AC10 was asserted, never shown. Optimize runs alignAllToGrid and
repairNearAxisRoomWalls, which move nodes by fractions of a centimetre, and
none of П1-П5 carries a margin wider than the grid step in general — so
"obviously true by construction" was not available.
Two units, both counting violations the way the write barrier does (each side
through commitWallSegmentModel first):
- the owner's fixture in legacy storage — the inherited apex is there before
Optimize, and no rule's count grows after;
- the П4 boundary — two rooms exactly 5 cm apart, where snapping could have
pulled a node under the limit, stay clean.
The first test asserts the baseline actually carries a violation, so it cannot
pass by measuring an empty plan; violationsByRule fails loudly if the space or
its catalogue goes missing, for the same reason. Spec revision 7 records the
proof and the other three review answers.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: no
custom_components/houseplan/junction_limits.py repeats П1-П4 for the write
barrier in websocket_api, counting per rule so an inherited violation still
round-trips, and raises JunctionLimitError with the stable code
junction_limit_<rule>.
П5 is deliberately not mirrored — it judges the rendered wall bodies, and a
second mitre/inset pipeline in Python would drift more dangerously than the
rule it guards. Optimize stays outside the check for the same reason migration
and import do: it repairs existing geometry.
test_parity_with_the_frontend_checks feeds identical fixtures to the TS
functions and to this module and demands the same verdict, so the two
implementations cannot silently diverge.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: no
Measured what Resize itself already forbids: a room cannot be squeezed below
30 cm (two 15 cm walls), so П3 and П5 are unreachable through shrinking and
the gate merely fails closed there. П4 IS reachable on a fine grid, so the
smoke drags a real handle on a 2 cm grid: two rooms 10 cm apart, a 6 cm pull
would leave 4 cm between foreign nodes, the wall stops at 6 cm and exactly one
toast names the 5 cm rule.
Spec revision 6 records both the measurement and the two corrections it forces
on AC7a: a dimmed handle cannot express a per-step limit, and the plan is NOT
byte-unchanged — the allowed part of the gesture is a legitimate edit.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: no
П3 measures the WALL, not the catalogue atom: a short filler segment that
compensates a thickness step (owner's fixture, 5 cm = (30-20)/2) is a legal
continuation of a long same-thickness wall, so the rule walks the maximal
collinear run through the shared nodes before judging the length.
Resize stops at the last allowed position and names the broken rule instead
of the generic "geometry cannot be saved"; the Thickness dialog refuses
through its own toast. Both channels are pinned by demo/smoke_junction_limits
plus three mutants (angle threshold, write barrier, degenerate apex bevel).
Issue: #329
User-Visible: yes
Owner report: small serrations remained on the outer edges between the inner
and the outer vertex. Measured on the fixture ring: two ~4 cm steps plus four
micro-vertices at the tip. Their source was the inset contour's two-point
bevel folding into a bow-tie, and the earlier half-plane clip of that fold,
which left a 0.2 cm sliver the boolean union turned into steps. The inset now
ends in ITS own mitre point at a degenerate apex — mirroring the sharp outer
tip — so there is no fold to clip and no sliver to smear: the room ring is
exactly three vertices, every side longer than the half depth. The clip
helper and its cap plumbing are gone. The user-visible wording of this work
already stands in both changelogs from the #329 entry.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: no
Owner correction (chat, 2026-08-27): no flat chamfer at the tip — a plain
sharp apex. Proven by execution on the issue fixture: the outset contour fell
back to a two-point bevel (the 4·h mitre limit against an 87 cm reach) while
the inset contour folded into a bow-tie, and subtracting that fold carved the
V-notches — together they made the trident. Now a degenerate corner (below 15
degrees, inner faces meeting inside both walls) contributes ONE outset point
at the plan's own vertex — no bevel, no metres-long mitre needle — and its
inset is clipped at the convergence line so no fold is subtracted. Plain and
merely sharp pairs keep the full mitre of #310. The write-side limits of
П1-П5 stop new plans from creating such corners at all.
Issue: #329
User-Visible: yes
CODE-REVIEW-316-r1 H1: the §3.3 degraded pool picked an angle-compatible wall
at ANY distance, but the backend geometry-match invariant («wall opening
geometry must match its host») requires the host to agree with the opening's
own x/y — the migrated document was rejected by CONFIG_SCHEMA and the write
wedged again on the schema layer. The pool is removed from both migrations
(TS and the Python mirror): without an in-place eligible carrier the opening
goes straight to the unhosted degraded state, exactly the alternative the
spec's «assumed freely changeable» section reserved; the spec is revision 6.
New tests replay the reviewer's reproduction on both sides, and the frontend
test is proven able to fail by restoring the pool (executed red).
CODE-REVIEW-316-r2 M2: the schema-level host check is shared with #132
partition openings, so its unhosted relaxation is now pinned by a regression
test — a stale writer that keeps a partition-hosted opening but silently
drops its host is still rejected by validate_partition_opening_hosts.
Issue: #316
User-Visible: no
Код честно держал адресный латеральный трим с самого решения №5, дока после
M1 описывала его верно — расходился только текст ТЗ, писавший «демонтирован
целиком». §4.5, §8.2 и AC6 приведены к фактическому контракту.
Issue: #302
User-Visible: no
Владелец, осмотрев первые эталоны сета, отменил дневное решение о сохранении
фаски: `junction-y-60-equal50` показывал вырез, `junction-acute30-mixed` —
торчащие углы. По визуальному сравнению трёх вариантов принято: узлы
смыкаются полным mitre, как обычное пересечение стен на чертеже.
Итоговое правило веера (одно на все случаи):
- mitre принимается, когда он В СЕКТОРЕ пары (вперёд по лучам для обычной
пары, назад — для рефлексной: наружный угол между крайними лучами, где и
жил вырез Y-60), в пределах классического `MITRE_LIMIT` и не дальше конца
толстого саппорта (#271);
- рефлекс без валидного mitre замыкается плоской хордой между гранями;
- обычная пара без mitre — локальный бевел: ход по граням ограничен толстым
саппортом, лимитом и двойной толщиной пары, чтобы хорда осталась деталью
угла. Гигантские бевел-«бабочки» и mitre вне сектора — две реальные ошибки
промежуточных версий, обе пойманы на сценах сета до пуша.
Слой `bevelMultiWallBody` сохранён только как АДРЕСНЫЙ латеральный трим для
узлов с вырожденно-коротким толстым саппортом (#271); все прочие узлы — чисто
аддитивные, следы трима на них исчезли. `bevelMultiWallPaper` из бумаги
удалён. Обе записи CHANGELOG приведены к финальному контракту.
Тесты: юниты §302 усилены; площадь фикстуры #197 +0.6 юнита²; мутанты
переякорены, краснота каждого проверена исполнением.
Issue: #302
User-Visible: yes
