Commit Graph
3961 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot] 0621d53a49 docs: review document for #740
Issue: #740
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:11:55 +00:00
claude[bot] bb25110dc4 docs: review document for #739
Issue: #739
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:08:55 +00:00
claude[bot] f3cfb93e94 docs: review document for #737
Issue: #737
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:07:59 +00:00
claude[bot] b27ae06ef8 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#730)
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:03:39 +00:00
claude[bot] 7126fd8a02 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 05:03:35 +00:00
claude[bot]andClaude 02dce77c98 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#730)
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:42 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 53bb3bf453 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 0ab685e380 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
Claude 4eb712be0e fix(process): a workflow-permission refusal tells the author to rebase (#730)
Review r1 (Medium): refusalSummary said "повтор и ребейз не помогут" for every
non-stale outcome, and since AC2 the rebase guard's summary carries it too.
For a workflow-permission refusal a rebase and push by the author is exactly
the way out (PROCESS.md §10.4). That outcome now says so; other GitHub
refusals keep the old sentence.

Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andClaude 8e42f4e972 docs: review document for #730
Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
Claude 562313944f fix(process): ship review and beta-derived pushes tell a GitHub refusal from a moved dev (#730)
After #705 and #723 two more workflow bodies still treated every failed
push as a moved dev: the SHIP-REVIEW publication (_ship-review.yml) retried
three times with "dev went ahead", and the derived-artifacts bot commit
(_beta-derived.yml) told the release manager to rerun the workflow. A
refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a branch
rule, a hook - is cured by neither, and neither step said what GitHub
answered.

Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). A stale lease keeps the old
behaviour: another attempt for the ship review, the rerun advice for the
derived artifacts. Any other outcome stops the step at once: the log gets
the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer
without secrets (--summary, refusalSummary with the new ship-review and
beta-derived labels). The classifier comes from dev, as for the other steps
of these bodies: both jobs check out dev, and the ship review resets to
origin/dev before every attempt. The ship review commit message is built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc, as in #723. The thin callers
ship-review.yml and beta-derived.yml are untouched.

The rebase guard in _process.yml also writes the refusal reason to its step
summary now (--summary, label "rebase"); a stale lease writes none.

test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories (moved dev = a real neighbour
push, GitHub refusal = recorded stderr with a token, a credential URL and
an Authorization header); on the old bodies 10 of its 12 new tests fail.
The #705 execution tests of the rebase guard in rebase-generated.test.mjs
now also read the step summary. PROCESS.md names the two steps next to the

Issue: #730
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 07:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot] 3b9f25ea65 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#727)
Проверка (CI) / Предполёт: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Бандл головы dev для стенда (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Геометрия: TS/Python parity исполнена (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Canceled after 0s
Проверка (CI) / Доказательство выполненных проверок (push) Canceled after 0s
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] cf8b8f0307 docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] d5bca5dee5 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#727)
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] 61d98158ce docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] e58d7d06f8 feat(process): nightly ship batch review, reused by the beta gate by patch set (#727)
Ship tasks merge without a model review and their code was first read by
the batch review right before a beta: one session over the whole range,
ten to forty-five minutes on the release path, days after the merge. The
gate also knew a single document (SHIP-REVIEW-<tag>.md) and covered tasks
by number only, so a commit that landed after the review under the same
trailer still counted as read.

- scripts/ship-review.mjs: the patch set of a task is the sorted
  `git patch-id --stable` of its range commits, without `Release:`
  commits (the beta candidate carries every Issue: of the line) and
  commits touching only docs/reviews/**; the diff options are explicit
  so a local git config cannot change it. shipCoverage rates every ship
  task from the documents of the same base (candidate and origin/dev,
  latest publication wins): clean, high, stale, none; documents without
  `patches` cover by number. `tag=nightly` is a reserved mode: the
  candidate is required, the document is
  SHIP-REVIEW-<base>-dev-<sha12>.md, only none/stale tasks are read and
  nothing runs when nothing is uncovered. The beta reads the same delta
  (force=true reads everything, as before); the brief names what the
  night already read. The gate refuses none/stale with the command and
  keeps the High refusal with force=true; all clean passes without a tag
  document. The machine block gains `mode` and `patches` at its end.
  comment-high writes one line per task of a nightly document with High,
  once per document (hp:ship-review-high).
- _ship-review.yml: prepare refuses nightly without a candidate before
  defaulting to the dev tip, computes the document from base and SHA and
  no longer reads a prepare failure behind `| tee` as "no ship tasks";
  publish takes mode and patches from prepare, never from the model
  result; a new step comments High at night with HP_PROCESS_TOKEN.
- _nightly.yml: the Validate run SHA is a separate step output before
  the wait; a new job dispatches ship-review.yml -f tag=nightly on it
  whatever Validate's outcome, waits only for the run to appear and
  never colours the night. Thin files in main are unchanged.
- reviews-index/reviews-archive: the nightly name is a ship document
  with nightly: true; a beta base archives with its line, a stable base
  with the nearest archived line newer than the base, or stays.
- PROCESS.md §11.7, §10.4 and REVIEWER.md describe the nightly mode,
  patch set, coverage and beta delta; the digest test pins the key rule.

