Commit Graph
1182 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
Sergey Matyunin dd4ebb7401 docs(spec): require hole-free multi-wall joins
Issue: #272
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:20:28 +03:00
claude[bot] 67863d68a4 docs: review document for #271
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 18:19:52 +00:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin c0b231fa06 docs: review document for #271
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:09:56 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin c190a698c5 docs: refresh merged finite-ray evidence
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:09:56 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8bd910ed84 test: cover finite wall beside an opening
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:09:56 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin dc94e016ca docs: review document for #271
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:06:20 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin e3b635aba2 fix(walls): bound multi-wall repairs to finite rays
Issue: #271
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 21:06:20 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin ffbbb217b5 docs: review document for #271
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:06:00 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 154af2692f docs(spec): define finite multi-wall ray contract
Issue: #271
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 21:06:00 +03:00
claude[bot] d68e876f78 docs: review document for #273
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 17:33:06 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 3ab3cdc1e4 docs: record optimizer topology evidence
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 20:23:08 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 105a8f70eb fix: collapse thickness island beside one T-node
Issue: #273
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 20:20:03 +03:00
claude[bot] 3e8733ad27 docs: review document for #273
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 17:10:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin e2de0dbcc4 spec(optimize): narrow topology island guard
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 20:03:50 +03:00
claude[bot] 6e2247aa3d docs: review document for #273
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 16:50:00 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin b5fbe633a6 docs(spec): handle topology-adjacent thickness islands
Issue: #273
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 19:41:22 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin b86da0d419 test(golden): accept v1.67.0-beta.5 wall baselines
Accepted the complete 98-scenario Linux artifact after visual review. The intentional changes are the new wall-key round-trip regression scene and four large-house frames where #258 restores the fixture's real walls; all 93 passing candidates remain on their prior bytes.

Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.67.0-beta.5
Baseline-Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32649309598
v1.67.0-beta.5
2026-08-23 18:57:59 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 1d0e0c5ab8 chore(release): prepare v1.67.0-beta.5
Issue: #258
Issue: #261
Issue: #262
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 18:40:44 +03:00
claude[bot] 3e3fb9ceaa docs: review document for #262
Issue: #262
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:54:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 5fa2dc2893 docs: mark child re-add ready for review
Issue: #262
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 16:41:15 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 2d6b6006fe docs: record canonical screenshots for child re-add
Issue: #262
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 16:40:24 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8cdf6b4894 fix: restore one child of a deleted device
Issue: #262
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 16:32:12 +03:00
claude[bot] a0b39b626f docs: review document for #262
Issue: #262
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:25:44 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 7b3ea3769a docs: specify child entity re-add lifecycle
Issue: #262
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 16:19:48 +03:00
claude[bot] 98dce8d0b4 docs: review document for #261
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:13:14 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 0d0a9dd87a docs: record rebased implementation evidence
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:41:55 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 4eda889922 chore: refresh validation after rebase
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:41:18 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 2e53cb0e05 test: register and refresh junction evidence
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:35:39 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 0dc6c39784 fix: retain bounded T-junction masonry
Issue: #261
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 15:35:27 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 61b437fd3f docs: review document for #261
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:35:26 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 9f6efd0c11 docs: specify multi-wall wedge repair
Issue: #261
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:35:26 +03:00
Claude 18d504631c test(smoke): cover the binding picker
git grep _bindingCandidates -- test/ demo/ was empty: the function that decides
what the user is offered under Add had no test and no smoke. Tombstones were
covered from every side, the list they filter was never asked. That is how #262
reached us through a user report instead of a gate — smoke_hidden_flag assigns
binding straight into _markerDialog and bypasses the picker entirely.

Twelve checks against the real bundle: a deleted device is offered again, a
deleted plain entity is offered again behind the checkbox, the checkbox itself
is the trap (a device entity is absent with it off, present with it on, and it
starts off for a new marker), a placed binding is not duplicated, and re-adding
replaces the tombstone and leaves the picker.

The twelfth pins the known defect #262 as current behaviour: a device tombstone
still hides its child entities. Fixing it turns the check red and forces it to
be flipped, so the fix cannot pass the coverage by.

smoke-links registers only the pure tombstone helpers. The picker names itself
and is found by direct match; the helpers are not named anywhere in the
scenario. Verified by probe: touching src/devices.ts alone selects this smoke
as a registered link, and without the entry nothing would select it.

