Commit Graph
2945 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Claudeandclaude[bot] a0f72280ee fix(plan): key room shapes by space and id so a floor switch never repaints a stranger (#742)
The flat room list was a bare map(), so Lit reused room nodes by position.
On a floor switch the previous floor's room node became the new floor's room
and `.room { transition: 0.12s }` drew its fill and stroke in from the old
computed values: one paper-white frame, then two or three frames darker than
the final fill (alpha rises while fill-opacity falls), then the fill. Between
two filled floors the fill bled in from the other floor's colour.

The list is now keyed(space.id, repeat(rooms, (r, i) => r.id || i, ...)), the
shape #534 settled on for openings and markers. The outer key handles the
floor switch, including room ids repeated on two floors (ids are unique only
within a space); the inner key keeps a node bound to its room inside a space,
where inserts, merges, splits and the editor filter shift positions. An
id-less room keys by its numeric index, which never equals a string id. The
transition itself stays: it smooths hover and a real fill change on the same
floor.

Witness: a new section of smoke_space_switch_transitions, before physicalize
(after it the first room changes template branch and the node is recreated
anyway). Red on dev: five transitions on g1, node r1 reused for g1, computed
fill rgba(0, 0, 0, 0) / 1; room nodes swapped by an insert; same-id case
reuses r1. A real custom_fill change still runs a fill transition (catches
`transition: none`). Two mutants: inner key removed, outer key removed.

Issue: #742
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 10:13:50 +00:00
claude[bot] 88985d2e4c docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#739)
Issue: #739
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 10:06:38 +00:00
claude[bot] c629c9c238 docs: review document for #739
Issue: #739
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 10:06:38 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 9324d81b5f perf(iso): keep the theme paper across floor switches in 2.5D (#739)
In 2.5D with a backdrop image every floor switch rendered the card twice
before the first frame. The paper key of the first-frame state (#654)
held the space id, so each switch cleared the ready paper: the first
render inserted the loading veil, updated() probed the computed card
background with a temporary span and asked for a second full update,
which removed the veil again. The colour itself never changed: it is the
theme card background, and no space sets those variables. Locally this
second pass was about 50 ms per warm switch on the large house.

The paper under a backdrop is now resolved once per theme identity
(dark mode, default and dark default theme, theme) and card mode. The
state keeps the resolved paper of the current theme and mode beside the
current paper, so a floor with a backdrop is ready in prepare() when that
paper is known -- also after a drawn floor in between -- and the switch
renders once: no veil, no probe, no second update. A drawn plan keeps its
white paper without the DOM. Any change of the theme identity or the
mode, also one made in Flat or in an editor, drops the kept paper, so the
first backdrop floor after load, a theme change and a trip to an editor
take the #654 path unchanged. isoPaperContext still takes the floor; it
deliberately leaves it out of the identity.

Witnesses: the #739 unit test is red on dev at "a floor switch shows no
veil" and on a key-only variant (space dropped, no theme cache) at
"drawn -> backdrop keeps the known theme paper"; the new
smoke_iso_floor_switch is red on dev (2 updates, 1 colour probe and a
veil insertion in every click task). The iso-paper-resolved-per-floor
mutant puts the floor back into the theme identity.

Issue: #739
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 10:06:38 +00:00
claude[bot] 37238f3990 docs: review document for #744
Issue: #744
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 10:04:12 +00:00
claude[bot] 8b7725acb1 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#729)
Issue: #729
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 08:57:25 +00:00
claude[bot] c84c430b2e docs: review document for #729
Issue: #729
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 08:57:19 +00:00
Claude 0e44f8a69f feat(process): a track:ask draft may be written during the spec review (#729)
On track:ask every spec review round is 10-45 minutes of waiting, and
rule #1 kept the author idle for all of it. Rule 10 (#738) judges a
class A commit by its author date, so code written in the
S4-spec-review epoch was always refused: nothing told a draft written
against the reviewed text from a violation. The owner allowed changing
rule #1 for this (decision 2026-10-01).

A draft commit carries `Spec-Draft: sha256:<issueBodyDigest(body)>`,
the hash the pipeline already writes as "Тело issue" into the review
document anchor. Rule 10 accepts a class A commit written in S4 only
when its S4 epoch (a repeated S4 does not restart it) was closed by
S5-ready, the track at the author date was ask, and the trailer equals
the body of the green, High 0 SPEC-REVIEW added inside that epoch, read
from the range head or origin/dev. The first failing check is the one
finding: trailer format, track, how the epoch ended, the missing
document with a `git fetch origin dev` hint, or both hashes and the
document name. A trailer on a commit written in an allowed epoch is a
warn. Without the document reader rule 10 is exactly #738; main always
passes one, and it reads git only when the range holds a draft.

