Commit Graph
2153 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Codex 398281a93f fix: the summary panel's first paint no longer freezes or claims the sources are gone
Two halves of the same first paint. The panel showed «Source unavailable»
in every row until the lazy metrics chunk arrived, because value() could
not tell "not loaded yet" from "source is dead"; and metrics() ran inside
render, walking the HA registry and unioning the clean floor of every
space synchronously — 11 s on the large-house fixture.

- totalCleanFloorAreaM2 computes the space's masonry and junction
  topology once per SPACE and hands them to innerContourForRoom, which
  otherwise unions the whole space again for every room: 11 045 → 1 488 ms
  on that fixture, same 306.3 m². The card has always done this through
  its own _innerContour cache; the panel now does the same.
- Aggregates leave the render path: the first frame paints skeletons and
  the work starts right after the frame is shown (timeout → rAF →
  timeout, never requestIdleCallback, which under load would leave the
  skeleton up for seconds). Stale memo keeps the previous number on
  screen instead of flashing back to a skeleton.
- valueState() separates pending from unavailable; a pending row keeps
  the same plate, grid and height and carries a pulsing rectangle the
  height of the line, replaced by the value with a short fade. Reduced
  motion keeps the rectangle and drops the pulse.
- Panel enter/exit animation (#505, 190 ms) is now actually visible —
  the main thread is free — and the smoke witnesses it.

Mutants: summary-first-paint-shows-unavailable, summary-metrics-block-first-frame,
summary-area-recomputes-walls-per-room, summary-stale-metric-falls-back-to-skeleton.

Issue: #509
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-10 11:24:10 +03:00
claude[bot] 9d375dcb40 docs: review document for #509
Issue: #509
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 08:14:22 +00:00
claude[bot] 57f38fedba docs: review document for #509
Issue: #509
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 08:05:30 +00:00
claude[bot] d204bf5d77 docs: review document for #517
Issue: #517
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 07:36:17 +00:00
Codex 156835c048 ci: specs live in the issue body — body digest in review anchors, gate without a spec file
The spec file solved exactly one problem — proving that a review verdict
was passed on a given text — and created two: docs/specs/README.md
conflicted between parallel tasks and served as a second, stale status
dictionary, and every spec edit cost a commit, a push and a label. The
proof moves into the pipeline.

- review-doc-guard: normalizeIssueBody / issueBodyDigest (CRLF, trailing
  whitespace, trailing newlines), the anchor line `Тело issue: <sha256>`,
  anchorIssueBodyFrom, and issueBodyChanged — the finding "the spec
  changed after a green spec review", judged against the pipeline's own
  record in the last green SPEC-REVIEW, never against prose.
- reusableGreenVerdict takes the current digest: reuse (#499) skips the
  model entirely, so without this a spec edit between rounds would pass
  unseen. Documents without the record (the whole backlog) keep judging
  by tree.
- process.yml: the material step reads the body with `gh issue view` in
  the same run that fixes the material — the event snapshot describes a
  text the reviewer may never see; the digest goes into the anchors, into
  reuse and, when it differs, into the reviewer's prompt.
- process-gate: rule 3 judges the text (a `## ТЗ` heading or an AC1) with
  the archived file still accepted; adding a new file under docs/specs/
  warns — the directory is frozen.
- task-packet reads AC from the body first, the archived file second.
- PROCESS.md §2.3/§5/§7.1/§7.3/§10.5, AGENTS.md and docs/specs/README.md
  say so; the index table is gone with the long-standing §7.3 debt.

Mutants: review-anchor-drops-issue-body, review-ignores-changed-spec-body,
reuse-ignores-changed-issue-body, process-gate-requires-spec-file.

Issue: #517
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 10:18:17 +03:00
claude[bot] e20560afa8 docs: review document for #517
Issue: #517
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 07:08:05 +00:00
claude[bot] 6b31e94501 docs: review document for #517
Issue: #517
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 06:54:51 +00:00
claude[bot] a824acc1b1 docs: review document for #502
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 58s
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 40s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m11s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Skipped
Issue: #502
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 06:34:45 +00:00
claude[bot] 9293109ba1 docs: review document for #516
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 35s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 53s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 22s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 22s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m1s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 11m54s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 4m28s
Issue: #516
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:39:17 +00:00
claude[bot] 96bfd94313 docs: review document for #516
Issue: #516
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:39:17 +00:00
claude[bot] 440460255b docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:37:26 +00:00
claude[bot] ed6d1d76db docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] a8a9b7d99e docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] 39571e20d6 docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 0796a01571 ci: the E2E gate recognises its run by the suites that install the tag
Two findings from the live run on v1.73.0 (houseplan-e2e run
34393136097): the upgrade job carries the previous stable's tag in its
name, so "any job with HP <tag>" let a gate for v1.72.0 adopt the
v1.73.0 run — recognition now keys on `journeys`/`first-run`; and the
first poll after a dispatch sees only the matrix-planning job, which
marked the run as foreign forever — a run without any `· HP … ·` job is
undecided and polled again. Live: v1.73.0 → green with the run link,
v1.72.0 → no run of its own.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 57b19f9914 ci: the E2E gate upgrades from the previous stable, not from the tag under test
Live run on v1.73.0 (houseplan-e2e run 34392391382): at `release:
published` the new tag is already the newest stable, so
`upgrade_from=stable` made the upgrade suite update v1.73.0 onto itself
and fail with `Expected: not "1.73.0"`. The gate now resolves the newest
non-prerelease, non-draft release other than the tag from `gh release
list` and passes it as `upgrade_from`; the first stable ever falls back
to `stable`. Spec §4/§6 record the change and the matrix-planning job in
houseplan-e2e (a job-level `if` cannot read `matrix.*`).