Issue: #263
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 15:32:57 +03:00
claude[bot] 9f63163339 docs: review document for #258
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 21s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 26s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 32s
Validate / hacs (push) Skipped
Validate / hassfest (push) Skipped
Validate / frontend (push) Skipped
Validate / provenance (push) Successful in 1m4s
Validate / process-gate (push) Successful in 51s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 44s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Skipped
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Skipped
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Skipped
Validate / backend (push) Skipped
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:46:19 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 61bf537b58 docs: correct wall-key changelog claim
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:40:14 +03:00
claude[bot] aa85a95b32 docs: review document for #258
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:38:37 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin 28eaf86662 fix: stabilize wall keys across storage round-trips
Issue: #258
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 14:21:36 +03:00
claude[bot]andSergey Matyunin 46a83de181 docs: review document for #258
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:18:10 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin b9a5f6c4e4 docs(spec): define stable wall key round-trip
Issue: #258
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:18:10 +03:00
Claude 5e95a28406 test: grade the wall-key invariant by what the product does
Validate / docs (push) Failing after 25s
Validate / process-workflow-sync (push) Successful in 1m13s
Validate / provenance (push) Failing after 1m16s
Validate / process-gate (push) Failing after 1m25s
Validate / changes (push) Successful in 1m9s
Validate / reuse (push) Successful in 58s
Validate / hacs (push) Failing after 17s
Validate / hassfest (push) Failing after 20s
Validate / frontend (push) Successful in 10m20s
Validate / backend (push) Failing after 9m54s
Validate / smoke (1) (push) Failing after 18m2s
Validate / smoke (2) (push) Failing after 17m49s
Validate / smoke (3) (push) Failing after 15m44s
Validate / smoke_done (push) Skipped
Validate / golden (push) Failing after 15m1s
Validate / performance_smoke (push) Failing after 13m49s
The first cut of checkWallKeys compared the stored key against endpoints
snapped to the lattice and called any mismatch a violation. Both halves were
wrong, and measurement says so: wallIntervals reports the query key for the
disputed edge as 0.887500,0.195833@1.5706, i.e. the form built from the
coordinates as stored, and the two owner configurations that differ in exactly
these keys produce byte-identical wall bodies and multi-wall node maps. The
check would have reddened a plan that renders correctly.

Graded now: a drift inside the tolerant fallback's half-pitch reach is an
observation, a key beyond it or one that does not parse as coordinates is a
violation. The threshold is expressed in grid steps with a 1e-3 slack — with a
relative 1e-6 the four identically drifted records of one plan split between
the two classes on their last bits, so the check repeated the very rounding tie
it exists to expose.

visual-matrix leaves KEY_CONTRACT_DEBT: its keys drift inside the reach and now
read as observations. large-house stays — its labels do not parse, and
wallIntervals shows all 80 solid edges resolving to zero thickness (#260).

Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 14:11:22 +03:00
Claude 2970b8091b ci(process): ask the reviewer about the wall key invariant
Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:51:37 +03:00
Claude 7b267fb632 test: check the wall key against the lattice edge
#258 lost two thickness records to a rounding tie: wallKey quantises the
midpoint with Math.round, and a wall of odd step length has its midpoint
exactly on the tie, where the exact node 83/240 and the stored 0.345833333
fall on opposite sides. The #254 invariants pass on that file — their edge
tolerance is 0.004 and the drift is 0.00417, so the check sits on its own
boundary.

checkWallKeys compares strings, and against endpoints snapped to the lattice:
keying from the raw endpoints flags the healthy state and passes the broken
one, which is what the first formulation in #258 got wrong. Measured on the
owner's before/after pair: 0 findings before, exactly the two artefact walls
after.

Two shipped fixtures write keys off the contract (#260); recorded as a number,
so the debt can neither grow nor be silently fixed.

Issue: #259
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 13:50:37 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin 8c7e8bc9d1 chore(release): prepare v1.67.0-beta.4
Issue: #249
Issue: #251
Issue: #252
Issue: #253
Issue: #256
User-Visible: yes
v1.67.0-beta.4
2026-08-23 12:06:29 +03:00
claude[bot] f5ec6718a2 docs: review document for #253
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:59:49 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin ffb609d471 docs: refresh screenshots for wall resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:46:43 +03:00
Sergey Matyunin bfdeb493cb fix: preserve wall thickness across partial resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: yes
2026-08-23 11:42:43 +03:00
claude[bot] 9d6a4e34fd docs: review document for #253
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:30:43 +00:00
Sergey Matyunin d9f7861c05 docs: specify lossless wall resize
Issue: #253
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 11:19:47 +03:00
claude[bot] 6dd59a1925 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
claude[bot] b9e4be3799 docs: review document for #252
Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00
Sergey Matyuninandclaude[bot] 86a0786e2d docs: refresh screenshot fingerprint after rebase
Reviewed: https://github.com/Matysh/houseplan-card/actions/runs/32625765217

Issue: #252
User-Visible: no
2026-08-23 08:06:22 +00:00