Commit Graph
1153 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 61b437fd3f docs: review document for #261
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:35:26 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 9f6efd0c11 docs: specify multi-wall wedge repair
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:35:26 +03:00
Claude 18d504631c test(smoke): cover the binding picker
git grep _bindingCandidates -- test/ demo/ was empty: the function that decides
what the user is offered under Add had no test and no smoke. Tombstones were
covered from every side, the list they filter was never asked. That is how #262
reached us through a user report instead of a gate — smoke_hidden_flag assigns
binding straight into _markerDialog and bypasses the picker entirely.

Twelve checks against the real bundle: a deleted device is offered again, a
deleted plain entity is offered again behind the checkbox, the checkbox itself
is the trap (a device entity is absent with it off, present with it on, and it
starts off for a new marker), a placed binding is not duplicated, and re-adding
replaces the tombstone and leaves the picker.

The twelfth pins the known defect #262 as current behaviour: a device tombstone
still hides its child entities. Fixing it turns the check red and forces it to
be flipped, so the fix cannot pass the coverage by.

smoke-links registers only the pure tombstone helpers. The picker names itself
and is found by direct match; the helpers are not named anywhere in the
scenario. Verified by probe: touching src/devices.ts alone selects this smoke
as a registered link, and without the entry nothing would select it.

Issue: #263
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:32:57 +03:00
claude[bot] 9f63163339 docs: review document for #258
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 21s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 26s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / frontend (push) Skipped
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 1m4s
Validate / process-gate (push) Successful in 51s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 44s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Skipped
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Skipped
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:46:19 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 61bf537b58 docs: correct wall-key changelog claim
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:40:14 +03:00
claude[bot] aa85a95b32 docs: review document for #258
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:38:37 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 28eaf86662 fix: stabilize wall keys across storage round-trips
Issue: #258
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 14:21:36 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 46a83de181 docs: review document for #258
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:18:10 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin b9a5f6c4e4 docs(spec): define stable wall key round-trip
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:18:10 +03:00
Claude 5e95a28406 test: grade the wall-key invariant by what the product does
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 25s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 1m13s
Validate / provenance (push) Failing after 1m16s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 1m25s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 1m9s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 58s
Validate / hacs (push) Failing after 17s
Validate / hassfest (push) Failing after 20s
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 10m20s
Validate / backend (push) Failing after 9m54s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 18m2s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 17m49s
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 15m44s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 15m1s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 13m49s
The first cut of checkWallKeys compared the stored key against endpoints
snapped to the lattice and called any mismatch a violation. Both halves were
wrong, and measurement says so: wallIntervals reports the query key for the
disputed edge as 0.887500,0.195833@1.5706, i.e. the form built from the
coordinates as stored, and the two owner configurations that differ in exactly
these keys produce byte-identical wall bodies and multi-wall node maps. The
check would have reddened a plan that renders correctly.

Graded now: a drift inside the tolerant fallback's half-pitch reach is an
observation, a key beyond it or one that does not parse as coordinates is a
violation. The threshold is expressed in grid steps with a 1e-3 slack — with a
relative 1e-6 the four identically drifted records of one plan split between
the two classes on their last bits, so the check repeated the very rounding tie
it exists to expose.

visual-matrix leaves KEY_CONTRACT_DEBT: its keys drift inside the reach and now
read as observations. large-house stays — its labels do not parse, and
wallIntervals shows all 80 solid edges resolving to zero thickness (#260).

Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:11:22 +03:00
Claude 2970b8091b ci(process): ask the reviewer about the wall key invariant
Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:51:37 +03:00
Claude 7b267fb632 test: check the wall key against the lattice edge
#258 lost two thickness records to a rounding tie: wallKey quantises the
midpoint with Math.round, and a wall of odd step length has its midpoint
exactly on the tie, where the exact node 83/240 and the stored 0.345833333
fall on opposite sides. The #254 invariants pass on that file — their edge
tolerance is 0.004 and the drift is 0.00417, so the check sits on its own
boundary.

checkWallKeys compares strings, and against endpoints snapped to the lattice:
keying from the raw endpoints flags the healthy state and passes the broken
one, which is what the first formulation in #258 got wrong. Measured on the
owner's before/after pair: 0 findings before, exactly the two artefact walls
after.

Two shipped fixtures write keys off the contract (#260); recorded as a number,
so the debt can neither grow nor be silently fixed.

Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:50:37 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8c7e8bc9d1 chore(release): prepare v1.67.0-beta.4
Issue: #249
Issue: #251
Issue: #252
Issue: #253
Issue: #256
User-Visible: yes
v1.67.0-beta.4
2026-08-23 12:06:29 +03:00
claude[bot] f5ec6718a2 docs: review document for #253
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:59:49 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin ffb609d471 docs: refresh screenshots for wall resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:46:43 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin bfdeb493cb fix: preserve wall thickness across partial resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 11:42:43 +03:00
claude[bot] 9d6a4e34fd docs: review document for #253
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:30:43 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin d9f7861c05 docs: specify lossless wall resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:19:47 +03:00
claude[bot] 6dd59a1925 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
claude[bot] b9e4be3799 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 86a0786e2d docs: refresh screenshot fingerprint after rebase
Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32625765217

Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 0dbc94739b chore: remove obsolete Optimize warning copy
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 074a9ee86d chore: revalidate rebased issue branch
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
claude[bot] e383fc2989 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 4edb2bb2eb test: assert Optimize cleanup selection copy
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] b56f119f7a test(golden): accept orphan cleanup dialogs
Accepted the complete 97-scenario Linux artifact after visual review. The intentional golden changes are limited to the EN/Dark and RU/Light Optimize orphan-cleanup dialogs; all 95 passing raster candidates were restored to their prior bytes and hashes. The canonical docs artifact used the same Chromium and refreshed its source fingerprint; eight frames were identical, while two differed by only 2 and 17 sub-threshold pixels.

Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.4
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32623704126
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 36b5a8c36c fix: clean orphaned Optimize positions
Issue: #252
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
claude[bot] a41035d185 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] eefe0fab94 docs: clarify orphan cleanup invariant
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
claude[bot] 759111beb3 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 63db3ae4c6 docs: specify orphan layout cleanup
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Claude 4b6331f8d8 docs(process): описать приведение ветки к dev до код-ревью
Issue: #257
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 10:56:41 +03:00
Claude 10999a5c5c ci(process): привести ветку к dev до код-ревью, а не после
Ревью шло по ветке как есть, слияние делало ребейз: проверенный SHA и
слитый SHA были разными коммитами. Текстовое расхождение ловил конфликт,
смысловое git склеивал молча — так пришёл регресс #234. Заодно конфликт
обнаруживался после сорока минут работы ревьюера, хотя виден до них.

Новый шаг для этапа code, сразу после выбора ветки: потомок dev —
ничего; отстала и ребейзится — ребейз, push с --force-with-lease, ревью
приведённого состояния и запись о ребейзе в промпт (§7.2 требует полного
разбора); конфликт — возврат в S6-in-progress без запуска ревью.

Issue: #257
User-Visible: no
(cherry picked from commit 793a6486d8)
2026-08-23 10:55:44 +03:00
claude[bot] 2d1fca1dfa docs: review document for #256
Issue: #256
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 07:31:55 +00:00
Matysh a952f5fd07 feat(api): let config/get and layout/get return less
Issue: #256
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 10:22:51 +03:00
Matysh 6d0fa3b819 build: stop committing the stand copy of the bundle
Issue: #255
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 10:15:45 +03:00
Matysh 7e69b4bb28 ci: shard the smoke suite and stop validating review docs
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:55:04 +03:00
Matysh 74d2285d1b ci: ask the reviewer about numbers seen twice
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:50:06 +03:00
Matysh dc3c083352 test: one number, one source — as a checkable rule
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:49:22 +03:00
Matysh 59be468506 test: run model invariants over every shipped model
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:40:50 +03:00
Matysh 2c74b12101 docs: put the invariant check into the local gate
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:34:48 +03:00
Matysh 5cf52707c4 test: check model invariants for references and wall records
Issue: #254
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 09:34:32 +03:00
claude[bot] c8d7d282a4 docs: review document for #251
Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 06:01:30 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 4d5f7f50f1 docs: refresh capture fingerprint after golden fix
Update the documentation capture source fingerprint after the golden-matrix correction. All ten canonical frames were reviewed; two sub-threshold raster-noise candidates were kept byte-identical to HEAD and only the manifest changed.

Capture: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32621056471

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:46:37 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 527081919a test(golden): accept rebased junction baselines
Accept the complete 96-scenario Linux artifact after the #251 rebase exposed the unaccepted #249 junction visuals. Reviewed changes are limited to thirteen bounded-junction frames and the new multi-wall bevel scene; all passed raster-noise candidates were restored.

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.4
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32620456718
2026-08-23 08:37:04 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin f12418ba1c test(golden): correct multiwall bevel probe
Use the discarded-wedge centre derived by the #249 unit geometry instead of a point that lies inside the legitimate incident wall body. This restores the semantic golden contract exposed while rebasing #251; product rendering is unchanged.

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:28:51 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin bde9a40ef4 docs: refresh screenshots after controller rebase
Accept the complete canonical Linux documentation capture for the rebased #249 + #251 source tree. All eight changed frames were reviewed; the two unchanged PNGs remain byte-identical.

Capture: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32619669409

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:12:25 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin cba2b5ab50 docs: review document for #251
Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:08:34 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 4b19376a81 test(smoke): mark cover controller available
Keep the cover-precedence scenario focused on target state mirroring by explicitly providing a live own entity after #251 separated controller availability from target availability.

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:08:34 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 0108b26655 test(golden): accept v1.67.0-beta.4 controller states
Accepted the complete Linux artifact after visual review. Only device-icon-state-table light/dark change intentionally; seven within-threshold renderer-noise images were restored to their prior bytes and hashes.

Issue: #251
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.4
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32617372743
2026-08-23 08:08:34 +03:00