Every large-house sample mounts a new card that has visited only floors 1
and 2 before the twelve-switch cycle, so the cycle's second step was always
the first visit to floor 3: 20 new clean-floor entries, and in 2.5D one Iso
geometry entry plus one structural build. In large-house-interaction-v1 the
editor series also moves the config epoch that keys the clean-floor cache,
so floor 1 was cold as well. That one cold step was about half of
switchCycleMs, which the README and the cycle comment describe as warmed
navigation, and a 35% warm regression drowned in it.
The runner now visits every fixture floor once in cycle order after the
settings dialog closes, outside every timed and Long Task window, and
returns to floor 2, so the cycle still starts with 2 -> 1. A guard snapshots
the hot caches and the 2.5D structural build counter around the window and
fails the sample when anything grew. Caches an older base lacks read as 0
and its null counter is not judged, so a v1.78.0 base still passes.
Budgets, hardMaxMs, metric names, the report schema, profiles and the
workflow are unchanged. Base and candidate are both measured by the
candidate runner, so the comparison is unaffected; the absolute
switchCycleMs level steps down, which the README now explains. A unit
anchor pins the warm-up position and the guard message.
Issue: #735
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The isometric-stage3-dense-v1 runner still demanded at least one bounded
#651 nudge. Since #713 every raised device tile and lock badge is lifted by
the one shared wall-top rise and carries data-hp-iso-nudged="false", so the
Full Performance profile failed its input contract before any timing.
The contract is inverted: a single nudged raised root now fails the sample,
matching the golden requireOneRise preflight. The performance README states
the current contract, and the #570 runner-contract unit pins the new failure
text.
Issue: #719
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Owner decision of 2026-09-30 in #694. Switching Flat <-> 2.5D is a one-off
General settings change, and since #649 the runner measures a full config
reload for the candidate against a per-device projection flip for v1.77.0,
which alone explains most of 73.8 -> 195.7 ms. The scene build stays gated by
modelReady, firstStableRender and spaceSwitch, a UI freeze by the single
long-task ceiling; the runner still reports viewToggleMs.
Issue: #720
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
- Vertical oblique projection: the floor matrix is the identity and a height
rises straight up by z·sin 20°, so the on-screen wall height is unchanged
and the cos 20° foreshortening of the plan, decor and anchors is gone.
- Device tiles and lock badges stand on the wall-top plane with one common
shift; the #651 placement search no longer runs in the live scene (its
removal is #714). Room names keep their Flat floor point.
- The 2.5D fit no longer reserves the 48 CSS px nudge budget.
- Switching projection keeps the camera when the previous projection was on
screen: saving the setting, entering an editor from 2.5D and adopting a warm
memo from the other projection re-read only the scalar zoom. A cold 2.5D
start still opens the 2.5D home.
- Opening faces are ordered along the oblique projector (s·y + z).
Witness: demo/smoke_iso_flat_parity.mjs (AC2–AC5, AC11) is red on the old code.
Issue: #713
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The full workflow's 7-sample median of firstStableRenderMs for
large-house-interaction-v1 was about 2790 ms across the 1.77 line and
about 2920 ms at v1.78.0 (7d4d75bd: 2925.0; the neighbouring run of the
same SHA read 3144.8). The 3000 ms ceiling sat 2.7 % above the level and
failed on runner noise; #689's 3-sample smoke read 3002.4.
- hardMaxMs 3000 → 3400 in the full profile and its smoke twin (one
number, #473 AC4): +16 % over the 1.78 level, +8 % over the worst run.
The base-relative ratio and noise allowance are unchanged.
- README: the series and the reasoning; the test pins the number and the
series points.
