Commit Graph
3037 Commits
Author SHA1 Message Date
claude[bot] f4625dd4fb docs: review document for #524
Issue: #524
User-Visible: no
2026-09-11 05:04:43 +00:00
claude[bot] 8ba87b3ff7 docs: review document for #525
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 1m47s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 2m51s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 1m23s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 1m44s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 2m14s
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 4m45s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 8m4s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Issue: #525
User-Visible: no
2026-09-11 02:00:05 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] ab296302d1 test: register the space-switch witness for the two renderers (#525)
`smoke-select` answered НЕОПРЕДЕЛЁННОСТЬ on this diff: the smoke does not
name `_renderDevice` or `_renderOpenings` anywhere — it switches spaces the
ordinary way and reads running transitions off the nodes those renderers
produced. That is exactly the case `scripts/smoke-links.mjs` exists for, and
without the record the next edit to either renderer selects no witness at all.

Issue: #525
User-Visible: no
2026-09-11 01:42:46 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 8d5bade656 docs: refresh the screenshot source fingerprint (#525)
The fix touches `src/houseplan-card.ts` and `src/styles/plan.styles.ts`, and
the documentation fingerprint covers the whole `src/**` corpus.

Accepted with `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` (#512): all 11 frames were
re-captured locally and matched the committed ones byte for byte, so only the
fingerprint moves, `7a90ca04 → cd8e9598`. No PNG changes. Environment: Linux,
Chromium 152 — the canon platform of #455.

Issue: #525
User-Visible: no
2026-09-11 01:42:46 +00:00
Claudeandclaude[bot] 9edef041a9 fix: openings and markers keep their identity across a space switch (#525)
Lit reuses list nodes by position. The opening list and the device markers had
no keys, so on a space switch the leaf that held a slot kept its DOM node and
only changed values — and `.op-leaf` (transform) and `.op-arc`
(stroke-dashoffset) carry a 0.6 s transition, so the browser animated a door
that never moved: the new floor's leaf drove in from the previous floor's
opening angle. Measured on two spaces with a door in the same place and
opposite contact states: the node is reused, transform goes
`rotate(-90deg) → rotate(0deg)`, dash offset `0 → 125.66`, both transitions
`running`. The marker shell adds two more with its `box-shadow`.

Both lists are now rendered through `repeat(…, (item) => item.id, …)`, the
same lesson `glow-scene.ts` already learned for the Glow spots. The trap is
written where it starts — above the two transitions in `plan.styles.ts` —
because that is the file someone edits when adding the next animated property.
`houseplan-card.ts` is at its line ceiling, and the note would have cost the
budget a dozen lines for nothing: the swap itself is line-for-line.

The witness walks the shadow tree per element. `document.getAnimations()` is
empty here EVEN ON THE BROKEN CODE — the card lives in a shadow root and the
document-level call does not reach into it, and the issue proposed exactly
that call. The smoke also builds its own fixture: the demo home has no
openings at all, so two doors in two spaces are prepared in the smoke, and it
asserts the other half of the contract as well — a real contact change inside
one space still animates the leaf.

On `origin/dev` the smoke fails on five facts, naming the offenders:
`op-arc:stroke-dashoffset`, `op-leaf:transform`, `device-shell-frame:box-shadow`
twice. Mutants `openings-rendered-without-keys` and
`device-markers-rendered-without-keys` put each `map` back.

Perf, 7 samples against `19e421b3`: spaceSwitchMs 524.8 (limit 769.35, base
512.9), switchCycleMs 1293.9 (1696.28, 1256.5), firstStableRenderMs 2533.8
(3000, 2529.2), modelReadyMs 732.7 (944.97, 726.9), longTask.maxSingleMs 663
(910, 660) — `benchmark:compare` green in full.

The initial View graph grows 241 B gzip: `repeat` enters it for the first
time. The #438 ceiling is recentred 300 400 → 300 700 with the usual dated
note; measured 300 059 B keeps 641 B above and 1 359 B below the band. The
301 066 B budget is untouched, but only 366 B now separate the ceiling from
it — the #367 headroom debt has stopped being theoretical.

