show/track:ship for the cycle limit of 2 and lets an
  explicit track:ask win. Pipeline behaviour by track is #696.

Issue: #695
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-28 22:13:21 +03:00
Claude 696f5a789f docs(hygiene): сократить вход агента, у правила — один дом (#680) 
Волна 3 эпика #674. AGENTS.md 650 → 187 строк: карта пакета, маршрут чтения,
правило №1, классы и треки одной строкой со ссылками, трейлеры, рабочие
деревья, хендофф и ожидание вердикта; пересказы PROCESS.md — ссылками на
разделы. Неверный список «Gate jobs» снят (списки jobs не копируются в прозу,
шапка PROCESS.md). Правила, жившие только в AGENTS, получили дом: жёлтый
вердикт при выполненных AC — PROCESS §2.7; свежесть бандла, съёмка только в
Linux (#455, HP_ALLOW_FOREIGN_CAPTURE) и смоки из AC до S7 (#151) —
TESTING.md; причуда демо-стенда и среда-зависимый smoke_opening_measure —
DEVELOPMENT › Smoke tests; отказ публикации без `Release:` и при несвежем
отпечатке бандла, отмена Validate новым пушем, кандидат беты не
promotion-only, fail-closed реестра Labs — DEVELOPMENT; предупреждение и
ошибка свежести скриншотов — CONTRIBUTING.

PROCESS.md: §13 (внедрение с открытым ⏳), §14 (блок со ссылкой на
несуществующий docs/PROCESS.md) и §7.3 (история) удалены. Ссылки «§7.2» на
правило полного разбора после ребейза ведут в §2.10, на сверку SHA перед
выводом — в §2.7; то же в сообщениях scripts/branch-state.mjs,
merge-candidate.mjs, review-doc-guard.mjs, pre-push-gate.mjs, в промпте
_process.yml и TESTING.md. Число `any` в прозе → `node scripts/no-new-any.mjs
--total` (новый режим, юнит-тест; было «1034 в 49 файлах», сейчас 862 в 52),
дата-число замороженного списка якорей монолита снято. Устаревшая команда
пересъёмки скриншотов в §8 заменена ссылкой на действующий путь.

STATUS.md 113 → 61 строка: сгенерированный снимок, текущий цикл и девять
строк решений; Workflow, CI, Toolchain, Tests, Scope, open items и политика
документации — ссылками (PROCESS §2.6, DEVELOPMENT › Release, TESTING);
локали en/ru/de/fr; закрытые «coverage, mypy strict» сняты.

DEVELOPMENT.md: file-sync и «Reproducible scripts» (прототип) удалены;
раздел Release — единственный дом релизной механики: введение, правила
тела стабильного релиза (#328, release:notes), шаг continuity:screencast,
источники версии по release-contract. CONTRIBUTING: ссылка на Release вместо
пересказа, замеры клона без чисел. TESTING: any-гейт — ссылкой на PROCESS §8.

entry-cost: автор 11 125 → 5 407 слов, ревьюер 8 464 → 4 285.

Issue: #680
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-27 22:33:03 +03:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 5a258f3128 docs(hygiene): свести дубли документов подсистем и снять устаревшее (#679) 
Волна 2 эпика #674 — у каждого правила один дом, остальные места ссылаются.

DECOR-EDITOR.md ← BACKDROP.md + LIVE-TEXT.md: один документ с нумерованными
разделами (§3 подложка, §5 текст с живыми значениями), на которые теперь
указывают комментарии кода вместо несуществовавших «BACKDROP §2/§3»;
исправлено утверждение, что space-card не рисует декор (он рисует подложку
и картинки декора, но не фигуры, мебель и текст). LIGHT.md ← матрица
настроек света (перевод, тест назван явно: test/devices.test.mjs «issues
84/88»). DEVICE-PRESENTATION.md ← правила «что показывает маркер» из
FILTERING.md (порядок cover → light sources → device role, шторы,
медиаплееры); «в одном pull request» → «в одном коммите». CANVAS.md: §9.5
«Оптимизировать планы» → CONFIG-COMPATIBILITY.md, overlay и планарные грани
Walls → WALL-THICKNESS.md §10–11, таблицы «было/стало» сняты. TESTING-DEMO.md
→ demo/stand/README.md: карта демо-дома и «чего на стенде нет», ручной
чек-лист снят (ручной фазы в процессе нет). ISOMETRIC.md — только текущее;
история Stage 2/4 — docs/adr/570-isometric-stage4-visual-handoff.md.
SUN.md: удалённый контракт фона снят, правило бумаги — в текущем разделе.
UX-MODES.md: декор над заливками, а не «под комнатами»; «hidden isometric»;
follow-up из #3 — все выпущены. Шапки VACUUM, WARM-REMOUNT («Выровнять всё
по сетке» → «Оптимизировать планы»), WALL-THICKNESS, STYLING-HOOKS,
CONFIG-COMPATIBILITY (#33), PDF-EXPORT — без устаревших статусов и планов.
README EN/RU: абзац про пересъёмку скриншотов → CONTRIBUTING.md, RADAR и
PDF-EXPORT в списке документации, RU догнал EN (2.5D, повторное
использование загруженного изображения, STAIRS). Один список канонических
документов подсистем в AGENTS.md и промпте ревьюера (_process.yml).
WALL-THICKNESS.md ссылается на ADR 282.

