The risk table of #707 judged every non-comment line of a class A file as
code. On the history since 15.09 that raised #741 from ship to show for a
removed interface member that never reaches JS, and put false classes on
#624 (removed imports), #693/#694 (stairs-view is rendering, not geometry)
and #725 (the config fingerprint memo is not the config schema).
- Lines of module syntax and TypeScript types give no risk, like comments:
`import …`, `export … from …`, `export type …`, the head of `interface X`
or `type X =`, and the lines inside such a block (indented, plus the
closing line). The block state per side of a change block starts from the
hunk context git writes after `@@ … @@` and follows every unindented line
of the block, so a member under `@@ … @@ export interface X {` and a whole
interface added in one hunk are judged alike. Only `.ts`, and not in the
`migration` area: there the types are the config contract (#588, #649).
- `stairs*` is narrowed to the stairs model (`stairs`, `stairs-box`,
`stairs-editor-model`); `config-*` to writing and adopting the config
(`config-adoption`, `config-store`, `config-reload-authority`,
`config-write-conflict`).
- A replaced line is one piece of evidence: a removed line whose counterpart
in the same change block hits the same class is folded into it instead of
printing `path:N (удалена)` next to `path:N`.
classifyRisk stays a pure function over the diff text. On the history the
raising classes change for #741 (none), #693 (visual only), #694 (no
geometry), #725 (perf only) and #624 (no devices/perf); migration on #588,
#612, #649 and #661 stays. PROCESS.md §5 names the new exemption.
Issue: #755
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