The task packet tells S4 on ask that a local draft is allowed while the
branch stays closed, prints the trailer line, and in S5/S6 names the
green spec review, whether the body changed since, and the --report
check before push. SPEC-REVIEW documents are a separate input
(specDocs) from the branch and origin/dev, so the previous verdict and
the AC witness keep their source.

PROCESS.md gets §11.8 and the points that refer to it (§1, §2.4-2.6,
§3 item 1, §7.2, §9, §10.2 item 10, §12); AUTHOR.md, REVIEWER.md and
AGENTS.md follow, with three new key rules in process-digests. The
pre-push hook fixture copies the modules process-gate now imports.

Issue: #729
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 11:47:01 +03:00
claude[bot] 7ff2b5aeaa docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#731)
Issue: #731
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 06:47:05 +00:00
claude[bot] 4097132374 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#731)
Issue: #731
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 06:47:05 +00:00
claude[bot] a729b5000d docs: review document for #731
Issue: #731
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 06:47:05 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 36ebabaaec fix(moon): the status line after a warm revive of General settings (#731)
#718 K7 takes the moon status once per opening of General settings,
outside the draft. A warm remount revives the open dialog on a new card
instance, but `_warmReviveDialog` restored only the draft: the new
instance had no opening of its own, so the "Now: ..." line never came
back.

A revive is an opening too. The `settings` branch now asks for the
status the way `_openSettingsDialog` does - through the lazy editor
runtime (`_openMoonStatus` -> `openMoonStatus`): at once when the
runtime is there (an editor revives after `_requestMode(..., adopt)`
has installed it), after it loads in View; once per revive and only
while that revived dialog is still open. The snapshot of now,
`hass.config` and `sun.sun` is the revive's own, nothing of the dead
instance's opening is carried over, the draft key and the dirty flag do
not change. The View graph gets no static moon-status import; other
dialog kinds never ask for the moon chunk.

demo/smoke_moon_status.mjs gains the revive scenarios - View, the plan
editor, a revive while the chunk is still loading, a space-dialog
revive that must not load the chunk; the first three are red on dev.
test/moon-settings.test.mjs executes the revive as a new opening; the
wiring itself is proven by the smoke, not by reading the monolith as
text (#624). docs/SUN.md and docs/WARM-REMOUNT.md say a revive is an
opening; scripts/smoke-links.mjs links the two new symbols to the smoke.

Issue: #731
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 06:47:05 +00:00
claude[bot] de117d5042 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#735)
Issue: #735
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 06:41:26 +00:00
claude[bot] 6372c21eec docs: review document for #735
Issue: #735
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 06:41:26 +00:00
claude[bot] b417ec4c9e docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#741)
Issue: #741
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:59:54 +00:00
claude[bot] 15f8da8563 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#741)
Issue: #741
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:59:54 +00:00
claude[bot] d87f834448 docs: review document for #741
Issue: #741
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:59:54 +00:00
claude[bot] f559b3fe19 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#736)
Issue: #736
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:56:05 +00:00
claude[bot] 90ea1cab84 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#736)
Issue: #736
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:56:05 +00:00
claude[bot] 9debce3394 docs: review document for #736
Issue: #736
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:56:05 +00:00
claude[bot] 7cb90e379b docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#738)
Issue: #738
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:52:18 +00:00
claude[bot] df8482c702 docs: review document for #738
Issue: #738
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:52:18 +00:00
claude[bot] bc59917ea4 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#718)
Issue: #718
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:38:09 +00:00
claude[bot] c39a8fe88e docs: review document for #718
Issue: #718
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:38:04 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] b0751497d4 test(moon): judge the editor after the mode transition; fresh screenshot fingerprint (#718)
Validate on the conveyor's rebase 98d98e83 was red twice over:

- smoke_moon_static ac5_noMoonInTheEditor sampled the plan editor two
  frames after `setMode('plan')`, while the View -> editor transition (#101)
  was still running and the sky layer was legitimately fading out. Locally
  2 of 3 runs red on 98d98e83. The check now waits for the transition to
  end (no `_modeTransitionBusy`, no `mode-transition` class) and turns red
  if it never does; 5 of 5 runs green.
- the branch changes visual sources, so the screenshot check is strict on
  it, and #725 moved the sources under the fingerprint. `docs:accept
  --identical`: all 11 frames pixel-identical, only the fingerprint moves.