Правки src/** и validation.py — только пути документов в комментариях.

Issue: #679
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Fable 5.1 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-27 18:07:37 +00:00
Claude bdac4b4fdc ci: закрепить образ раннера, таймауты job и некруглые cron (#658) 
`ubuntu-latest` с 19.10.2026 переезжает на Ubuntu 26, а golden, скриншоты
документации и перф-бюджеты сняты на текущем образе: все 43 job на раннере
теперь явно на `ubuntu-24.04`, один образ на все workflow. 26 job получили
`timeout-minutes` по наблюдённой длительности с запасом; гейт релиза — 180,
больше суммы собственных ожиданий (60 + 60 + 45). Расписания ушли с круглых
минут (ночь 02:17, мутанты 00:43, метрики 05:23, полный перф 04:11), ночь
пишет в summary сдвиг старта и предупреждает, если он больше часа.

test/workflow-hygiene.test.mjs держит все три правила по тексту workflow
(разбор `parseJobSettings` в scripts/workflow-jobs.mjs) и исполняет шаг
сдвига старта настоящим bash; порядок осознанного подъёма образа —
docs/DEVELOPMENT.md.

Issue: #658
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
 2026-09-27 13:57:21 +03:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 88c4e4e9ae infra(process): bundle and review index change only on the way to dev (#657) 
Решения владельца: 1б — индекс ревью не пересобирается в ветке задачи,
только коммитами, идущими в dev; 2б — бандл меняет только кандидат
беты/релиза, стенд dev берёт его из артефакта Validate.

- scripts/bundle-policy.mjs: коммит, трогающий dist/** или
  custom_components/houseplan/frontend/**, обязан нести Release:
  (хук commit-msg и история в CI через validate-commit-provenance;
  коммиты с датой автора до 2026-09-27 не судятся); --verify судит
  целостность свежей сборки всегда, побайтовую сверку с закоммиченной
  копией — только на коммите, меняющем бандл, или кандидате; --clean.
- release-prerelease: публикация отказывает, если отпечаток исходников
  в закоммиченном манифесте не равен отпечатку дерева (хотфикс поверх
  кандидата без пересборки).
- bundle-sync: по умолчанию только demo/srv/assets; --release
  (npm run bundle:release) — ещё и custom_components.
- rebase-on-dev: конфликт в бандле берёт копию dev, без пересборки
  и amend.
- validate.yml: job dev_build публикует card-bundle головы dev в
  сиротскую ветку dev-build (scripts/dev-build.mjs); стенд накладывает
  её demo/stand/update-dev-bundle.sh.
- _process.yml: индекс ревью больше не пересобирается при приведении
  к dev и при публикации документа в ветку задачи.
- golden-wsl-artifact/golden-container: сборка перед съёмкой не
  считается правкой источника, после — bundle:clean.
- test/bundle-tree-committed: судит закоммиченный снимок, не диск.
- 11 мутантов в реестре; PROCESS/AGENTS/DEVELOPMENT/AUTHOR/REVIEWER.

Issue: #657
User-Visible: no
 2026-09-26 07:28:23 +00:00
Claude baf283c50f ci: thin default-branch callers invoke reusable bodies at @dev (#623) 
Six workflows run from the default branch (issues, schedule, workflow_run):
process, process-resume, process-reconcile, mutation-gate, nightly,
process-metrics. Their bodies move to _<name>.yml (on: workflow_call); the
original files keep only triggers, run-name, permissions, concurrency and one
job `uses: Matysh/houseplan-card/.github/workflows/_<name>.yml@dev` with
`secrets: inherit`. A pipeline change becomes one commit to dev.

- caller job permissions = union of body job permissions (#556 minimum kept
  per job inside the body); caller `if` repeats the body guard for process and
  process-resume so unrelated events stay skipped;
- dispatch inputs forwarded via workflow_call inputs of the same names;
- _mutation-gate.yml keys evidence/marker on job.workflow_sha (the body SHA):
  in a called workflow github.workflow_sha belongs to the caller in main;
- action-pins: narrow exception for this repo's _*.yml at @dev with a reason;
- preflight workflow_sync compares all six thin callers (was 3 of 6);
  performance.yml excluded: its schedule judges main with main's own body;
- tests read bodies from _*.yml; new test/default-branch-workflows.test.mjs;
  six mutants; PROCESS.md §10.4, AGENTS.md, REVIEWER.md updated.

Issue: #623
User-Visible: no
 2026-09-24 10:23:28 +03:00