Tests run the prepare, publish and comment steps and the nightly steps
on real bash with real git in temporary repositories; only push
transport and gh are faked.

Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:25:24 +00:00
claude[bot] af339fda3b docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#725)
Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
claude[bot] 011e351249 docs: review document for #725
Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 235f60e693 perf(card): a floor switch stops forcing layout and re-walking the config (#725)
Profiling #694 found three costs on every View pass, paid even with the
summary panel hidden.

The summary panel read the safe-area probe's computed style in layout(),
which the card reaches up to five times per render (renderControls,
menuItems, renderPanel twice, the clock check), and its updated()
measured the stage, probe and kiosk buttons after every DOM commit. The
insets now live in the measured state: measureLayout is the only method
that reads style or layout, and updated() calls it only when an input of
the measurement changed (probe, kiosk buttons or stage element, title,
language, mode, kiosk, kiosk scale, narrow, HA theme), after connect()
or an identity change, on visibility, once after document.fonts.ready,
and from resized() as before. A floor switch or an HA tick no longer
measures.

The _model getter rebuilt the config fingerprint (a walk over every
space and room with JSON.stringify of room settings) on each of its
dozens of reads per render. ConfigFingerprintPass remembers the whole
cache key (epoch and fingerprint) from the start of willUpdate() to the
end of render() while the epoch, the config object and its spaces array
are unchanged. Remembering only the fingerprint and concatenating the key
on every read was tried first: in 2.5D on the large house the switch cycle
measured slower than without any memo, and CPU profiles showed several
times more garbage collection on load and on the first visit of a floor;
one remembered key per pass has neither. Outside the pass (handlers, updated(),
timers) every read still builds the key, so an in-place edit without an
epoch bump stays visible (HP-1454-04). No write to the fingerprinted
fields is reachable from willUpdate() or render().

_isoScene read the stage box during render only to feed an aspect into
the overlay fit, whose frame has not depended on the aspect since #713.
It now uses the frame's own aspect and passes stageSize: null.

render-layout-read.mjs now also judges _isoScene and the whole summary
runtime except measureLayout, forbids layout property reads
(clientWidth, offsetTop, ...) besides the two calls, and reports every
violation. Two registered mutants restore the old reads.

No visible change: panel caps, side, offsets and kiosk clearance are
computed from the same values; the 2.5D frame is the same.

Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:17:40 +00:00
claude[bot] 8fac66e1c3 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#726)
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
claude[bot] 530eb0090d docs: review document for #726
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] d327ec3d93 feat(process): a failed show verdict re-routes to ask without a fresh budget (#726)
A non-green show verdict that found "something to decide" went down the same
path as "fix the code": S6 with a limit of 2. Promoting the task to track:ask
was left to the agent's memory, with no named criterion and no trace, and the
exhausted budget only surfaced on the next S7 - after a fix nobody would read.

The structured verdict now carries `route` (fix | reclassify) and an optional
`criterion` (one of the six show criteria of PROCESS.md section 5). The trust
boundary reads a missing route as fix, rejects one outside the dictionary and
rejects reclassify on a green verdict. `reviewRoute` in process-track.mjs is
the single decision: on a code review of an unconfirmed show it moves the task
to track:ask and S3-spec; on an owner-confirmed show it adds `blocked` and asks
the owner; anywhere else reclassify degrades to fix with a note. The verdict
that spends the last cycle sets review-4 at once; the stage budget is shared
across tracks, so promotion changes the limit (4), not the count.