Issue: #692
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
spaceSwitchMs изометрии — одно холодное переключение этажа со сборкой
2.5D-геометрии; он растёт с каждой стадией 2.5D, и потолок 1800 мс из #89
stage 1 стал самим уровнем. Медиана perf-smoke на hosted-раннере:
1500 мс (09-09…09-12, 12 прогонов) → 1668 (09-19…09-25, 6) → 1798 после
#649 (9, σ 42, максимум 1867,7). Попытки одного SHA расходятся на 0,4 %,
разные прогоны одного SHA — до 5,5 %: больше образцов вердикт не меняют,
рычаг — потолок.
2200 мс: +17,8 % над наблюдённым максимумом и ниже единственной настоящей
регрессии окна (2719,6 мс, #583 до решётки, 09-16); удвоение уровня
краснеет с запасом. Одно число в трёх файлах: смок = полный профиль
(#473 AC4), плотный двойник = исторический (#160). Коэффициент и допуск
полного сравнения не тронуты. Обоснование — demo/performance/README.md,
тест закрепляет число и три точки ряда.
Issue: #675
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
- settings.volumetric_view (General settings › Display, third switch) replaces
the alpha entry, the header projection toggle and the phone-menu item; one
rule for card, sidebar page and kiosk; editors stay Flat; backend accepts
only a boolean, support package copies it.
- Raised tiles in 2.5D View: no ring, rounded body min(0.275 D, 0.3 h), edge
0.1 D with the lab filters, ×1.12 size also in layout/collision, lift
0.075 D, one floor-shadow layer under all markers (theme × floor table),
frames hugging tile and edge (Alert > Focus > Selected > Hover), forced
colours without edge and shadow (src/iso-tiles.ts, styles/iso-tiles).
- Soft sun wash instead of projected Flat wedges (src/iso-sun.ts): same gates
and windows as sun_rays, length from elevation, parallelogram along the sun,
tone and streaks by floor lightness, sill line.
- Walls take the user's wall colour (top opaque, sides × .77/.68/.60); theme
rules for walls/openings/labels removed; furniture uses the Flat stroke rule.
- Smokes smoke_iso_tiles/iso_sun/iso_theme_walls/volumetric_setting, 16 new
mutants, acceptance scenes STAGE6_ACCEPTANCE_SCENARIOS (golden with their
Linux CI baselines), ACCEPTANCE.md side by side.
Issue: #649
User-Visible: yes
Относительная половина «Полных бенчмарков» сравнивала кандидата с прошлой
вершиной `main`. Для стабильного релиза это давало круг, в котором гейт не
может покраснеть дважды: прогон идёт только на push в `main`, кандидат обязан
там оказаться, и следующий коммит той же линейки берёт базой первый — то есть
линейку саму. На выпуске v1.76.0 это видно построчно: прогон 35097102695 на
`c3d64789` честно показал resizePreview 603 → 981 и panZoom 91 → 205 в скрытой
изометрии, а прогон на `9683a590` был зелёным и был бы зелёным без всякой
правки бюджетов.
Теперь база выбирается по намерению коммита: head несёт трейлер `Release:` без
пре-релизного суффикса — сравниваем с предыдущим стабильным тегом. Бета,
обычный push и ручной `comparison_ref` не меняются.
Решение вынесено из shell в `scripts/performance-baseline.mjs` по тому же
доводу, что и разбор вердикта ревью (#556): отрицательные случаи — тега нет,
тег стоит на самой голове, база перестала быть предком, база старше
HP-PERF-01 — в YAML не прогнать ни одним тестом. Обращения к git инжектируются,
фикстуры описывают дерево. Отказы по-прежнему уводят в сторону БОЛЬШЕГО
сравнения: непригодная база → родитель → последний достижимый релизный тег.
Проверено исполнением на этом репозитории: стабильный кандидат v1.76.0 →
`2c6410bb` (v1.75.0); бета v1.76.0-beta.5 и обычный push → `push before`;
dispatch с `comparison_ref=v1.74.0` → `e63460f0`.
Свидетели: `test/performance-baseline.test.mjs` (10 проверок, включая AC2 —
второй коммит линейки не сравнивается сам с собой) и мутант
`stable-candidate-compares-against-itself`, который возвращает прежнее
поведение и обязан краснеть; проверено подменой руками — AC2 падает, оригинал
проходит.