Issue: #525
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-11 01:42:46 +00:00
claude[bot] 95175a7616 docs: review document for #525
Issue: #525
User-Visible: no
2026-09-11 01:20:43 +00:00
Claude 19e421b3cf Refresh the v1.74.0-beta.1 candidate on the merged line
The candidate was assembled before #520 and #521 landed. Version fields are
already at 1.74.0-beta.1 in all seven sources and the bundles rebuild
byte-identical, so this commit only moves what the beta says about itself:
the #521 changelog entry leaves Unreleased for the beta.1 section in both
languages, the release notes gain its bullet on both sides (four and four,
the grouped small-fixes bullet stays last), and STATUS records the two
issues merged since — the alignment guides that follow the gesture again
(#521, a regression shipped in v1.72.0 and v1.73.0) and the cold-start
adoption fix behind it (#520, internal).

No product change: `npm run build` plus `bundle-sync` leave `dist/**` and
the two mirrored trees untouched, `node scripts/release-contract.mjs
v1.74.0-beta.1` is green on all seven version sources, `npm test` 2515/0.

The `Release:` trailer is what asks CI for the heavy gates — smokes, golden
and the full performance comparison — on this exact SHA (#479).

Issue: #521
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.74.0-beta.1
v1.74.0-beta.1
2026-09-10 23:59:13 +03:00
claude[bot] 3f3583ac58 docs: review document for #521
Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 20:48:53 +00:00
Claude 9a3af808d9 fix: hide the settled guides copy for the whole gesture, and prove it (#521)
Code review r1 was right that AC5's evidence was empty: the smoke never
forced a settled render during a gesture, so the settled copy of
`.hp-editor-only-layer` was empty at every point it looked, and
`groups() === 1` held whether the copy was hidden or not.

Measuring the case the reviewer named turned up more than a weak assertion.
Ownership of the layer alternates on its own — every settled render ends in
`updated()` → `_commitLiveEditor()`, which empties the live root — so a
settled render mid-gesture takes the guides back and draws them itself, from
the same live `_alignPoint`. That much needs no suppression. But the copy it
leaves behind stays in the settled scene, and the NEXT live paint adds a
second one: measured two `.alignline` on one alignment, the settled one a
grid step behind the marker. So the suppression stays, and now it stays with
a witness.

The smoke counts what is visible, not what is in the DOM: the hidden copy is
still a node, and counting nodes is how this check could have looked green
while showing the user two lines. Its device scenario now drives the whole
handover — force an unrelated settled render mid-drag (`_hdrH`, the same
header-height observer that masked the defect in the S2 measurements), assert
the render actually happened, that the layer went back to the settled scene
with the live point on it, and that one real move later the live painter owns
it again — exactly one visible guide at every step.

Mutant `live-editor-keeps-the-settled-guides-visible` puts the suppression
back under the plan branch, as it was before this issue, and the smoke goes
red on `nextMoveTakesTheLayerBack`.

Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 23:25:46 +03:00
claude[bot] deebcfb095 docs: review document for #521
Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 20:05:44 +00:00
Claude 0715321fdc docs: refresh the screenshot source fingerprint (#521)
The fix touches `src/live-editor.ts` and `src/houseplan-card.ts`, and the
documentation fingerprint covers the whole `src/**` corpus, so `check-docs`
called the committed screenshot index stale — the same step #520 needed.

Accepted with `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` (#512): all 11 frames were
re-captured locally and matched the committed ones byte for byte, so only the
fingerprint moves, `c615d580 → 7a90ca04`. No PNG changes, nothing here needs
the owner's visual acceptance. Environment: Linux, Chromium 152 — the canon
platform of #455.

Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 22:24:27 +03:00
Claude 53585b451b fix: alignment guides follow the live gesture again (#521)
#451 moved every editor gesture onto the live painter, and the guides stayed
behind in the settled scene. While a gesture runs, the settled scene is not
re-rendered at all, so the guides did not follow the marker in the device
editor, the shape in the backdrop editor, or the cursor while a contour is
drawn in the plan editor. Measured with real pointer events on the demo stand
against `origin/dev`, after waiting for the editor chrome to settle: three
gestures, each exactly on another object's axis, 0 settled render cycles,
`.alignline` 0 and no `.alignguides` group in all three.

The report called it two breaks. It is one — the layer — plus one thing that
would have broken the repair: `_alignPoint` read `_pos`, which during a live
gesture answers from the snapshot of the last settled render. Over one drag:
live 254.17 → 220.83 while `_pos` stayed at 254.17, eight grid steps behind,
so a restored layer would have drawn the guide at the marker's old place.

