Validate on the conveyor's rebase eb439e81 failed preflight: the branch
changes visual sources (stairs), so the screenshot check is strict on it,
and the fingerprint was stale against the moved dev (#739, #742, #759).
The branch is rebased onto b84465e5 (inventory counts merged with #742:
lifecycle 89, total 204/200) and `docs:accept --identical` re-captured
all 11 frames: pixel-identical, only the source fingerprint moves.
Issue: #740
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
A floor with stairs pays for them on every switch to it: the stair layer
is emptied on other floors, so Lit recreates every symbol on each return
and the browser lays out and paints it again. With 250 stairs (the
large-house fixture, the per-floor limit) that was 2,875 SVG elements and
about 40 ms per entry locally; each stair carried 3-7 separate tread lines
with four bound coordinates each.
The treads of one stair are now a single <path class="hp-stair-tread">
with one `M a L b` subpath per tread, in geometry order and with the
numbers the lines carried. Treads of one stair never overlap (straight:
parallel, >= 20 cm apart; spiral: inner ends >= 6.7 cm apart at the
3.6 cm stroke), so the path paints the same pixels at any opacity. The
outline points and the tread data are built once per cached geometry
object (cachedStairMarkup, weak keys), not on every render. The View and
plan-editor layers share the strings; outline, hit polygon, trapezoid,
arrow, attributes and handlers are unchanged. Floor 1 of the fixture
drops from 4,210 to 2,960 elements.
Witnesses: the unit test for the path data and its cache, and the
smoke_stairs markup checks in View and in the plan editor, are red on
dev. The stairs-view-tread-lines mutant restores the View lines.
Issue: #740
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
Five places still described the pipeline as it was before code that is
already in dev:
- the S3 hint of the task packet told the author to push the branch, while
the spec lives in the issue body (§2.3, #517) and nothing is pushed
before S5 (§11.8);
- process-gate printed «FAIL п.9 Gates: light» for a trailer nobody writes
or reads, while §10.2 item 9 is the unimplemented release:prerelease
verdict check. The check is removed; a contract test ties every RULES key
to an implemented item of §10.2 and every finding number to a RULES key;
- §10.4 item 4 demanded a heredoc in run:, while #723/#730 and their tests
demand the opposite: commit messages echo line by line into a file,
comment and summary texts come from code;
- the ship merge comment, AUTHOR.md, REVIEWER.md and AGENTS.md named only
the pre-beta document, though since #727 the night reads ship code first;
- the nightly publication committed «docs: ship review for nightly …
перед бетой» with the beta step's Issue: #696. It now has its own
subject (the document name), body and Issue: #727; the beta message is
unchanged.
The browser-guard inventory note still said growth above 200 fails
mutation-gate --check; since #699 it is a guideline and --check warns. Its
counts now match the inventory: 205, lifecycle 90.
Issue: #748
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
`.room { transition: 0.12s }` interpolates a room's colour and its
fill-opacity / stroke-opacity independently, and the visible opacity is their
product. The states without a fill kept their alpha in the colour with the
default opacity 1 (.overlay transparent, .yard rgba 0.14, .outlined rgba
0.06 / 0.55, .picked rgba 0.25), while .styled writes an opaque colour plus
fill-opacity: var(--room-fill-op). On a change between the two on the same
node one half rose while the other fell, and mid-way the room was darker than
at either end. Opening the space settings on a floor with no fill (the dialog
shows "no fill" as its own colour at alpha 0) flashed every room grey for
~0.1 s, 0 -> 0.241 -> 0; cancelling the dialog after a preview, entering and
leaving the plan editor briefly darkened the fill (0.18 -> 0.317 -> 0.06).
Every .room state now writes an opaque colour plus *-opacity, and
transparent only together with a zero opacity. The transition itself,
.styled and the --room-* variables are unchanged; the space card takes the
same styles. The resting paint is the same: the witness records each state's
colour and visible opacity as dev drew them, and screenshots of seven resting
states (View without fill, with fill and borders, plan editor, room picked for
a merge, yard with and without borders, yard in the plan editor) are
pixel-identical to dev outside the plan editor's tool hint, whose text shifts
by a sub-pixel between runs on dev too.
