Commit Graph
22 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot] 3e4e549b56 docs: code review r2 for #146
Issue: #146
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 14:52:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 84cd5f9331 docs: review document for #146
Issue: #146
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 14:38:19 +00:00
claude[bot] ab2a014568 docs: spec review r1 for #146
Issue: #146
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 13:47:32 +00:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 1937c32572 docs: review document for #140
Issue: #140
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 16:08:32 +03:00
claude[bot] d66cd2ebab docs: review document for #138
Issue: #138
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 12:59:09 +00:00
claude[bot] aad625a84d docs: review document for #138
Issue: #138
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 12:59:09 +00:00
claude[bot] f11a4e1085 docs: review document for #141
Issue: #141
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 12:11:08 +00:00
claude[bot]andclaude[bot] b860ef4c43 docs: spec review for #141
Issue: #141
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 12:11:08 +00:00
Matysh de46db3343 docs: restore exact wording in the moved #89 spec review
One word was mistyped while transferring the file: "на каждый HA state
update" instead of "на каждом". The moved document must match the original
byte for byte.

Issue: #142
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 11:50:54 +03:00
Matysh 8eb4bab7c6 docs: file reviews where reviews live, retire the #89 draft, honest markers
Three review documents sat in the repository root, committed before the pipeline
existed and before docs/reviews/ did. The directory exists now and the pipeline
writes into it, so they move there and the root stops being a second place to
look.

The #89 spec had a twin: the research draft next to the normative stage1
document, two files for one issue. The draft goes to legacy — it fed the
decisions and is worth keeping, but nothing should read it as current.

ROADMAP.md carried a live link to the Project v2 board that was dropped
yesterday; missed then because the sweep grepped for status-canon wording, not
for every link. And docs/README.ru.md said "verified against v1.60.0" as if
that were fresh — the line is now an explicit warning naming what to trust
instead: USER-GUIDE.ru.md and the changelogs.

Issue: #142
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 11:40:26 +03:00
claude[bot]andclaude[bot] 5bebc26aeb docs: review document for #137
Issue: #137
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 08:27:45 +00:00
claude[bot] f1e6cca3db docs: code review document for #107 (r1, red)
Issue: #107
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 00:51:58 +00:00
claude[bot] b7b28ee579 docs: review document for #107
Issue: #107
User-Visible: no
2026-08-14 00:02:41 +00:00
claude[bot]andclaude[bot] 9ad2b3b4ef docs: spec review document for #131 (r1, green)
Issue: #131
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 23:28:19 +00:00
claude[bot] 0e69c4a183 docs: code review document for #122 (r2, green)
Issue: #122
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 22:27:31 +00:00
claude[bot] e13215c02f docs: code review document for #122 (r1, red)
Issue: #122
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 22:04:00 +00:00
claude[bot] 4c73e2ccdb docs: review document for #122
Issue: #122
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 21:04:32 +00:00
claude[bot]andclaude[bot] e93c405b13 docs: code review document for #123
Issue: #123
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 18:55:49 +00:00
claude[bot]andclaude[bot] 7af4146614 docs: review document for #123
Issue: #123
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 18:55:49 +00:00
claude[bot] cc3b0f12f2 docs: review document for #89
Issue: #89
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 13:34:19 +00:00
claude[bot] e0ddbcd79e docs: review document for #89
Issue: #89
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 12:53:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 6d61529168 docs: review document for #89
Issue: #89
User-Visible: no
2026-08-13 11:05:29 +00:00