Issue: #718
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 05:25:21 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] c2ca6a55d2 docs(screenshots): source fingerprint for #718 — all frames pixel-identical
`npm run docs:accept -- --identical` (no prior docs:capture): the local
capture of all 11 documentation frames decoded pixel-identical to the
committed PNGs, so only the source fingerprint moves. None of the frames
shows the General settings dialog (the new moon status line) or a static
background at night (the new moon sky layer); the PNGs stay byte-for-byte.

Issue: #718
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 05:25:21 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] b998b0b34a feat(moon): the moon with any background, and its status in General settings (#718)
The owner decided on 30.09 that the moon is not part of the "Follow the Sun"
environment but a switch of its own: with a static background (global or a
space's own) the card showed no moon even with the switch on, and the switch
said nothing about why the moon was missing right now.

With a static background there is no environment, so the moon stands in its
own layer, `.hp-moon-sky`: the first child of `.stage` / `.hp-static-stage`,
the whole scene, no z-index, filter or will-change, under the plan by DOM
order, fading with the #101 View weight. Inside is the very #661 element, so
place, size, art and fades are unchanged, and a background switch moves it to
its new parent in the same render without a flicker. The phase comes from the
same `resolveDayCycle`, computed only while the moon is on and on View; without
`sun.sun` both cards keep their 30 s clock ticker and re-render only when the
phase changes (the environment is still compared by its whole fingerprint).

General settings get a second caption line under the moon switch
(`data-moon-status`): one snapshot per opening, judged by the lazy chunk as if
the switch were on, first reason wins (no home, day, below 3°, under 3 %),
numbers rounded and clamped below the threshold they missed. `moonStatus`
decides "shown" with the same `moonShownAt` as the element. It lives in a
WeakMap beside the draft, so it never makes the dialog dirty; a closed
opening's result is dropped. The dialog loads the chunk through the gate's
loader (`withMoon`), now shared by every caller while a load is in flight, so
there is still one fingerprint check and one retry token.

Bundle (same build, against origin/dev): initial View 300 072 -> 300 248 B gzip
(+176 B, under the 500 B of the spec; budget and ceiling not raised); lazy
editor 238 558 -> 238 991 B (+433 B, the line and English strings); lazy moon
11 385 -> 11 712 B (+327 B, layer CSS and status). `src/moon.ts` stays out of
the initial and the editor graph; bundle-budget now refuses an editor/moon
overlap. Monolith metrics: hostRefs 4 885 -> 4 888 — the three `host.` reads of
`src/editors/moon-status.ts` (hass, `_settingsDialog`, requestUpdate) through
its own three-member interface, not the editor port; the other five metrics
are unchanged. houseplan-editor-runtime.ts grows by two lines (import, call).

Tests: AC9/AC10/AC15 and the sky layer in test/moon.test.mjs (the #661
"static -> nothing" check inverted), AC14 and the opening lifecycle in
test/moon-settings.test.mjs, smokes demo/smoke_moon_static.mjs (AC1-AC6; AC1
and AC3 were red on dev) and demo/smoke_moon_status.mjs (AC11/AC12), AC7 in
smoke_daycycle_layer_budget. Golden: two new scenes
(static-bg-moon-gibbous-white-light, static-bg-moon-crescent-south-dark,
matrix v70), the harness checks the moon's parent by background and waits for
the status line in the General settings frames. Four new mutants; the clock
ticker one is a browser guard (201 at the guideline of 200).

Issue: #718
User-Visible: yes
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 05:25:21 +00:00
claude[bot] 712d41b6d6 docs: review document for #729
Issue: #729
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:23:15 +00:00
claude[bot] 76558bf2a0 docs: review document for #742
Issue: #742
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:14:49 +00:00
claude[bot] 0621d53a49 docs: review document for #740
Issue: #740
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:11:55 +00:00
claude[bot] bb25110dc4 docs: review document for #739
Issue: #739
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:08:55 +00:00
claude[bot] f3cfb93e94 docs: review document for #737
Issue: #737
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:07:59 +00:00
claude[bot] b27ae06ef8 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#730)
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:03:39 +00:00
claude[bot] 7126fd8a02 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:03:35 +00:00
claude[bot]andClaude 02dce77c98 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#730)
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:42 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 53bb3bf453 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 0ab685e380 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 8e42f4e972 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot] 3b9f25ea65 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#727)
Проверка (CI) / Предполёт: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Бандл головы dev для стенда (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Геометрия: TS/Python parity исполнена (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Доказательство выполненных проверок (push) Canceled after 0s
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] cf8b8f0307 docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] d5bca5dee5 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#727)
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] 61d98158ce docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] e58d7d06f8 feat(process): nightly ship batch review, reused by the beta gate by patch set (#727)
Ship tasks merge without a model review and their code was first read by
the batch review right before a beta: one session over the whole range,
ten to forty-five minutes on the release path, days after the merge. The
gate also knew a single document (SHIP-REVIEW-<tag>.md) and covered tasks
by number only, so a commit that landed after the review under the same
trailer still counted as read.

