Commit Graph
1234 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot] ab5e5ed96f docs: review document for #335
Issue: #335
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 10:41:54 +00:00
claude[bot] ccf685e0f8 docs: review document for #335
Issue: #335
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 10:33:42 +00:00
Matysh 79aa0a90c4 docs: accept v1.69.0-beta.1 runtime screenshot
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 12:50:03 +03:00
Matysh 801e49092f fix: keep lazy editor release version synchronized
Issue: #337
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 12:47:30 +03:00
Matysh eef1ec844c docs: accept v1.69.0-beta.1 screenshots
Accept the complete canonical Linux capture from run 33159459520 after visual
review of View, touch and Device editor surfaces.

Issue: #345
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 12:29:42 +03:00
Matysh 58ebf8b4cd build: prepare v1.69.0-beta.1 candidate
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 18s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 40s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 51s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 15s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 22s
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 11m19s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 11m46s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Package the complete German interface, the unified Device lifecycle catalog,
wall-junction correctness and performance work, and the supporting delivery
infrastructure reviewed since v1.68.1.

Issue: #29
Issue: #62
Issue: #264
Issue: #267
Issue: #329
Issue: #330
Issue: #331
Issue: #333
Issue: #337
Issue: #348
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 12:24:15 +03:00
claude[bot] 6a0a349b2e docs: review document for #348
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 09:08:12 +00:00
Matysh 4cdd6d7aac test: prove German dialog layout at narrow widths
Extend the existing localized dialog footer measurements to German at desktop and 320 px. The smoke now checks opening, physical-wall and space dialogs for containment, responsive wrapping and horizontal overflow, closing #348 review r1-M1.

Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 11:58:47 +03:00
claude[bot]andMatysh 37cb415100 docs: review document for #348
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 11:58:47 +03:00
Matysh 5740324bed fix: keep locale gate within view budget
Track locale-owned inert and busy state together, preserving the same render contract while keeping the deterministic initial View graph below its hard gzip budget. Refresh generated assets and the documentation fingerprint after the source cleanup.

Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 11:58:46 +03:00
Matysh 12cd8a1af3 feat: add complete German localization
Add Deutsch across all card surfaces and backend flows, backed by the language registry introduced in #62. German loads as a fingerprint-checked page-shared locale chunk so EN/RU remain synchronous and the initial View budget stays intact. Root render gates prevent mixed-language flashes, retry once, and fail open to English. Extend parity, runtime, bundle, browser and visual coverage, plus contributor and user documentation.

Issue: #348
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 11:58:46 +03:00
claude[bot]andMatysh 7a0702adea docs: review document for #348
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 11:58:46 +03:00
Matysh dcbaea2c08 docs: specify German localization
Issue: #348
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 11:58:46 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin c665c7d344 docs: accept re-captured screenshots
Issue: #345
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 10:33:20 +03:00
claude[bot] 918fc9e2fe docs: review document for #333
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 06:06:23 +00:00
claude[bot]andCodex 783cc68b91 docs: review document for #333
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 08:55:39 +03:00
Codex 5a2dd333d2 fix: plan/optimize passes the junction gate; import stays free by design (#333)
The owner's decision (2026-08-28): optimize is one of the two commands a
client can use to write arbitrary geometry, so it validates its candidate
against the stored document exactly as config/set does — inheritance counted
per rule (repairing a legacy plan with violations still passes; #329 AC10
already proves an honest optimization adds none, so the gate is a no-op for
legitimate flows), while a crafted payload is refused with the stable
junction_limit_<rule> code the except list has been ready for since #329.
The call lives inside the existing executor function, and a successful
optimize refreshes rt.junction_baseline with the candidate's counts so the
next config/set inherits from the cache (#330 §4.2 symmetry).

Import and backup restore stay OUTSIDE the gate on purpose — #329 §3
promises a restore is never blocked. The module docstring stops promising
more than the code does, and spec #329 §5 records the perimeter and the
trade-off explicitly: a crafted import can persist violations, but they are
inherited, never legalised as new ones.

