Commit Graph
2145 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot] 9293109ba1 docs: review document for #516
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 35s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 53s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 22s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 22s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m1s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 11m54s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 4m28s
Issue: #516
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:39:17 +00:00
claude[bot] 96bfd94313 docs: review document for #516
Issue: #516
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:39:17 +00:00
claude[bot] 440460255b docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:37:26 +00:00
claude[bot] ed6d1d76db docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] a8a9b7d99e docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] 39571e20d6 docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 0796a01571 ci: the E2E gate recognises its run by the suites that install the tag
Two findings from the live run on v1.73.0 (houseplan-e2e run
34393136097): the upgrade job carries the previous stable's tag in its
name, so "any job with HP <tag>" let a gate for v1.72.0 adopt the
v1.73.0 run — recognition now keys on `journeys`/`first-run`; and the
first poll after a dispatch sees only the matrix-planning job, which
marked the run as foreign forever — a run without any `· HP … ·` job is
undecided and polled again. Live: v1.73.0 → green with the run link,
v1.72.0 → no run of its own.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 57b19f9914 ci: the E2E gate upgrades from the previous stable, not from the tag under test
Live run on v1.73.0 (houseplan-e2e run 34392391382): at `release:
published` the new tag is already the newest stable, so
`upgrade_from=stable` made the upgrade suite update v1.73.0 onto itself
and fail with `Expected: not "1.73.0"`. The gate now resolves the newest
non-prerelease, non-draft release other than the tag from `gh release
list` and passes it as `upgrade_from`; the first stable ever falls back
to `stable`. Spec §4/§6 record the change and the matrix-planning job in
houseplan-e2e (a job-level `if` cannot read `matrix.*`).

Mutant: release-upgrades-stable-onto-itself.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] c50458a098 ci: a stable release waits for a green E2E run on a real Home Assistant
The stable gate proved Validate and Full Performance on the exact SHA but
never ran the release in Home Assistant itself. houseplan-e2e installs
the release's houseplan.zip — the bytes HACS ships — into HA in docker
and walks the sidebar page, dashboards, roles, PDF, restart and the
stable→tag upgrade. release.yml now dispatches e2e.yml on the tag for
`!prerelease` releases and waits for it (scripts/e2e-gate.mjs, modelled
on validate-gate.mjs): the gate recognises its own run by `HP <tag>` in
the job names, ignores foreign dispatches, and reports red / missing /
cancelled / token error with the run link. Betas are untouched.

Mutants: release-ships-on-red-e2e, release-trusts-foreign-e2e-run.

Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] d20ef60037 docs: review document for #514
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 8f037a74dc docs: spec for #514 — E2E on a real Home Assistant as the stable release gate
Issue: #514
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:18:51 +00:00
claude[bot] ad2858a80c docs: review document for #515
Issue: #515
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:13:52 +00:00
claude[bot] 3c1b4ebee2 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:55:09 +00:00
claude[bot] be93291065 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:02:08 +00:00
claude[bot] 6ac513caa0 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:49:18 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] e38beed796 fix: the summary panel settings dialog scrolls in Home Assistant
In HA hp-dialog renders ha-dialog, whose own `.body` is the scroller and
is not a flex container; `.summary-editor` (overflow:auto,
overscroll-behavior:contain, min-height:0) therefore grew to its content
and became a scroll container that never scrolls — Chromium stops wheel
and touch scroll chaining at such a child, so nothing moved (reproduced
on ha.jbstudio.pro, HA 2026.9.1, and in an isolated Playwright page).
hp-dialog gains an opt-in `flex-content` attribute forwarded as
ha-dialog's `flexcontent`, which lays the body out as a flex column: the
editor is height-bound again and scrolls itself, header and footer stay,
exactly as the native branch already did. Only the summary dialog opts in.

Smoke demo/smoke_summary_dialog_scroll.mjs stubs ha-dialog after the HA
2026.9 contract: wheel on desktop, touch swipe on a phone, dialog within
the viewport, and a witness that the stub reproduces the bug without
flexcontent. Docs screenshots: 11/11 pixel-identical (docs:accept
--identical, #512), fingerprint refreshed.

Mutants: summary-dialog-drops-flex-content, hp-dialog-ignores-flex-content.

Issue: #508
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-09 19:49:18 +00:00
claude[bot] 6b592c13c0 docs: review document for #502
Issue: #502
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:35:30 +00:00
claude[bot] 72764cff90 docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:21:54 +00:00
claude[bot] f02af9330b docs: review document for #508
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 19:01:45 +00:00
claude[bot] fa01aa00bf docs: review document for #513
Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:09:24 +00:00
Codex 0b9acd6382 docs: the local pre-push gate no longer calls the full mutation registry a pre-release gate
Code review r1 (M1): scripts/pre-push-gate.mjs — in its comment and in
the text every developer sees before a push — still named the full
mutation registry a pre-release gate; the same phrase lived in the
header of test/mutation-gate.test.mjs. Both now point at the nightly
schedule (#513); golden/smokes/HA harness are named as the heavy
Validate set on the candidate.

Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 21:00:54 +03:00
claude[bot] f5fb7a0f8a docs: review document for #513
Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 17:58:17 +00:00
Codex 61905bacdc ci: full mutation gate runs nightly, outside the development and release cycle
The full registry run proves that tests can fail, not that the product
works; 4 of its 5 runs since 02.09 were manual dispatches tied to
releases. Owner decision 09.09: a daily schedule (01:00 UTC, before the
02:30 nightly Validate), failures reported as an issue by the existing
#472 job, no place in the development or release flow. Docs and the
workflow comments say so; the test pins the daily cron.

Issue: #513
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 20:49:08 +03:00
claude[bot] 9b65d4bcf7 docs: review document for #512
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 36s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/3): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m0s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 41s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 19s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m10s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 12m6s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 5m0s
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 16:15:24 +00:00
Codex b7d8b9e6ee test: displayed version through a seam; docs:accept --identical for pixel-identical screenshots
Golden frames carried the card version text (about, version banner,
support/export previews), so every beta bump re-accepted up to 20
baselines that had not visually changed. The version now reaches the DOM
and stand requests through displayVersion() (src/card-version.ts); the
golden harness pins window.__HP_VERSION_OVERRIDE__ = '0.0.0-golden'
before the card is created. CARD_VERSION literals stay where the release
contract reads them; cache-busting and the console banner keep the literal.

Docs screenshots: `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` re-captures
locally, compares decoded RGBA pixels with the committed frames inside
Chromium (scripts/png-identical.mjs) and, only when every frame is
identical, refreshes the manifest fingerprints and captureScriptSha256;
bytes stay, any difference refuses with a per-frame count. First run on
this tree: 11/11 identical, manifest refreshed.

Mutants: version-seam-ignores-override, docs-identical-accepts-any-frame.

Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:53:38 +03:00
claude[bot]andCodex e5a62f7ffd docs: review document for #512
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
Codex 7674b78c33 docs: spec #512 r2 — capture.mjs untouched, --identical refreshes the capture-script guard
Spec review r1 (H1): the `--out` flag would have changed the only file
guarded by `captureScriptSha256` and reddened check-docs on its own. The
identical-accept mode now leaves demo/docs/capture.mjs as is (frames are
backed up and restored around the standard capture) and takes
`captureScriptSha256` from the candidate manifest together with the
source fingerprint; the docs re-acceptance for this issue is the first
local --identical run in the same branch.

Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
claude[bot]andCodex 3f402a3481 docs: review document for #512
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
Codex 278d9257eb docs: spec for #512 — version seam outside golden frames, docs:accept --identical
Issue: #512
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:52:44 +03:00
claude[bot] 33cb131b3a docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:52:11 +00:00
claude[bot] 8acbd333d8 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:43:09 +00:00
Codex 00130e08aa ci: a cancelled Validate dispatch proves nothing to the review gate
Code review r1 (M1): validate-gate.mjs and merge-candidate's waitValidate
read a `cancelled` dispatch run on the material as red, so a dispatch
replaced by the next one in the `validate-dispatch-<ref>` concurrency
group would have returned the task S7→S6 for nothing — the same class
#511 fixed in release-gate.mjs. Cancelled runs are now ignored: the gate
follows the replacement dispatch, or starts its own when there is none.

Mutant: review-returns-task-on-cancelled-dispatch.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 18:33:24 +03:00
claude[bot] f6e64ba985 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:29:18 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 97dfa457a4 ci: diff mutants only on request; the review pipeline proves them on the material before reviewing
Validate ran the three "Мутанты по диффу" shards on every push of every
branch: 48 of 56 job-hours on 08–09.09, most of them cancelled by the
next push. Mutants now run when asked — pull requests, the nightly
schedule, a push carrying a `Release:` trailer, or a dispatch with
`mutants=true` (classify-changes.mjs → `mutants_requested`); an ordinary
push runs the light checks only.

The proof moves to where it is consumed. process.yml gets a gate after
the #499 reuse step: on the code stage it looks for a dispatch Validate
run on the exact material SHA whose mutant jobs executed and passed
(scripts/validate-gate.mjs); none → it dispatches one and waits; red or
missing → the task goes back S7→S6 with the run link and the review
cycle is not spent. Spec stage and the reuse fast-path skip the gate
(`proceed=true`); all later steps branch on `proceed` in place of the
old conflict conjunct only. merge-candidate.mjs dispatches Validate on
the pushed candidate and waits for that dispatch run.

PROCESS.md/AGENTS.md: review does not start on red code; one handoff —
one push.

Mutants: mutants-run-on-every-push, review-starts-on-red-validate,
review-trusts-push-run-without-mutants, merge-waits-push-run-without-mutants.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 34c5c2d134 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 73d6e2eeeb docs: spec #510 r4 — proceed replaces only the conflict conjunct
Spec review r3: `proceed` is true on the reuse fast-path too, so it must
replace the `rebase.conflict != 'true'` conjunct alone; the existing
`reuse != 'true'` (#499), stage and decide conjuncts stay on every step
that has them. The "single variable" claim is narrowed accordingly.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 24cd39fca5 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 65526a6a7f docs: spec #510 r3 — one branching variable for the gate outcome
Spec review r2: §5.2 named the gate outcome three different ways; the
skip branch (spec stage, reuse fast-path) would have matched a literal
`result != 'green'` and produced a spurious S7→S6 return. All step
conditions now branch on `proceed` only (true = green or skipped, false =
red/missing); `result` feeds the comment text alone.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] b593489041 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] a91ba16a5c docs: spec #510 r2 — gate after reuse, proof requires executed mutant jobs
Spec review r1: place the gate after the #499 reuse step so its output is
defined; a green dispatch counts only when the "Мутанты по диффу" jobs ran
and passed (a foreign dispatch with mutants=false leaves them skipped);
therefore the Validate job runs whenever mutants are requested, even on an
empty selection. Explicit User-Visible/UX/i18n N/A statement added.

Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] 1063156f12 docs: review document for #510
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
Codexandclaude[bot] 2b8b7b2aa7 docs: spec for #510 — mutants on the review candidate, review waits for a green Validate, handoff rules
Issue: #510
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 15:14:20 +00:00
claude[bot] eed7239aa3 docs: review document for #511
Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 14:45:45 +00:00
Codex 9d8f89d260 ci: release gate judges the latest non-cancelled Validate run of the SHA
The gate used to require every Validate run on the tag SHA to be green:
a cancelled duplicate or a red flake that a later re-run had fixed kept
the stable release blocked (v1.73.0, 09.09 — released by hand). Now the
verdict comes from the newest run that was not cancelled: not completed →
wait, success → pass, anything else → fail, no run → wait. The same rule
is documented for the perf workflow and the release runbook.

Mutants: release-gate-counts-cancelled-runs, release-gate-oldest-run-wins.

Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 17:38:48 +03:00
claude[bot] 590b3a7e67 docs: review document for #511
Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 14:27:52 +00:00
claude[bot] 6842b69eed docs: review document for #511
Issue: #511
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 14:20:48 +00:00
Codex 913e3187f1 Release v1.73.0
Promote the nine published v1.73.0 betas without new product behaviour:
stable version fields, synchronized generated bundles, the aggregated
bilingual release notes from v1.72.0 and status metadata only. beta.9
carried the startup-regression fix (#506) that Full Performance caught on
the first promotion attempt; the stable body keeps it out as an in-line
regression per the #328 curation rules.

Issue: #506
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0
2026-09-09 15:22:01 +03:00
Codex a9d0cab2dd Prepare v1.73.0-beta.9
Version fields and generated bundles move to 1.73.0-beta.9; the #506
changelog entry leaves Unreleased for the beta.9 section; release notes and
STATUS describe the startup-regression fix that unblocks the stable
promotion. No product change beyond #506, already reviewed and merged.

Issue: #506
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.73.0-beta.9
2026-09-09 14:40:28 +03:00
claude[bot] 480180290e docs: review document for #506
Issue: #506
User-Visible: no
2026-09-09 11:35:33 +00:00
Codex 9d6ac98d3a fix: attach a warm summary runtime before the first render (#506)
Every card instance attached its summary-panel runtime through
import().then(), even when the chunk had loaded long ago. The first render
therefore measured a header without summary controls; the controls arrived
a beat later, the stage shrank, the deferred refit opened a `stage-resize`
continuity candidate and the first HA tick paid three extra render passes
(Full Performance: blend stateUpdate1 50 → 130 ms, overlay 217 → 809 ms;
locally 4 performUpdate per tick instead of 1).

summary-runtime-loader.ts separates the summary code from its state: the
loaded factory is cached per page, every host builds its own runtime from
it (no shared preferences, drafts, subscriptions, timers or DOM). A warm
factory yields the runtime synchronously in connectedCallback, before the
first Lit render; a cold mount still pays one lazy import, concurrent cold
mounts share the pending import, a failed import is forgotten so the next
connection retries, and a disconnect cancels the pending attachment of that
connection. SummaryRuntimeSlot owns the per-host lifecycle so the card core
stays under its line ceiling.

Witnesses: loader unit tests (distinct instances, shared pending import,
cancelled attachment, retry after failure); demo/smoke_summary_warm_attach
(warm replacement and cold-key instance on a warm page own the runtime
before the first render, header/stage stable from the first frame, no
stage-resize, one performUpdate per geometry-neutral tick, a real viewport
resize still opens stage-resize); mutant summary-runtime-attaches-after-
first-render. smoke_summary_panel waited for `_summary` as a readiness
proxy; it now waits for the server config load, which stays asynchronous.

Local paired glow benchmarks (4× CPU throttle): blend 159.7 → 49.9 ms and
overlay 326.7 → 120.4 ms at stateUpdate1 with renders 4 → 1; the isometric
load loses the three summary-owned long tasks.

Docs screenshots: all 11 frames decode pixel-identical to the committed
ones; the manifest carries only the new source fingerprint. Initial View
ceiling recentred 299 100 → 299 600 for the +299 B loader.

Issue: #506
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-09 13:57:53 +03:00