AC4: других релизных гейтов, судящих о родителя, нет. `validate.yml` берёт
`github.event.before` только для ДИАПАЗОНА файлов, и там база уже заменена
доказанно зелёным предком (#387/#388), а не сырым родителем.
npm test 2731/2730/0 fail, typecheck чистый, check-docs зелёный (кроме
известного отпечатка скриншотов, #586).
Issue: #587
User-Visible: no
Полные бенчмарки кандидата v1.76.0 (прогон 35097102695, SHA c3d64789) против
v1.75.0 покраснели на двух скрытых изометрических профилях:
| метрика | v1.75.0 | v1.76.0 | предел |
|---|---|---|---|
| large-house-isometric resizePreview | 603 | 981.4 | 753 |
| large-house-isometric panZoom | 90.8 | 205.2 | 150.8 |
| stage3-dense stateUpdate | 77.5 | 169.1 | 152.5 |
| stage3-dense resizePreview | 582.5 | 765.6 | 732.5 |
| stage3-dense panZoom | 90.6 | 171.7 | 150.6 |
Шаг настоящий и объяснённый: #583 добавил скрытому 2.5D-виду геометрии, а
поиск свободного места для подписей даже после ускорения решёткой стоит вдвое
дороже, чем до #583. Абсолютные потолки не тронуты и держатся с запасом
(panZoom 205 при 600, resize 981 при 2200); все семь пользовательских профилей
зелёные — регрессия целиком внутри вида за `hp_alpha`.
Решение владельца 2026-09-16: принять. Рычаг — допуск в миллисекундах, а не
коэффициент: он покрывает разовый сдвиг уровня и продолжает ловить рост от
нового уровня, тогда как поднятый коэффициент разрешил бы удвоение навсегда.
Значения одинаковы у обоих профилей — контракт #160 требует, чтобы плотный
двойник Stage 3 делил с историческим профилем каждый общий потолок, и тест
`performance-workflow` это стережёт.
Допуски временные. #585 переписывает поиск на перебор границ препятствий
вместо скана диска 48 px; когда он приедет, значения возвращаются к 150/60/75.
Тест `performance-budget` фиксирует и числа, и то, что наблюдённый шаг проходит,
а следующий такой же — уже нет.
Честно о границе метода: сравнение идёт с ПРЕДЫДУЩЕЙ вершиной main, а она уже
несёт эту же линейку, поэтому следующий прогон был бы зелёным и без правки
бюджетов. Правка сделана не ради зелёного прогона, а чтобы принятый уровень был
записан явно и проверялся тестом. Отдельно завожу, что базой стабильного
кандидата должен быть предыдущий стабильный тег, а не вершина main.
npm test 2721/2720/0 fail.
Issue: #585
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.76.0
#500 gave `_serverCfg` and `_layout` prototype accessors but left them in
`static properties`. Lit marks such a property `wrapped` and, on the FIRST
update, force-writes it into `changedProperties` with an `undefined` old
value even though nobody assigned anything (`reactive-element.js:249-252`
and `:880-886`). `willUpdate` reads that as a config replacement, raises
`_cfgEpoch`, the memoized model key changes, and a 60-room house builds and
paints its model a second time: measured 19 update cycles, 4 builds and 4
epochs against 18 / 3 / 3 before #500, worth ~550 ms of `modelReadyMs` and
the same on `firstStableRenderMs` (3355 against a 3000 ceiling).
The declaration goes; the bodies stay reactive through the owner —
`_adoption` → `onBodyReplaced` → `requestUpdate(field, previous)` — which
needs no declaration: `getPropertyOptions` falls back to the default and
`changed.has('_serverCfg')` works as before. `noAccessor: true` would not
help, `wrapped` is set before that flag is read. The trap is written above
`static properties`, where someone would put the declaration back.