HA tests pin AC1 (crafted spike refused, stored config and rev
byte-unchanged), AC2 (echo-optimize of a stored plan that already carries a
violation passes) and AC3 (the follow-up config/set takes its baseline from
the cache — observed through a recording wrapper). The
junction-limit-optimize-unguarded mutant turns AC1 red through the
backend-test-guard convention.

Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 08:55:39 +03:00
claude[bot] b37a59874c docs: review document for #337
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 9b79807b69 docs: accept lazy editor screenshot fingerprint
Reviewed artifact: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/33144737317

Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
claude[bot] c88af61be2 docs: review document for #337
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
claude[bot] 3cb9e2ba62 docs: review document for #337
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 9b519b0d4c fix: preserve editor behavior across lazy runtime
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
claude[bot] 37a5d14569 docs: review document for #337
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 61d9952543 docs: refresh screenshots after dev rebase
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 542e54034b docs: accept canonical screenshots for lazy runtime
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 2c65fcec03 perf: lazy-load editor runtime
Issue: #337
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
claude[bot] 5a703ef562 docs: review document for #337
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
Matyshandclaude[bot] 4485417027 docs: specify lazy editor bundle
Issue: #337
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:40:28 +00:00
claude[bot] 7340622524 docs: review document for #333
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:32:29 +00:00
claude[bot] ff6e53a48a docs: review document for #333
Issue: #333
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 05:26:53 +00:00
Codex 508945c088 fix: a 0° pair is the shared-wall model, not a duplicate — field revert of #331 §2.2
Red dev caught it ninety minutes after the merge: smoke_plan_drawing_repairs
and smoke_resize_pointer_real_plan went red because the new "a 0° wedge is
always a duplicate" rule refused two ordinary edits — creating a room over
an existing partition ring (#308's legal overlay) and resizing a wall until
it lands on a neighbour's. The premise was wrong at the model level: a
shared wall of two adjacent rooms IS two co-located owner atoms on one line,
so every shared-wall node carries a legitimate 0° pair by construction.
Bisection pinned the exact cut: with only the 0° rule reverted, both smokes
are green again; keys, incidence, the iterative walk and fail-closed stay.

Spec revision 4 records the revert and returns "an exact duplicate wall is
invisible to П1" to the status of a KNOWN LIMITATION — an honest detector
needs owner identity, which is a separate decision for the owner to make.
The zero-wedge mutant is removed with its rule; the .5-tick parity unit now
observes quantisation through valence instead of the retired duplicate
visibility; changelogs drop the over-promise.

Issue: #331
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 05:20:45 +03:00
claude[bot] 95fba6dbab docs: review document for #331
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 53s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m16s
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 1m1s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 17s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 16s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 7m11s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 9m5s
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 02:01:06 +00:00
Codex 58f3acbbde fix: junction limits are honest at the boundaries (#331)
Six normative cuts, both mirrors symmetric (spec revision 3):

- §2.1 node keys quantise to 1e-7 with the repository's canonicalisation
  formula (sign·floor(|v|·1e7+0.5)/1e7, -0 normalised) — toFixed(6) keys
  split one node into two on floating debris and produced two false П4
  refusals on a legitimate resize (reproduced: -1e-8 vs 0). Node pairs
  within 2e-7 of each other (raw coordinates) are ONE node, and the
  node-to-wall incidence uses the same quantum.
- §2.2 a ~0° wedge IS a violation: two rays leaving a node the same way are
  a duplicated or overlaid wall (a butt joint yields 180°, never 0°) — the
  worst degenerate case was invisible while 0.5° was refused.
- §2.3/§2.4 the wall run is an iterative edge walk over the collinear
  component: no recursion (10 000 atoms answered, not RangeError), no
  silently dropped fork (the old .find lost every branch but the first),
  O(E) by construction, and collinearity is measured against the BASE
  segment's axis so an arc of 0.9°-per-atom pieces cannot pose as one wall.
- §2.5 an exception while judging the CANDIDATE refuses the write with the
  junction.limit_check_failed toast (fail-closed, as the #278 guard); the
  baseline branch stays fail-open by design and the smoke proves the
  asymmetry by breaking only the second call of the deterministic pair.
- §2.6 the python mirror narrows its except on the candidate side only:
  a genuine migration bug (TypeError) surfaces as an honest WS error, while
  a previous-side bug keeps the wide "no baseline" fallback — the two AC6
  cases pin the asymmetry so swapped sides turn a unit red.