Witness: new demo/smoke_room_fill_transitions.mjs, deterministic. A
MutationObserver pauses the room's transitions at their first frame right
after Lit commits, and the smoke seeks them through 0..120 ms in 15 ms steps.
Red on dev: fill overshoot 0.241 / 0.125 / 0.137 / 0.134 on the four paths,
stroke 0.241 / 0.242 on the first two. A real colour change of the same room
still runs a fill transition (catches `transition: none`).
A card-mod rule that sets only `fill` on an unfilled room now meets
fill-opacity 0; CHANGELOG and STYLING-HOOKS say to set the opacity with the
colour (the values are generated, STYLING-HOOKS §3.3).
Issue: #746
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
The code-review prompt sat at exactly 1 400 of its 1 400 words (#634), so
any new line turned the budget test red, and #707/#726 already had to route
their notes through job outputs. Part of the text was dead or a retelling
of the reviewer digest, which #634 says the prompt must not repeat:
- the mutants fragment of the track line: since #709 `mutants` is always
false, so «прогнаны Validate» was unreachable;
- «Отсутствие мутантов по диффу — не находка» in the show line: a rule of
every track, already in REVIEWER.md «Трек show» and §10.4;
- three retellings — the repeated round, the gate scope and the severity
paragraph — now one-line references to the REVIEWER.md sections. The ban
on a separate issue for an in-scope Medium stays in the prompt: the model
files issues itself, and that mistake is expensive.
What only the prompt said moves into REVIEWER.md with links to the canon:
the spec delta is the diff of the issue body, a doubt about locality means
a full review with a stated reason, the three smoke-select answers
(docs/TESTING.md), and geometry without invariants in the report is an
unrun gate.
The prompt is now 1 130 words; the 1 400 threshold stays, the difference
is headroom. A new test ties every «docs/process/REVIEWER.md, «X»»
reference in the prompt to an existing `## X` section.
Issue: #750
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
A same-route remount that cannot edit yet - hass arrives after the
element is inserted (the demo's own order), or a non-admin waits for the
server's can_write - keeps the editor in _pendingNavMode and enters it
later through _resumePendingNavMode -> _setMode. The draft revival was
wired only into the immediate warm adoption (_requestMode(..., adopt)):
on the pending path the draft was lost, _warmRevivePending stayed up for
the instance's life, _warmSnapshot stopped writing dlg, and the next
remount brought back the predecessor's stale draft.
The adoption tail (draft revival once under a held refit, then the
settled stage as the refit baseline) is shared by both paths: the
sequencing lives in src/warm-mode-adoption.ts, the refit bookkeeping in
the card's _holdWarmRefit/_releaseWarmRefit. The pending mode still enters through _setMode, the transition
authority smoke_nav_persist holds it to; resumeWarmMode then settles the
revival. _setMode ends the passive boot grace and refits the camera to
a header measured before the editor chrome rendered, so a camera the
pending window left untouched is put back and held exactly as an
immediate adoption holds it; a camera that has already moved on (View
refit, the user's pan, another space) is left to the ordinary refit. A
mode that did not commit, an explicit mode command in the pending window
and a route departure settle the revival too: no outcome leaves
_warmRevivePending up. The core file gives back 4 lines.
smoke_warm_dialogs gains section H through the UI: the three late-write
orders keep mode, draft, dirty baseline and a frame-by-frame identical
viewport; the chain carries this instance's draft, not the predecessor's;
a space switch in the pending window eats the draft. 14 checks are red
on dev. The mutant warm-pending-mode-leaves-revive-waiting is guarded by
the smoke; docs/WARM-REMOUNT.md §2 describes the pending editor.
Issue: #756
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
claude[bot]