Mutant: release-upgrades-stable-onto-itself.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] c50458a098 ci: a stable release waits for a green E2E run on a real Home Assistant
The stable gate proved Validate and Full Performance on the exact SHA but
never ran the release in Home Assistant itself. houseplan-e2e installs
the release's houseplan.zip — the bytes HACS ships — into HA in docker
and walks the sidebar page, dashboards, roles, PDF, restart and the
stable→tag upgrade. release.yml now dispatches e2e.yml on the tag for
`!prerelease` releases and waits for it (scripts/e2e-gate.mjs, modelled
on validate-gate.mjs): the gate recognises its own run by `HP <tag>` in
the job names, ignores foreign dispatches, and reports red / missing /
cancelled / token error with the run link. Betas are untouched.

Mutants: release-ships-on-red-e2e, release-trusts-foreign-e2e-run.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] d20ef60037 docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 8f037a74dc docs: spec for #514 — E2E on a real Home Assistant as the stable release gate
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] ad2858a80c docs: review document for #515
Issue: #515
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:13:52 +00:00
claude[bot] 3c1b4ebee2 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:55:09 +00:00
claude[bot] be93291065 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:02:08 +00:00
claude[bot] 6ac513caa0 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:49:18 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] e38beed796 fix: the summary panel settings dialog scrolls in Home Assistant
In HA hp-dialog renders ha-dialog, whose own `.body` is the scroller and
is not a flex container; `.summary-editor` (overflow:auto,
overscroll-behavior:contain, min-height:0) therefore grew to its content
and became a scroll container that never scrolls — Chromium stops wheel
and touch scroll chaining at such a child, so nothing moved (reproduced
on ha.jbstudio.pro, HA 2026.9.1, and in an isolated Playwright page).
hp-dialog gains an opt-in `flex-content` attribute forwarded as
ha-dialog's `flexcontent`, which lays the body out as a flex column: the
editor is height-bound again and scrolls itself, header and footer stay,
exactly as the native branch already did. Only the summary dialog opts in.

Smoke demo/smoke_summary_dialog_scroll.mjs stubs ha-dialog after the HA
2026.9 contract: wheel on desktop, touch swipe on a phone, dialog within
the viewport, and a witness that the stub reproduces the bug without
flexcontent. Docs screenshots: 11/11 pixel-identical (docs:accept
--identical, #512), fingerprint refreshed.

Mutants: summary-dialog-drops-flex-content, hp-dialog-ignores-flex-content.

Issue: #508
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-09 19:49:18 +00:00
claude[bot] 6b592c13c0 docs: review document for #502
Issue: #502
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:35:30 +00:00
claude[bot] 72764cff90 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:21:54 +00:00
claude[bot] f02af9330b docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:01:45 +00:00
claude[bot] fa01aa00bf docs: review document for #513
Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:09:24 +00:00
Codex 0b9acd6382 docs: the local pre-push gate no longer calls the full mutation registry a pre-release gate
Code review r1 (M1): scripts/pre-push-gate.mjs — in its comment and in
the text every developer sees before a push — still named the full
mutation registry a pre-release gate; the same phrase lived in the
header of test/mutation-gate.test.mjs. Both now point at the nightly
schedule (#513); golden/smokes/HA harness are named as the heavy
Validate set on the candidate.

Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:00:54 +03:00
claude[bot] f5fb7a0f8a docs: review document for #513
Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 17:58:17 +00:00
Codex 61905bacdc ci: full mutation gate runs nightly, outside the development and release cycle
The full registry run proves that tests can fail, not that the product
works; 4 of its 5 runs since 02.09 were manual dispatches tied to
releases. Owner decision 09.09: a daily schedule (01:00 UTC, before the
02:30 nightly Validate), failures reported as an issue by the existing
#472 job, no place in the development or release flow. Docs and the
workflow comments say so; the test pins the daily cron.

Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:49:08 +03:00
claude[bot] 9b65d4bcf7 docs: review document for #512
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 36s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m0s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 41s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 19s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m10s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 12m6s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 5m0s
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 16:15:24 +00:00
Codex b7d8b9e6ee test: displayed version through a seam; docs:accept --identical for pixel-identical screenshots
Golden frames carried the card version text (about, version banner,
support/export previews), so every beta bump re-accepted up to 20
baselines that had not visually changed. The version now reaches the DOM
and stand requests through displayVersion() (src/card-version.ts); the
golden harness pins window.__HP_VERSION_OVERRIDE__ = '0.0.0-golden'
before the card is created. CARD_VERSION literals stay where the release
contract reads them; cache-busting and the console banner keep the literal.

