Matysh 2b45086794 docs: scope a repeat review round to the delta ...

The reviewer prompt was identical for every round, and the canon said
nothing about the scope of a repeat pass, so r2 re-derived the product
framing and re-checked acceptance criteria the fix never touched: the r2
pass on #150 cost a full pipeline run over one line in a test fixture.

From the second cycle on, the subject is the delta against the SHA the
previous verdict was given on: each earlier finding must be shown closed
by a line of code or text, only the criteria the delta can reach are
re-verified, and whatever is carried over is listed with the round and SHA
it came from. Cheap gates still run every round.

The scope shrinks, the strictness does not. A fix can break a criterion an
earlier round accepted — that is how regression #102 happened — so the
boundary is the findings plus everything the delta can reach, and a
non-local delta (a rebase onto a moved dev, a behaviour contract change, a
new subsystem) still gets the full pass.

Issue: #214
User-Visible: no

2026-08-20 11:50:16 +03:00

..

ISSUE_TEMPLATE

docs v1.44.1: add the Telegram community chat (@ha_houseplan)

2026-07-27 12:51:48 +03:00

workflows

docs: scope a repeat review round to the delta

2026-08-20 11:50:16 +03:00