Parity fixtures gain the new boundary classes (debris node, duplicate wall,
collinear fork); four new mutants pin the filter, the key precision, the
dropped branch and the fail-open hole.

Issue: #331
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 04:39:46 +03:00
claude[bot] c231602a2b docs: review document for #331
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 01:33:02 +00:00
Codex 4423d28579 docs: spec #331 revision 3 — AC6 tells the two sides apart
r2 M-r2-1: AC6 now mirrors AC5's structure with two explicit cases — a
candidate-side TypeError is an honest WS error, a previous-side TypeError
falls back to "no baseline" and the unrelated write passes. An
implementation with swapped or missing asymmetry turns at least one of the
two units red. L2: the risk wording follows §2.3's component-sum phrasing.

Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 04:30:13 +03:00
claude[bot] ebbfe4588f docs: review document for #331
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 01:27:57 +00:00
Codex 2d70354345 docs: spec #331 revision 2 — canonical rounding, honest incidence threshold, edge-walk instead of DFS
r1-H1: node keys quantise with the repository's canonicalisation formula
(sign·floor(|v|·1e7+0.5)/1e7) — native Math.round and Python round() part
ways on .5 ticks, the exact parity lesson coordinate-canonicalization
already encodes. r1-M1: the incidence threshold becomes 2e-7 over raw
coordinates, which the spec's own example (1.02e-7) actually satisfies; the
known valence undercount on neighbouring quanta is stated in §3. r1-M2: the
narrow except applies to the candidate side only — a previous-side migration
bug stays a "no baseline" fallback, symmetric with §2.5. r1-M3: the branch
walk is an O(E) edge traversal of the collinear component, not a
combinatorial DFS; AC3 gains a 100-fork case. r1-M4: the USER-GUIDE limits
section documents the new refusal toast. L1: §1 opens with the user
sentence.

Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 04:20:17 +03:00
claude[bot] 3de2a4a4b5 docs: review document for #331
Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 01:16:18 +00:00
Codex 60e125e960 docs: spec #331 — boundary precision of the junction limits
Quantised node keys with -0 normalisation and node incidence at the quantum,
zero-degree wedges become visible, an iterative maximal-branch wall run, arc
collinearity measured against the chain base, fail-closed candidate checks,
and a narrow except in the python mirror. Every reproduction in §1 was
verified by execution on current dev after #330.

Issue: #331
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 04:03:14 +03:00
claude[bot] 2d1ca74a7d docs: review document for #330
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 1m30s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m50s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m50s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 18s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 28s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 5m56s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 6m29s
Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 00:56:30 +00:00
Codex d33aa0a7e5 docs: refresh the screenshot pair after the cache-key fix (#330 r3-H1)
Third time this class bites in one task: any src/** edit staleness the
screenshot source fingerprint mechanically, and I keep forgetting the
capture step after code-only commits. The pair (PNGs + manifest) is
regenerated from one run; check-docs is green on this SHA.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:53:04 +03:00
claude[bot] 90a3313d92 docs: review document for #330
Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 00:49:56 +00:00
claude[bot] 294d7047f3 docs: review document for #330
Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 00:30:31 +00:00
Codex 85636a65bb docs: re-capture the screenshot set after the second rebase (#330)
Same pairing rule as before: PNG files and their manifest must come from one
capture run; the rebase over the i18n-registry merge (#62) mixed the sides
again.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:08:32 +03:00
Codex ddfca3a865 fix: close code-review 330-r1 — budgets from the slowest machine, the bench in Validate, AC1 through the execution thread (#330)
H2: the benchmark budgets were calibrated on the author's sandbox with a
1.14x margin — the review runner measured tsFullCandidateMs at 169-171 ms
against a 100 ms ceiling. Budgets now keep the spec's 2-3x allowance over
the SLOWEST observed machine, and the benchmark runs as a step of the
Validate perf job on every push (it needs no browser and no bundle), not
only inside the weekly mutation gate.