Docs screenshots: `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` re-captures
locally, compares decoded RGBA pixels with the committed frames inside
Chromium (scripts/png-identical.mjs) and, only when every frame is
identical, refreshes the manifest fingerprints and captureScriptSha256;
bytes stay, any difference refuses with a per-frame count. First run on
this tree: 11/11 identical, manifest refreshed.

Mutants: version-seam-ignores-override, docs-identical-accepts-any-frame.

Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:53:38 +03:00
claude[bot]andCodex e5a62f7ffd docs: review document for #512
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
Codex 7674b78c33 docs: spec #512 r2 — capture.mjs untouched, --identical refreshes the capture-script guard
Spec review r1 (H1): the `--out` flag would have changed the only file
guarded by `captureScriptSha256` and reddened check-docs on its own. The
identical-accept mode now leaves demo/docs/capture.mjs as is (frames are
backed up and restored around the standard capture) and takes
`captureScriptSha256` from the candidate manifest together with the
source fingerprint; the docs re-acceptance for this issue is the first
local --identical run in the same branch.

Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
claude[bot]andCodex 3f402a3481 docs: review document for #512
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
Codex 278d9257eb docs: spec for #512 — version seam outside golden frames, docs:accept --identical
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
claude[bot] 33cb131b3a docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:52:11 +00:00
claude[bot] 8acbd333d8 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:43:09 +00:00
Codex 00130e08aa ci: a cancelled Validate dispatch proves nothing to the review gate
Code review r1 (M1): validate-gate.mjs and merge-candidate's waitValidate
read a `cancelled` dispatch run on the material as red, so a dispatch
replaced by the next one in the `validate-dispatch-<ref>` concurrency
group would have returned the task S7→S6 for nothing — the same class
#511 fixed in release-gate.mjs. Cancelled runs are now ignored: the gate
follows the replacement dispatch, or starts its own when there is none.

Mutant: review-returns-task-on-cancelled-dispatch.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:33:24 +03:00
claude[bot] f6e64ba985 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:29:18 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 97dfa457a4 ci: diff mutants only on request; the review pipeline proves them on the material before reviewing
Validate ran the three "Мутанты по диффу" shards on every push of every
branch: 48 of 56 job-hours on 08–09.09, most of them cancelled by the
next push. Mutants now run when asked — pull requests, the nightly
schedule, a push carrying a `Release:` trailer, or a dispatch with
`mutants=true` (classify-changes.mjs → `mutants_requested`); an ordinary
push runs the light checks only.

The proof moves to where it is consumed. process.yml gets a gate after
the #499 reuse step: on the code stage it looks for a dispatch Validate
run on the exact material SHA whose mutant jobs executed and passed
(scripts/validate-gate.mjs); none → it dispatches one and waits; red or
missing → the task goes back S7→S6 with the run link and the review
cycle is not spent. Spec stage and the reuse fast-path skip the gate
(`proceed=true`); all later steps branch on `proceed` in place of the
old conflict conjunct only. merge-candidate.mjs dispatches Validate on
the pushed candidate and waits for that dispatch run.

PROCESS.md/AGENTS.md: review does not start on red code; one handoff —
one push.

Mutants: mutants-run-on-every-push, review-starts-on-red-validate,
review-trusts-push-run-without-mutants, merge-waits-push-run-without-mutants.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 34c5c2d134 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 73d6e2eeeb docs: spec #510 r4 — proceed replaces only the conflict conjunct
Spec review r3: `proceed` is true on the reuse fast-path too, so it must
replace the `rebase.conflict != 'true'` conjunct alone; the existing
`reuse != 'true'` (#499), stage and decide conjuncts stay on every step
that has them. The "single variable" claim is narrowed accordingly.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 24cd39fca5 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 65526a6a7f docs: spec #510 r3 — one branching variable for the gate outcome
Spec review r2: §5.2 named the gate outcome three different ways; the
skip branch (spec stage, reuse fast-path) would have matched a literal
`result != 'green'` and produced a spurious S7→S6 return. All step
conditions now branch on `proceed` only (true = green or skipped, false =
red/missing); `result` feeds the comment text alone.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] b593489041 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] a91ba16a5c docs: spec #510 r2 — gate after reuse, proof requires executed mutant jobs
Spec review r1: place the gate after the #499 reuse step so its output is
defined; a green dispatch counts only when the "Мутанты по диффу" jobs ran
and passed (a foreign dispatch with mutants=false leaves them skipped);
therefore the Validate job runs whenever mutants are requested, even on an
empty selection. Explicit User-Visible/UX/i18n N/A statement added.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 1063156f12 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 2b8b7b2aa7 docs: spec for #510 — mutants on the review candidate, review waits for a green Validate, handoff rules
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00