Matysh 41325a852f fix: spend the review budget on blocking verdicts only ...

The pipeline punished what it prescribed: after a failed merge it tells the
author to rebase and restore S7-code-review, and that attempt finished the
budget. On #225 (light track, limit 2) the sequence yellow, green, rebase
produced review-4 on a task whose code review was green and whose CI was
green, with no product change after the verdict — the owner had to
arbitrate work that was already accepted.

A cycle under section 4 is a verdict with blocking findings followed by a
return to the author, so only yellow and red verdicts spend the budget now.
A green verdict returned nothing and consumes nothing, which also removes
any need to mark rebase re-runs specially.

Attempts and cycles are now separate quantities. The attempt number keeps
naming the document, because two runs sharing a number would overwrite each
other's review artefact, while the limit compares blocking cycles only. The
exhaustion comment lists the verdicts it counted, and the guard no longer
strips review-4 — it reports the recount and leaves the decision with the
owner.

Rule 7 of the process gate follows: its document threshold rises above the
cycle limit, because legitimate attempts can exceed cycles and a threshold
equal to the limit would refuse the very rebase the pipeline demands.

Issue: #227
User-Visible: no

2026-08-20 23:17:16 +03:00

..

ISSUE_TEMPLATE

docs v1.44.1: add the Telegram community chat (@ha_houseplan)

2026-07-27 12:51:48 +03:00

workflows

fix: spend the review budget on blocking verdicts only

2026-08-20 23:17:16 +03:00