mirror of
https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card
synced 2026-09-29 03:09:36 +00:00
Matysh
888e90450a
The owner's report: the process works but every stage takes a long time even on simple bugs. Two causes, and neither was the one that first comes to mind. The reviewer ran everything regardless. On #89 it installed Chromium, ran all 127 smoke files and a full golden capture — right for a task rated 10/10 for complexity, absurd for a bug about a room divider. Full suites are the pre-beta gate; the review now runs typecheck, unit and build always, and smokes, golden, pytest or performance only where the diff and the AC call for them. The price of narrowing it is honesty: the reviewer must list which gates it ran, which it did not, and why, so a skipped gate is a visible decision rather than a silent one. The reviewer also built its own environment out of model turns, with no npm cache and no browser cache, paid for from the same forty-five minutes. The workflow now installs dependencies and Chromium as ordinary cached steps, after switching to the task branch so the lockfile is the branch's own. Second, ceremony did not scale down. The light track makes a spec cheap; the new trivial track does without one — S2-analysis straight to S5-ready, no spec review, AC in the issue body. It is deliberately hard to qualify for: a bug on one surface, no new UX contract, no migration, no i18n, no perf or touch effect, three checkable AC at most, and expected behaviour already on record. Nothing left to decide is the criterion that holds the whole thing up, and it cannot be met by feeling sure. Code review is never skipped on either track. It is what stands in for testing here, so it is the one stage speed may not buy. Issue: #127 Issue: #128 User-Visible: no