The "Решение по вердикту" step makes one `process-track.mjs route` call (from
dev, like the track step) and only executes its output: comment from a file,
labels from add/remove lists, status via status-label.mjs as before. The track
step also emits `confirmed` and a `route_note` for the review prompt; the
review document anchor gains a route tail that the old reader still parses;
wait-verdict reports the two new pipeline comments. The guard's own
spent >= limit check stays as the safety net.

Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:06:49 +00:00
claude[bot] 56be779ca7 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#728)
Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:03:28 +00:00
claude[bot] 5e430d9ede docs: review document for #728
Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 03:03:28 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 0cc7c60e8b feat(process): process metrics by track — segments, returns, ship findings, job minutes (#728)
The weekly report could not say whether the tracks of #695/#696 paid off:
it read only the first S4/S5/S7/S8 placements of closed issues, no track,
no waiting, no reason for a return, and the CLI never passed jobs, so the
"Job-минуты" line never printed. The owner decides on these numbers, so the
definitions are spelled out in the report headers and anything unknown is
printed as such.

scripts/process-metrics.mjs (pure functions over the snapshot):
- K1 trackAt/trackPath: track at a moment from the labels set before it,
  resolved by process-track.mjs (labelTrack) — one rule with the pipeline;
  infra = no class A file in the issue's commits (Release: commits aside).
  The issue's track is the one at its first S8-merged.
- K2 issueSegments: queue/spec/work/review/rework/blocked from the first
  status label to the first S8, summing to lead; blocked is taken out of
  the segment under it; S7 over S7 is neither a return nor a new segment.
- K3 returnSignal/returnReason: S7 -> S6/S3 and S4 -> S3 returns, reason
  from the last comment with a sign between the review placement and the
  return. merge and the "not run" family come from PIPELINE_EVENTS, the
  verdicts from verdictDeclaration with the issue's own document; the two
  continuations have no pipeline constant, so NOT_RUN_VALIDATE_RE and
  NOT_RUN_CONFLICT_RE are exported copies held by a contract test on the
  _process.yml templates. Anything else is unknown; hp:route (#726)
  gives reclassify/owner-question when present.
- K4 shipFindings: High/Medium/Low of SHIP-REVIEW-*.md (docs/reviews and
  legacy/reviews) by the anchor block, summed per issue; the track table
  counts each document once.
- K5 stageMinutes: jobs of process and Validate runs (skipped runs aside,
  at most 600, "усечено: N из M" beyond), stages by job name, per track at
  run time, Validate per event; unavailable jobs are "нет данных", not 0.
  jobMinutes gets the same data and prints again.
- K6 tokenUsage: "Токены: нет данных (…)" until the pipeline records usage
  (issue F); the hp:usage line format is provisional.
- K7 compareCohorts: issues with the first S8 within 28 days before and
  after 2026-09-28 (--compare, --compare-days), cohort = track x volume
  bucket (<=30/31-200/201-1000/>1000 lines of Issue-trailer commits without
  Release:, class D and docs/reviews/**); n < 3 on a side is "мало данных".
- fetchSnapshot: issues state=all since the earliest window (the old
  selection is still "closed in the window"), timelines up to 10 pages
  (beyond: "таймлайн усечён"), jobs, ship and usage review docs, git log
  --numstat of origin/dev.

_process-metrics.yml: full history (fetch-depth: 0) for K1/K7 and a 30
minute ceiling. The thin process-metrics.yml is unchanged. PROCESS.md §5
points at the report. Old sections and their tests are unchanged.

Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 03:03:28 +00:00
Claude b3dd9444b5 test(daycycle): judge pinch frames, not the first frames of the recording (#734)
presentedFramesHaveNoWhiteTile in smoke_daycycle_layer_budget turned red now
and then on frames that are not pinch frames: the first one or two frames of
the screencast sometimes show the room before its fill (white paper, 0.997
near-white), before any pinch move, and the next frames are light grey. The
check judged every recorded frame, so a stale opening frame failed a gesture
that painted correctly.

The check now judges pinch frames only. Not judged: a frame whose swap
time (screencast metadata) is earlier than the first pinch move, and a frame
before the first one that shows the room filled. The guard keeps its power:
a white tile during the pinch comes after a filled frame and stays red; a
room white from the recording start through the whole gesture leaves no
judged frame inside the gesture, which fails both the frame count and the
white-tile check (an empty set no longer passes `every`). The frame count
counts judged frames inside the gesture, not every recorded frame.

Why the fill appears later is out of scope.

Issue: #734
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 05:33:49 +03:00
claude[bot] 52dc08a0e5 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#694)
Issue: #694
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:22:26 +00:00
claude[bot] 78acf2c6ba docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#694)
Issue: #694
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:22:26 +00:00
claude[bot] dcb8f80de2 docs: review document for #694
Issue: #694
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:22:26 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 6f17b6cd4c perf(card): a floor switch stops re-querying the same subtrees (#694)
A floor switch replaces the whole stage, so the card's pointer-hover
MutationObserver receives hundreds of records whose targets are the same
few containers. Each record re-ran `matches` and a `.devlayer` subtree
`querySelector` on its target, and kept doing so after the device layer
had already been found. The batch logic moves to `deviceLayerMutated` in
device-hit-owner.ts: a node is checked at most once per batch, the first
hit ends the checks, and every added node still goes through
`_syncPointerHoverSubtree` in record order. The card shrinks by 12 lines.

The View stair layer read the card's `_model` getter once more for every
navigable stair; the getter rebuilds the config fingerprint on each read.
`renderLayer` now reads it once.

`languageRenderGate` wrote `lang` on the host on every render. It now
writes it only when the value differs (language switch, English fallback,
a foreign value); an unchanged value is left alone.

No behaviour changes: DOM, tooltips and pixels are the same. Unit tests
count subtree queries per node, `_model` reads per render and `lang`
writes; one mutant per change restores the old behaviour.

Issue: #694
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 00:22:26 +00:00
claude[bot] 153fa7a680 docs: review document for #728
Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:19:58 +00:00
claude[bot] fc835cb97d docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:18:39 +00:00
claude[bot] 499c0860df docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#707)
Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:15:55 +00:00
claude[bot] 8df4ef710c docs: review document for #707
Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
2026-10-01 00:15:51 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 1d51beade1 feat(process): risk by changed hunks decides ship and informs show (#707)
The ship limits count lines and files but not what was touched: a
12-line pointerdown handler passed them like a typo and merged unread.
The track rule also lived twice - the guard computed the cycle limit in
bash while process-track.mjs computed the track, and the two disagreed
on multiple track labels. The packet still told authors to rebase
show/ship branches that merge cleanly.

- scripts/change-risk.mjs: one pure classifier over `git diff -U0` from
  the merge base. Class A lines only; comments, blank lines and pure
  renames give no risk; deletions do. Area and token rules per class
  (geometry, touch, migration, devices, perf, ux, visual render/ui),
  evidence as path:line, five per class.
- process-track.mjs: owner confirmation is a comment line
  "Трек: <x> — решение владельца" by the repo owner (latest wins, only
  for the current track); several track labels read as the strictest
  with a warning; cycleLimit, guardLimit and rebaseBeforeReview are the
  single source. `stage` makes the whole S7 track decision in one call:
  ship with risk and no confirmation is raised to show with evidence,
  a confirmed ship keeps merging without the model and records the risk
  for the batch review; show/ask get a risk note for the reviewer.
- _process.yml: the guard asks process-track.mjs for the limit and keeps
  no track logic; the track step calls the script once and only
  executes its raise flag and comment file; risk_note reaches the
  Review prompt, ship_risk reaches the hp:ship-merge comment (marker
  line unchanged).
- task-packet.mjs: track basis, limit and rebase policy; next step
  without the stale rebase line; risk with its consequence per track;
  required checks with reasons (ci:golden only on render risk);
  changelog and visual evidence - from the same exports.
- ship-review.mjs: the batch brief prints the risk line of a ship merge.
- Canon: PROCESS.md §5, §5.1, §10.4, §11.7, both digests, AGENTS.md.
- Registry anchors that watched the moved code are moved, not dropped.

Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-10-01 00:03:35 +00:00
claude[bot] a49f7095ce docs: review document for #728
Issue: #728
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:34:30 +00:00
claude[bot] 3847baa5a0 docs: review document for #727
Issue: #727
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:33:52 +00:00
claude[bot] 5ce83feffa docs: review document for #726
Issue: #726
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:33:09 +00:00
claude[bot] fd082ad460 docs: review document for #725
Issue: #725
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:31:13 +00:00
claude[bot] 85598638c1 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#732)
Issue: #732
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:26:46 +00:00
claude[bot] 0f7ec02352 docs: review document for #732
Issue: #732
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 23:26:46 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 715735d753 refactor(iso): remove the empty overlay renderers and dead fixture fields (#732)
After #714 and #724 the 2.5D overlays still carried stubs:

- renderIsoOverlayGrounds and renderIsoRaisedOverlays returned an empty SVG
  on every frame. They go with IsoFramePresentation.grounds/raised and the two
  bindings in the card. The iso-overlays-svg element itself stays, now empty:
  it is the inert camera-viewBox layer the contract and live-touch smokes
  measure screen-facing HTML against, so the 2.5D DOM keeps its elements.
- IsoOverlayRenderEntry.groundRadius was computed for every device, room label
  and lock and read only by the snapshot comparison that compared it.

The overlay test fixtures passed view, referenceView, stageSize and layers
(and one test selectedDeviceId), which IsoOverlaySceneInput does not have, and
asserted that changing them keeps the placement - a claim the signature makes
by itself. Those fields are gone from every fixture. The zoom/resize asserts of
"Stage 4 reuses pure overlay placements" and "#713 AC3" (renamed to what it
still checks) and the "#570 supersedes #473 W1" selection test go; the #724
AC2 test now zooms the way production does, through the live frame of
resolveIsoScene, and checks that the structural geometry and so the overlay
scene are reused. The #713 K8 fixture no longer passes stageSize, which
resolveIsoOverlayFitEnvelope does not read.

test/iso-overlay-fixture-types.test.mjs typechecks the overlay test files with
the TypeScript compiler: their fixture types (OverlaySceneFixture,
OverlayEntryFixture) are the keys of the production types with deliberately
loose values, so a partial fixture is fine and a field the type lacks is an
excess-property error. Three checks: no excess property in the fixture files;
a probe shows the fixture types resolve to the real inputs and reject view,
referenceView, stageSize, layers, selectedDeviceId and groundRadius; every
call of the scene builder gets its argument through a checked type (a literal
in overlayScene or a declaration of the fixture type). Each check is red when
a dead field is put back into a declared fixture, an override literal or an
entry, when a literal goes straight into the builder, when a fixture loses its
annotation, and when groundRadius returns to the entry type.

isometric-contract now asserts that nothing renders into the overlay surface
and that the removed renderers and groundRadius stay gone. No mutant is
anchored on the removed code; mutation-gate --check is unchanged (3 warnings).
The 19 2.5D golden scenes pass in capture on the accepted baselines.

Issue: #732
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-09-30 23:26:46 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 40607aa37f fix(scripts): isMainModule compares real paths of argv and module (#733)
process.argv[1] keeps the path as typed, so a script started through a
symlink (or from a symlinked directory) still carries the link path there,
while Node builds import.meta.url of the main module from the real path.
The two never matched, and every CLI guarded by isMainModule silently did
nothing and exited 0. Both sides are now resolved with realpathSync before
the pathToFileURL comparison; a path that does not exist is compared as is,
without throwing, exactly as before.

The unit test writes a CLI and a module it imports into a temporary
directory, launches the CLI directly, through a directory link (a junction
on Windows, no admin rights needed) and through a file symlink (skipped on
EPERM), and checks that only the launched script runs its main. It is red
on the previous implementation.

Issue: #733
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-09-30 23:19:47 +00:00
claude[bot] 34423a6236 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#724)
Issue: #724
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 22:39:24 +00:00
claude[bot] 295d61f377 docs: review document for #724
Issue: #724
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 22:39:24 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 5f8e8ca7e8 refactor(iso): drop the 2.5D overlay data nothing reads (#724)
After #714 the 2.5D overlay scene still carried what decides nothing:

- src/iso-overlays.ts: IsoOverlayPlacement loses tether and grounding (always
  invisible) and raisedScene (always equal to visualScene); IsoOverlayOwner
  loses area; IsoOverlayPlacementInput loses hovered, focused, selected and
  filtersSupported, which the resolver ignored. IsoWallSilhouette and
  tetherGeometry go with them.
- src/iso-scene-render.ts: the structural scene no longer projects wall
  silhouettes (isoWallSilhouettesOf and IsoSceneCacheEntry.wallSilhouettes)
  that served only as a cache key. The placement and render-scene caches are
  keyed by the wall geometry the scene is drawn with (IsoOverlaySceneInput.
  structure = scene.geometry): the structural LRU hands out the same object
  across zoom, stage resize and HA state, and a new one after any wall, room
  or opening edit. The resolveCollisions flag and its fit/live cache slots
  are gone: since #713 both held equal placements, and 2.5D renders only in
  View, where the fit probe and the live frame ask with the same devices, so
  they now read one snapshot.
- src/houseplan-card.ts: the fit call passes no flag; the overlay scene gets
  structural.geometry. data-hp-iso-nudged stays the constant "false" read by
  the golden requireOneRise preflight, the live-touch smoke and the benchmark.

Tests: iso-overlays pins the placement fields; iso-scene-render builds the
structure with buildIsoWallGeometry, the #714 zoom/resize and #711 state tests
stay, fit and live are asserted to share one snapshot, and two #724 AC2 tests
run the production path (createIsoStructuralSource -> resolveIsoScene ->
buildIsoOverlayRenderScene): a thicker wall with the same room rebuilds the
scene (red with a key without walls, e.g. keyed by the room rows), and a room
edit that moves the owner gives the new owner (red with a constant key). The
silhouette-construction test goes with the construction.

Mutants: #473 W2 (iso-placement-cache-survives-silhouette-change, id kept for
history) now keys the placement cache by a constant instead of input.structure
and its guard also runs the #724 AC2 tests; W6 patches the new structure line;
the W5 description no longer speaks of a nudge. The isometric-contract regex
checks the new key instead of the silhouette construction. docs/ISOMETRIC.md
names the key.

Live 2.5D output is unchanged: the 21 isometric golden scenes pass on the
accepted baselines.

Issue: #724
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-09-30 22:39:24 +00:00
claude[bot] 108427dc77 docs(reviews): индекс после сдвига каталога (#723)
Issue: #723
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 22:26:44 +00:00
claude[bot] 3e7f7d3936 docs: review document for #723
Issue: #723
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 22:26:44 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 0d85807157 fix(process): publish steps tell a GitHub push refusal from a moved branch (#723)
Two steps publish a commit and treated every failed push as a moved branch:
the release review job (release-review.yml) retried three times with "dev
went ahead", and the review document step (_process.yml) rebased and pushed
again. A refusal by GitHub itself - a token without the workflow right, a
branch rule, a hook - cannot be cured by a retry or a rebase, and the step
never said what GitHub answered.

Both pushes now keep stderr and hand it to the #705 classifier through the
same CLI the rebase guard uses (merge-candidate.mjs --push-refusal). Only a
stale lease (rejected / fetch first / stale info) keeps the old retry or
rebase. Any other outcome stops the step at once, without retries: the log
gets the git answer and the step summary gets the reason and the git answer,
both passed through redactSecrets (token, credential URL, Authorization).
The review document step takes the classifier from dev, as the rebase guard
does: a task branch behind dev may not carry it.

The summary text is written by the new --summary option (refusalSummary),
not by a multi-line string in run:, and both commit messages are now built
line by line into a file instead of a heredoc (PROCESS.md §10.4 item 4).
release-review.yml is dispatch-only and is not mirrored to main. PROCESS.md
names the rule next to the rebase guard; the #638 trailer witness in
test/release-review.test.mjs follows the line-by-line message.

test/publish-push-refusal.test.mjs runs both steps as they are with real
bash and real git in temporary repositories; only the push transport is
replaced: a moved branch is a real neighbour push, a GitHub refusal is a
recorded stderr carrying a token, a credential URL and an Authorization
header. On the old steps 9 of its 11 tests fail.

Issue: #723
User-Visible: no
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 5.5 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_018qZfe7YS4rqEMKoVeS3GKd
2026-09-30 22:26:44 +00:00
claude[bot] 5cd9d0419a docs: review document for #707
Issue: #707
User-Visible: no
2026-09-30 22:21:03 +00:00