- scripts/ship-review.mjs: the patch set of a task is the sorted
  `git patch-id --stable` of its range commits, without `Release:`
  commits (the beta candidate carries every Issue: of the line) and
  commits touching only docs/reviews/**; the diff options are explicit
  so a local git config cannot change it. shipCoverage rates every ship
  task from the documents of the same base (candidate and origin/dev,
  latest publication wins): clean, high, stale, none; documents without
  `patches` cover by number. `tag=nightly` is a reserved mode: the
  candidate is required, the document is
  SHIP-REVIEW-<base>-dev-<sha12>.md, only none/stale tasks are read and
  nothing runs when nothing is uncovered. The beta reads the same delta
  (force=true reads everything, as before); the brief names what the
  night already read. The gate refuses none/stale with the command and
  keeps the High refusal with force=true; all clean passes without a tag
  document. The machine block gains `mode` and `patches` at its end.
  comment-high writes one line per task of a nightly document with High,
  once per document (hp:ship-review-high).
- _ship-review.yml: prepare refuses nightly without a candidate before
  defaulting to the dev tip, computes the document from base and SHA and
  no longer reads a prepare failure behind `| tee` as "no ship tasks";
  publish takes mode and patches from prepare, never from the model
  result; a new step comments High at night with HP_PROCESS_TOKEN.
- _nightly.yml: the Validate run SHA is a separate step output before
  the wait; a new job dispatches ship-review.yml -f tag=nightly on it
  whatever Validate's outcome, waits only for the run to appear and
  never colours the night. Thin files in main are unchanged.
- reviews-index/reviews-archive: the nightly name is a ship document
  with nightly: true; a beta base archives with its line, a stable base
  with the nearest archived line newer than the base, or stays.
- PROCESS.md §11.7, §10.4 and REVIEWER.md describe the nightly mode,
  patch set, coverage and beta delta; the digest test pins the key rule.

Tests run the prepare, publish and comment steps and the nightly steps
on real bash with real git in temporary repositories; only push
transport and gh are faked.

Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] af339fda3b docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#725)
Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
claude[bot] 011e351249 docs: review document for #725
Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 235f60e693 perf(card): a floor switch stops forcing layout and re-walking the config (#725)
Profiling #694 found three costs on every View pass, paid even with the
summary panel hidden.

The summary panel read the safe-area probe's computed style in layout(),
which the card reaches up to five times per render (renderControls,
menuItems, renderPanel twice, the clock check), and its updated()
measured the stage, probe and kiosk buttons after every DOM commit. The
insets now live in the measured state: measureLayout is the only method
that reads style or layout, and updated() calls it only when an input of
the measurement changed (probe, kiosk buttons or stage element, title,
language, mode, kiosk, kiosk scale, narrow, HA theme), after connect()
or an identity change, on visibility, once after document.fonts.ready,
and from resized() as before. A floor switch or an HA tick no longer
measures.

The _model getter rebuilt the config fingerprint (a walk over every
space and room with JSON.stringify of room settings) on each of its
dozens of reads per render. ConfigFingerprintPass remembers the whole
cache key (epoch and fingerprint) from the start of willUpdate() to the
end of render() while the epoch, the config object and its spaces array
are unchanged. Remembering only the fingerprint and concatenating the key
on every read was tried first: in 2.5D on the large house the switch cycle
measured slower than without any memo, and CPU profiles showed several
times more garbage collection on load and on the first visit of a floor;
one remembered key per pass has neither. Outside the pass (handlers, updated(),
timers) every read still builds the key, so an in-place edit without an
epoch bump stays visible (HP-1454-04). No write to the fingerprinted
fields is reachable from willUpdate() or render().

_isoScene read the stage box during render only to feed an aspect into
the overlay fit, whose frame has not depended on the aspect since #713.
It now uses the frame's own aspect and passes stageSize: null.

render-layout-read.mjs now also judges _isoScene and the whole summary
runtime except measureLayout, forbids layout property reads
(clientWidth, offsetTop, ...) besides the two calls, and reports every
violation. Two registered mutants restore the old reads.

No visible change: panel caps, side, offsets and kiosk clearance are
computed from the same values; the 2.5D frame is the same.

Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
claude[bot] 8fac66e1c3 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#726)
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
claude[bot] 530eb0090d docs: review document for #726
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] d327ec3d93 feat(process): a failed show verdict re-routes to ask without a fresh budget (#726)
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.

The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.

The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.

Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
claude[bot] 56be779ca7 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#728)
Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:03:28 +00:00