`cache.entries.cleanFloor` returns to 100 in both interaction budgets: the
120 entries were the extra epoch re-keying the per-room cache, not a
property of the design — the reasoning in 914e8402 was wrong.
Witness: test/config-adoption-ownership.test.mjs pins that neither body is
declared; the mutant `adoption-bodies-declared-reactive` puts the
declaration back and reddens it.
The boot diagnostics of the previous three commits touch four private
members, so they are declared in the performance contract: `_buildModel` and
`_cfgEpoch` outright (both exist in every supported comparison base), and the
adoption entry point as a current/legacy pair — #500 turned the private
`_adoptStructuralResponses` into the public `_adoptAuthoritative`, and an
undeclared rename would have the counter report zero adoptions instead of
failing.
The same commits carried a `node_modules` symlink: `.gitignore` had the
pattern with a trailing slash, which does not cover a symbolic link, and
`git add -A` in a sandbox worktree committed it. The link is removed and the
pattern loses the slash; a mutant run on this branch failed with `EEXIST` on
it.
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
The pre-release perf gate of the v1.74.0-beta.1 candidate reported
cache.entries.cleanFloor 120 against a ceiling of 100 (run 34480302982,
large-house-interaction-v1). The ceiling was calibrated when only the visible
space populated `_cleanFloorCache`; since #509 the summary panel computes the
clean-floor total in per-room slices through the same cache, so the sixty
fixture rooms are cached under both config epochs the interaction profile
creates — 60 × 2 = 120, exactly what the run measured.
The ceiling moves to 180 in the smoke and in the full interaction profile:
one entry per room per epoch with room for a third epoch, far below the LRU
cap of 600 and far below anything a per-frame or per-marker regression would
produce. The leak detector is untouched: cacheGrowth.cleanFloor stays 0.
Issue: #509
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.74.0-beta.1
The gate used to require every Validate run on the tag SHA to be green:
a cancelled duplicate or a red flake that a later re-run had fixed kept
the stable release blocked (v1.73.0, 09.09 — released by hand). Now the
verdict comes from the newest run that was not cancelled: not completed →
wait, success → pass, anything else → fail, no run → wait. The same rule
is documented for the perf workflow and the release runbook.
Mutants: release-gate-counts-cancelled-runs, release-gate-oldest-run-wins.
Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
The #160 contract test keeps the dense profile's longTasks block equal to
the historical isometric one, and both profiles boot through the same lazy
iso-scene-render chunk; the accepted split applies to both. Validate
34356856702 caught the divergence.
Issue: #507
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0
Full Performance of the v1.73.0 stable candidate against the v1.72.0 product
(run 34354409872) was red on one check of the isometric profile:
longTask.countP95 16 → 20 against max(16×1.2, 16+3) = 19.2, with every
timing, longTask.totalP95Ms and longTask.maxSingleMs green. The trace behind
#506 shows why: since v1.73.0-beta.1 the isometric renderer is the lazy
iso-scene-render chunk (#160 Stage 3), so the single v1.72.0 boot task is
split in two around that import — the same work, +2 tasks.
Owner decision 2026-09-09: accept the split. countNoiseAllowance 3 → 5 for
large-house-isometric-v1 only; the ratio, the hard ceiling, total and
maximum single task keep gating real growth. The downloaded CI artefact
re-evaluated with this budget passes (limit 21, actual 20, no failures).
Documented in demo/performance/README.md; the budget test pins the
allowance and the untouched profiles.
Issue: #507
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0
Классификация changes вынесена в scripts/classify-changes.mjs (выходы
perf_iso/perf_interaction, fallback --all). performance_smoke добавляет
large-house-isometric-v1 при правке src/iso-* и large-house-interaction-v1
при правке живого пути, по 3 образца против hardMaxMs полных профилей
(budgets-*-smoke.json). Набор профилей входит в ключ reuse. PROCESS.md §8.
Issue: #473
User-Visible: no
