isDegenerateApexCorner measured the inner-face convergence as
max(h1,h2)/tan(theta/2) — for a 10-degree apex between a 15 cm and a 30 cm
wall that overstates the distance (171.5 cm against the true 128.3/128.9 on
160 cm edges), the corner failed the "inside both edges" test and rendered
as the #329 trident again. Worse, the verdict depended on which neighbouring
edge carried the thicker wall.
The check now intersects the two actual face lines: the meeting point lands
at (hOther + hOwn*cos(theta))/sin(theta) along each edge, degenerate only
when inside both. With equal halves this reduces algebraically to the old
h/tan(theta/2), so equal-thickness verdicts are unchanged by construction —
pinned by the untouched section-4 units and the full golden matrix (136
scenes verified). New units cover both traversal orders of the mixed apex,
the one-point outset tip, the 30-degree ordinary pair and the zero-thickness
guard.
The write path is untouched: P1 forbids new sub-15-degree corners since
issue 329, this is purely how a legacy document renders.
Issue: #339
User-Visible: yes
Accept the complete canonical Linux capture from run 33159459520 after visual
review of View, touch and Device editor surfaces.
Issue: #345
User-Visible: no
Extend the existing localized dialog footer measurements to German at desktop and 320 px. The smoke now checks opening, physical-wall and space dialogs for containment, responsive wrapping and horizontal overflow, closing #348 review r1-M1.
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
Track locale-owned inert and busy state together, preserving the same render contract while keeping the deterministic initial View graph below its hard gzip budget. Refresh generated assets and the documentation fingerprint after the source cleanup.
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
Add Deutsch across all card surfaces and backend flows, backed by the language registry introduced in #62. German loads as a fingerprint-checked page-shared locale chunk so EN/RU remain synchronous and the initial View budget stays intact. Root render gates prevent mixed-language flashes, retry once, and fail open to English. Extend parity, runtime, bundle, browser and visual coverage, plus contributor and user documentation.
Issue: #348
User-Visible: yes
The owner's decision (2026-08-28): optimize is one of the two commands a
client can use to write arbitrary geometry, so it validates its candidate
against the stored document exactly as config/set does — inheritance counted
per rule (repairing a legacy plan with violations still passes; #329 AC10
already proves an honest optimization adds none, so the gate is a no-op for
legitimate flows), while a crafted payload is refused with the stable
junction_limit_<rule> code the except list has been ready for since #329.
The call lives inside the existing executor function, and a successful
optimize refreshes rt.junction_baseline with the candidate's counts so the
next config/set inherits from the cache (#330 §4.2 symmetry).
Import and backup restore stay OUTSIDE the gate on purpose — #329 §3
promises a restore is never blocked. The module docstring stops promising
more than the code does, and spec #329 §5 records the perimeter and the
trade-off explicitly: a crafted import can persist violations, but they are
inherited, never legalised as new ones.
HA tests pin AC1 (crafted spike refused, stored config and rev
byte-unchanged), AC2 (echo-optimize of a stored plan that already carries a
violation passes) and AC3 (the follow-up config/set takes its baseline from
the cache — observed through a recording wrapper). The
junction-limit-optimize-unguarded mutant turns AC1 red through the
backend-test-guard convention.
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
Red dev caught it ninety minutes after the merge: smoke_plan_drawing_repairs
and smoke_resize_pointer_real_plan went red because the new "a 0° wedge is
always a duplicate" rule refused two ordinary edits — creating a room over
an existing partition ring (#308's legal overlay) and resizing a wall until
it lands on a neighbour's. The premise was wrong at the model level: a
shared wall of two adjacent rooms IS two co-located owner atoms on one line,
so every shared-wall node carries a legitimate 0° pair by construction.
Bisection pinned the exact cut: with only the 0° rule reverted, both smokes
are green again; keys, incidence, the iterative walk and fail-closed stay.
Spec revision 4 records the revert and returns "an exact duplicate wall is
invisible to П1" to the status of a KNOWN LIMITATION — an honest detector
needs owner identity, which is a separate decision for the owner to make.
The zero-wedge mutant is removed with its rule; the .5-tick parity unit now
observes quantisation through valence instead of the retired duplicate
visibility; changelogs drop the over-promise.
Issue: #331
User-Visible: yes
Six normative cuts, both mirrors symmetric (spec revision 3):
- §2.1 node keys quantise to 1e-7 with the repository's canonicalisation
formula (sign·floor(|v|·1e7+0.5)/1e7, -0 normalised) — toFixed(6) keys
split one node into two on floating debris and produced two false П4
refusals on a legitimate resize (reproduced: -1e-8 vs 0). Node pairs
within 2e-7 of each other (raw coordinates) are ONE node, and the
node-to-wall incidence uses the same quantum.
- §2.2 a ~0° wedge IS a violation: two rays leaving a node the same way are
a duplicated or overlaid wall (a butt joint yields 180°, never 0°) — the
worst degenerate case was invisible while 0.5° was refused.
- §2.3/§2.4 the wall run is an iterative edge walk over the collinear
component: no recursion (10 000 atoms answered, not RangeError), no
silently dropped fork (the old .find lost every branch but the first),
O(E) by construction, and collinearity is measured against the BASE
segment's axis so an arc of 0.9°-per-atom pieces cannot pose as one wall.
- §2.5 an exception while judging the CANDIDATE refuses the write with the
junction.limit_check_failed toast (fail-closed, as the #278 guard); the
baseline branch stays fail-open by design and the smoke proves the
asymmetry by breaking only the second call of the deterministic pair.
- §2.6 the python mirror narrows its except on the candidate side only:
a genuine migration bug (TypeError) surfaces as an honest WS error, while
a previous-side bug keeps the wide "no baseline" fallback — the two AC6
cases pin the asymmetry so swapped sides turn a unit red.
Parity fixtures gain the new boundary classes (debris node, duplicate wall,
collinear fork); four new mutants pin the filter, the key precision, the
dropped branch and the fail-open hole.
Issue: #331
User-Visible: yes
r2 M-r2-1: AC6 now mirrors AC5's structure with two explicit cases — a
candidate-side TypeError is an honest WS error, a previous-side TypeError
falls back to "no baseline" and the unrelated write passes. An
implementation with swapped or missing asymmetry turns at least one of the
two units red. L2: the risk wording follows §2.3's component-sum phrasing.
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
r1-H1: node keys quantise with the repository's canonicalisation formula
(sign·floor(|v|·1e7+0.5)/1e7) — native Math.round and Python round() part
ways on .5 ticks, the exact parity lesson coordinate-canonicalization
already encodes. r1-M1: the incidence threshold becomes 2e-7 over raw
coordinates, which the spec's own example (1.02e-7) actually satisfies; the
known valence undercount on neighbouring quanta is stated in §3. r1-M2: the
narrow except applies to the candidate side only — a previous-side migration
bug stays a "no baseline" fallback, symmetric with §2.5. r1-M3: the branch
walk is an O(E) edge traversal of the collinear component, not a
combinatorial DFS; AC3 gains a 100-fork case. r1-M4: the USER-GUIDE limits
section documents the new refusal toast. L1: §1 opens with the user
sentence.
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
Quantised node keys with -0 normalisation and node incidence at the quantum,
zero-degree wedges become visible, an iterative maximal-branch wall run, arc
collinearity measured against the chain base, fail-closed candidate checks,
and a narrow except in the python mirror. Every reproduction in §1 was
verified by execution on current dev after #330.
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
Matysh