M1: the promised AC1 backend test exists now and does what AC1 means: it
patches validate_junction_limits with a thread-recording wrapper inside the
real HA harness — on the event loop that would be MainThread — and proves
the verdicts survived the move (a clean write is accepted, a write adding a
spike is refused with junction_limit_angle). Spec revision 4 rewrites AC1
around this invariant instead of a fragile millisecond assertion.

M2: §4.6 equivalence is now behavioural on both sides (three boundary
fixtures each: as-is counts equal through-migration counts, TS and python),
and the parity suite gained the §7 boundary fixtures (exact 15°, exact
20 cm, the thickness-step filler run, exact 5 cm).

H1 was already closed by 7513f93d (the review ran on the previous HEAD):
check-docs is green on this tree — the screenshots and their manifest come
from one capture run.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:07:44 +03:00
Codex 4e8e00fa73 docs: regenerate the screenshot set consistently after the rebase (#330)
The rebase resolved docs/images/screenshots.json to the dev side while the
PNG files stayed from this branch's capture — CI correctly refused the
mismatched pair. One local capture regenerates both halves from the same
run, so hashes and the source fingerprint agree again.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:07:44 +03:00
Codex 658c955553 docs: spec #330 revision 3 — §4.7, the П5 shared pass the benchmark uncovered
Writing the §5 benchmark honestly exposed a cost the point measurements of
П1-П4 could not see: П5 recomputed the full junction topology and masonry
union PER ROOM — 4.2 s per candidate on the benchmark grid. Revision 3 adds
the shared-pass cut (one topology pass per check, the union only when
multi-wall nodes exist, and the resize path reusing its own preflight
artifact) with the measured numbers. Budgets in §5 already assumed the fix;
they are now achievable and proven by the passing benchmark.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:07:37 +03:00
Codex 5fb4ce328b docs: refresh screenshot source fingerprint (#330)
Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:07:37 +03:00
Codex c90f5bf052 perf: junction limits scale — executor, rev cache, linear П3/П4, shared masonry pass (#330)
Six cuts, zero verdict changes (spec §3; equivalence pinned by units, the
parity suite and the smokes):

- §4.1 the CPU chain of ws_config_set and ws_plan_optimize runs in the
  executor; write_lock still serialises writes, only the HA event loop is
  freed (2.8 s of blocking per 576-atom write before).
- §4.2 the stored document's violation counts are cached on the runtime by
  rev (store.py junction_baseline); a repeated write never re-judges
  `previous`. validate_junction_limits takes baseline_counts and returns the
  candidate's counts to cache after a successful save.
- §4.3 П3 builds its node index once per check in both mirrors
  (289→11 ms TS, 285→~50 ms py).
- §4.5 П4 uses a bucket grid with the threshold as cell size in both
  mirrors (104→19 ms TS, 372→44 ms py); pair enumeration switches to
  lexicographic order — same verdict set, equivalence pinned against a
  brute-force oracle on cell borders.
- §4.6 a document already carrying the current catalogue is judged as-is:
  a no-op re-migration cost 815 ms py / 69 ms TS. Legacy documents migrate
  exactly as before (the #329 H1 test stays green).
- §4.7 П5 shares one junction-topology pass per check and pays the masonry
  union only when multi-wall nodes exist — and the resize path hands over
  the preflight's own artifact, so a pointermove never builds the union
  twice (4.2 s → 88 ms full candidate on the benchmark grid).

The frontend baseline is cached per (document identity, config epoch): ten
pointermoves make N+1 limit computations, not 2N — pinned by the smoke on a
real pointer gesture.

demo/benchmark_junction_limits.mjs (npm run benchmark:junction-limits) pins
the budgets for both mirrors: TS full candidate ≤100 ms (measured 88), py
warm validate ≤250 ms (measured 45), cold legacy ≤3.5 s — that path is
one-off and lives in the executor.

Issue: #330
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-28 03:07:11 +03:00
claude[bot]andCodex 92f476556f docs: review document for #330
Issue: #330
User-Visible: no
2026-08-28 03:06:44 +03:00