mirror of
https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card
synced 2026-10-02 04:38:55 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot]
de3e1f00e1
The code-review prompt sat at exactly 1 400 of its 1 400 words (#634), so any new line turned the budget test red, and #707/#726 already had to route their notes through job outputs. Part of the text was dead or a retelling of the reviewer digest, which #634 says the prompt must not repeat: - the mutants fragment of the track line: since #709 `mutants` is always false, so «прогнаны Validate» was unreachable; - «Отсутствие мутантов по диффу — не находка» in the show line: a rule of every track, already in REVIEWER.md «Трек show» and §10.4; - three retellings — the repeated round, the gate scope and the severity paragraph — now one-line references to the REVIEWER.md sections. The ban on a separate issue for an in-scope Medium stays in the prompt: the model files issues itself, and that mistake is expensive. What only the prompt said moves into REVIEWER.md with links to the canon: the spec delta is the diff of the issue body, a doubt about locality means a full review with a stated reason, the three smoke-select answers (docs/TESTING.md), and geometry without invariants in the report is an unrun gate. The prompt is now 1 130 words; the 1 400 threshold stays, the difference is headroom. A new test ties every «docs/process/REVIEWER.md, «X»» reference in the prompt to an existing `## X` section. Issue: #750 User-Visible: no Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com> Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd