Commit Graph
1268 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergey Matyunin 5272287671 test: accept fixture wall key baselines
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 32s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 8m9s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 47s
Validate / process-gate (push) Successful in 40s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 34s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 48s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 20m38s
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 22m20s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 22m32s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 22m59s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 19m3s
Accepted the complete Linux artifact after visual review. Only the dark and light isometric geometry views change intentionally; 106 passing scenarios keep their prior bytes.

Issue: #260
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.10
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32725286757
2026-08-24 15:13:41 +03:00
ClaudeandSergey Matyunin c14dcecb98 test(fixtures): write the real wall key in one place
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 18m12s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 20m2s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 25m25s
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 25s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 42s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 41s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 46s
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 9m15s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 18m47s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 19m9s
Refresh the shared wall-key fixture contract and keep generated frontend bundles synchronized with the fingerprinted geometry fixtures.

Issue: #260
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 15:06:06 +03:00
Claude 523190d8f4 test: one thickness record must not describe two wall roles
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 35s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 46s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 31s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 45s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 46s
Validate / hacs (push) Failing after 16s
Validate / hassfest (push) Failing after 18s
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 9m19s
Validate / backend (push) Failing after 9m31s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 17m56s
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 17m52s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 18m9s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 23m10s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 51m44s
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 26s
The continuity gate cannot see the defect from the owner's 66.json: masonry is
continuous there and the record agrees with what is painted. The record itself
is wrong — a partial resize left 43 steps of a former shared boundary as an
exterior wall while it kept the 20 cm of that boundary, next to 30 cm exterior
neighbours. Thickness followed the key, not the role of the edge.

A width check would not have caught it, and I built one before throwing it away.
It compares the painted body against the record, and here the two agree. On real
plans it also fires where masonry is legitimately wider — columns, junction
influence, abutting parallel walls: 76 to 82 steps measured against 4 expected,
every case legal. A gate that needs explaining half the time is noise.

The defect is expressible in a single state instead: one record whose span is
partly shared and partly exterior. Nobody sets that on purpose. Roles come from
the polygons — a stretch is shared when another room's edge covers it — so the
check needs neither a build nor product code.

Two traps found by measurement, both of which produced false positives. Count
distinct rooms rather than edges: in a corner one room owns two edges, and
counting edges called every exterior corner a shared boundary — 12 and 14 false
positives. And do not sample the endpoints: an endpoint is a node, where a wall
legitimately touches two rooms, and including them reported 95 per cent exterior
on every wall abutting a shared one.

Mutation coverage, stated honestly: the endpoint mutant is killed by the
real-plan test. The rooms-versus-edges mutant survived — once endpoints are
excluded, counting edges gives the same answer on real plans, so that choice is
not load-bearing. I removed the mutant rather than ship a surviving one, and said
so in the code.

Issue: #287
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 13:20:34 +03:00
Claude d5659478aa test: add a second real plan to the masonry gate
The second floor covers one class: the multi-wall corridor eating a neighbouring
wall. The first floor brings what neither it nor any synthetic fixture has —
three virtual spans, two wall columns, two solid edges with no thickness record
at all, and 127 noisy coordinates.

The two plans pin opposite states, which is worth more than two plans with the
same defect: one records a known debt of 181 steps, the other records cleanliness
at zero. A regression is caught in both directions.

A declared virtual span is a declared break, not a defect, so the rule from #285
would have reddened on the first floor's own contract. Samples lying on
open_spans are now excluded: 830 of 6800 on that plan, and the remaining gap
count is zero.

The two zero-thickness solid edges are two grid steps long and covered by the
bodies of their neighbours, so the browser sees no break. Their count is
therefore pinned in the model test rather than the smoke — if it grows, or if the
neighbours stop covering them, that shows up before it becomes a hole.

Both fixtures must stay noisy: the project's synthetic models carry exactly zero
noise, which is why #258 and #248 are not reproducible on them. A profile check
asserts at least a hundred noisy coordinates each, so a future write barrier run
over the fixtures cannot quietly rob them of their purpose.

Privacy: names, ids, markers, device bindings and layout are gone; geometry
stays, coordinates unchanged, because they are the point.

Issue: #286
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 13:10:33 +03:00
Claude c654e0ec42 test(smoke): masonry of a real plan must not break
Eight closed issues on wall junctions — #271, #272, #275, #276, #277, #278,
\#279, #280 — shipped in beta.9, and the break in the owner's real plan
survived. Every one of them was accepted on synthetic fixtures: a cell-5
mixed-depth T, a rectilinear T with three equal half-depths. On those the fixes
work.

The smoke asks the product itself, through isPointInFill on the wall path,
whether masonry exists where the model promises it. That is independent of both
resolution and the pixel-diff thresholds which miss this class: a 45-step break
on a large plan is a fraction of a per cent of the frame, well under the 0.05
per cent scene tolerance.

Measured on the shipped code: four breaks, 181 grid steps in total, 45.25 each.
That number is derivable rather than incidental — the node joins a 30 cm
exterior wall, a 30 cm spur and an arm five steps long; half-depth 15,
MITRE_LIMIT 4, corridor radius 60, and 60 − 15 = 45 steps are cut out of the
neighbouring 20 cm wall. The corridor eats the masonry, which is what #271 and
\#275 describe.

The fixture is privacy-minimised — neutral room names and ids, no device
bindings — and keeps its coordinates, because they are the point. It lives in
test/fixtures rather than demo/fixtures on purpose: sourceFingerprint hashes the
.mjs of demo/fixtures and demo/golden, so anything added there staleizes the
committed bundle and the screenshot manifest at once. Verified after this
commit: bundle still fresh, screenshots still current.

The debt is recorded as numbers and compared exactly. Better and the test asks
for the numbers to be updated, which proves the improvement; worse and it
catches the regression. Verified by execution in both directions.

Issue: #285
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 13:02:56 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin d8696315eb test: stabilize opening distance smoke
Issue: #281
User-Visible: no
v1.67.0-beta.9
2026-08-24 11:04:17 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin ed606c0f4a docs: refresh beta 9 screenshots
Issue: #279
Issue: #280
Issue: #281
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:55:56 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 89658c20fe build: prepare v1.67.0-beta.9 candidate
Issue: #279
Issue: #280
Issue: #281
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 10:54:02 +03:00
Claude a988f7c6f1 test: measure how far the stored geometry sits off the lattice
Stage 0 of ADR #282. A lattice node is k/240, which has no exact binary
representation, and a stored coordinate is a float. Nobody could say how much of
a real plan is affected, and Optimize promises to remove coordinate noise
without a definition of noise that can be checked.

latticeProfile splits every coordinate of the model into three populations,
because they are three different problems: exactly on a node, near a node but
not exact, and legitimately off grid. The middle one is the defect class behind
\#258, \#279 and the non-converging Optimize; the last one is authored geometry
the current model allows and must not be called a violation.

Measured on the owner's installation: space 1 has 208 coordinates, 33.65 per
cent exactly on a node and 65.38 per cent in the noise class; space 2 has 21.23
against 78.77. The worst deviation is 8e-8 of a step — invisible, and enough to
put a wall key in the neighbouring bucket.

The counterpart is what makes it worth having: every shipped fixture has zero
noise, all of its off-grid values being authored. Our own test data therefore
cannot reproduce this class by construction, which is why the owner finds these
defects and the gates do not. A test pins that property so it cannot drift.

No violations are produced, no gate turns red, and nothing is repaired: what to
do with a vertex 8e-8 from a node is the owner's decision, and this measures its
price first.

Issue: #283
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:45:48 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin d73790aaab merge: synchronize dev into issue 281
Issue: #281
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:44:23 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 07bd1a6781 fix: reconcile outer walls before resize
Issue: #281
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 10:43:33 +03:00
Claude 0963f5b4dd docs(adr): decide the wall geometry representation
Nine of the last ten specs are one class of defect, 23 fix commits in thirty
days, 595 tolerance mentions across ten geometry modules, one every seventh line
in resize.ts. The specs rate their own risk at 9 and 10 of 10, and two titles
show where that arrived: a nearly orthogonal T junction, and a union failure
that must merely damage less.

The ADR names three properties of the data model that produce the stream — a
float coordinate on a 1/240 step, an identity derived instead of stored, and a
wall living in two representations at once — and records four stages against
them. Stage 0 is accepted for implementation; the rest are direction, in the
same sense as #34.

Issue: #282
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:41:53 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin a3e5f30a3c docs: specify honest resize eligibility
Issue: #281
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:35:13 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 38ea8a9b9e fix: validate optimize opening rehosts
Issue: #280
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 10:33:05 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 93fad8cfb4 docs: specify optimize rehost validation
Issue: #280
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:28:59 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin c0c30d645a fix: preserve near-orthogonal wall junctions
Issue: #279
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 10:27:13 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin cd9916d72a docs: specify near-orthogonal junction protection
Issue: #279
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 10:24:03 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8aa7fc970c Release v1.67.0-beta.8 candidate
Package the reviewed Optimize reconciliation, safe fixed-topology Resize and wall-union isolation fixes from #276, #277 and #278 as the eighth v1.67 prerelease candidate.

Issue: #278
User-Visible: yes
v1.67.0-beta.8
2026-08-24 09:39:11 +03:00
claude[bot] bb81ede47c docs: review document for #278
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Skipped
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Skipped
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 31s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 31s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 37s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 38s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 35s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / frontend (push) Skipped
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 48s
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:35:58 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 79285ab1d2 docs: correct wall union mutation identifiers
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 09:30:29 +03:00
claude[bot] c123757f50 docs: review document for #278
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:29:20 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 495043791e test: accept wall union isolation baselines
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.8
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32695276495
2026-08-24 09:04:20 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 598e7437f2 test: isolate optimize fixture from pending geometry write
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 08:55:38 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin df1a8330f4 docs: accept wall union screenshots
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32694995425
2026-08-24 08:53:04 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8156f80140 fix: isolate wall union failures and guard geometry writes
Issue: #278
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 08:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 930a911a36 docs: review document for #278
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 08:48:37 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 4dd074d9a3 docs: address wall union spec review
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 08:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin bdd4f38cb9 docs: review document for #278
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 08:48:37 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 4412f905bd docs: specify wall union isolation
Issue: #278
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 08:48:37 +03:00
claude[bot] e68b494555 docs: review document for #277
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 47s
Validate / docs (push) Successful in 52s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 45s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 32s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / frontend (push) Skipped
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 43s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Skipped
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Skipped
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 05:15:13 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin a548d4f17d docs: accept Resize performance screenshots
Reviewed artifact: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32691836025

Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:58:13 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 9c5b66c3e4 perf: fingerprint Resize handles once per frame
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:56:49 +03:00
claude[bot] 448ceea399 docs: review document for #277
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 04:53:17 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 241821c40e test: accept beta.8 safe resize baselines
Accept the complete 106-frame Linux golden artifact. All 104 existing scenarios passed; six byte-only PNG refreshes have zero pixel diff, and both new safe-resize light/dark candidates were manually reviewed.

Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.8
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32689229827
2026-08-24 07:21:19 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin b02a37123d test: align mixed-thickness smoke with safe resize
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:20:25 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 03b45f2e37 build: synchronize safe resize release bundle
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:13:56 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin a5a0f6da2c docs: accept safe resize screenshots
Reviewed artifact: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32689026469

Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:12:32 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 2e22ed7938 fix: stop resize before lossy metadata rekey
Issue: #277
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 07:10:27 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin cd0a682ad7 test: align legacy resize smokes with safe mode
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 07:07:20 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 6335b0e519 fix: make room resize topology-safe
Issue: #277
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-24 07:03:24 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 8b227962b1 docs: review document for #277
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:31:15 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 1bbd53ee52 docs: address safe resize spec review
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:31:15 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 7be7f8cd99 docs: review document for #277
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:31:15 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 9e35650470 docs: specify safe fixed-topology resize
Issue: #277
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 06:31:15 +03:00
claude[bot] 29a0305558 docs: review document for #276
Validate / backend (push) Failing after 16m13s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 24m11s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 25m33s
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 16m12s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 18m2s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 33m56s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 34s
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 36s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 41s
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 42s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 22s
Validate / hacs (push) Failing after 13s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 40s
Validate / hassfest (push) Failing after 17s
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 6m56s
Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 03:29:16 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin ff2f2063cf test: stabilize Optimize overhead benchmark
Use paired ABBA/BAAB batches for the p95 gate and accept the complete 104-frame Linux golden artifact. The four new #276 scenes were visually reviewed; every existing scene passed, and the nine byte changes contain zero pixels above their comparison threshold.

Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.8
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32684802336
2026-08-24 06:19:13 +03:00
claude[bot] b5519e997b docs: review document for #276
Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 03:13:45 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 82fe98bcd3 test: prove coincident partition acceptance
Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 05:57:57 +03:00
claude[bot] 57fdfdbd83 docs: review document for #276
Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 02:51:26 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 496e79a6df docs: refresh screenshot fingerprint
Issue: #276
User-Visible: no
2026-08-24 05:32:14 +03:00