The live template now paints the guides in all three modes (the device editor
had no template at all — `paintDevice` only moves the marker element), and
`_alignPoint` takes the live position. The settled copy of
`.hp-editor-only-layer` is made transparent for the duration of any editor
gesture, not only in plan mode: two guides, one of them stale, is what the
user would otherwise see when an unrelated settled render lands mid-gesture.
`_renderAlignGuides` on the card becomes soft — a gesture that starts while
the editor runtime is still loading must cost nothing, and an exception inside
a `requestAnimationFrame` paint would take the whole gesture with it.

The witness is rewritten around the defect that hid this for two stable
releases: the old smoke assigned `_deviceDrag`/`_decorDraft` wholesale, and an
assignment with `oldValue == null` does not route to the live path — it
verified a state a real gesture never reaches. Every scenario now drives real
`PointerEvent`s, waits for silence first (the `_hdrH` settling window right
after entering a mode hands out settled frames that make even the broken code
draw a guide), and asserts zero settled cycles during the movements plus
exactly one `.alignguides` group. #400's exclusion is checked without touching
the drag state: the dragged marker must simply be absent from the candidates.
On `origin/dev` the smoke fails on nine of its facts; a witness that stays
green before the fix was the actual bug here.

Mutants: `live-editor-devices-drops-align-guides`,
`live-editor-decor-drops-align-guides`, `live-editor-plan-drops-align-guides`,
`align-point-reads-frozen-snapshot` — one per AC, all guarded by the smoke.
`test/smoke-harness-contract.test.mjs` pins that the smoke cannot go back to
fabricating gesture state.

Issue: #521
User-Visible: yes
2026-09-10 22:20:18 +03:00
claude[bot] fa7ac02c0f docs: review document for #521
Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 19:05:32 +00:00
claude[bot] 548e7a8563 docs: review document for #521
Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 18:57:55 +00:00
claude[bot] 9592092b8e docs: review document for #521
Issue: #521
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 18:49:42 +00:00
claude[bot] c50bc725c8 docs: review document for #522
Issue: #522
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 18:40:54 +00:00
claude[bot] b2346eaac3 docs: review document for #520
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Successful in 2m16s
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 1m55s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 52s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Skipped
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 18:26:40 +00:00
Claude a325294d7a docs: refresh the screenshot source fingerprint (#520)
The fix touches `src/houseplan-card.ts` and `src/config-adoption.ts`, and the
documentation fingerprint is computed over the whole `src/**` corpus, so
`check-docs` called the committed screenshot index stale — the Medium of code
review r2.

Accepted through `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` (#512): all 11 frames
were re-captured locally and compared byte-for-byte with the committed ones —
«Все 11 кадров попиксельно совпали с закоммиченными». Only the fingerprint
moves, `ccbbfb4e → c615d580`; not a single PNG changes, so nothing here needs
the owner's visual acceptance. Environment: Linux, Chromium 152 (the canon
platform of #455; capture refuses elsewhere).

`node scripts/check-docs.mjs` — «Documentation checks passed (7 files, 12
external links)».

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 21:15:42 +03:00
claude[bot] 3066fec17e docs: review document for #520
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 17:47:45 +00:00
Claude 462b56453c fix: the authoritative adoption keeps its own task (#520)
The r1 diagnosis was wrong, and the measurement in the code review proved
it: removing the two declarations from `static properties` left the cold
start at 19 update cycles, 4 model builds and 4 config epochs, exactly the
numbers of the bug. Lit's forced first-update change does mark `_serverCfg`
changed, but at that moment the body and `_cfgEpochPreservedConfig` are both
null, `preserveGeometry` is true and the epoch does not move. The comment
above `static properties` now says that; the declaration still stays out,
because two owners of one reactivity is what #500 removed.

The real cause is the `await`. Before #500 everything from
`_adoptStructuralResponses` to the end of the load ran in one task: the
adopted bodies, `_adoptInitialSpace`, the viewport restore, `_loadOk`, and
the device seeding — whose `_syncNewDevices`/`_seedHiddenDevices` write the
config back — all landed in a single Lit update. #500 made the adoption an
async sequence, so the caller resumes one microtask later, after Lit has
already painted the adopted config; the seeding writes then arrive as a
second config epoch, a second model build and a second paint of a 60-room
house.

`GatedAdoptionInput` gains `afterAdopt`, the mirror of `beforeAdopt`: it
runs synchronously at the end of the sequence, before the promise resolves.
`_loadFromServer` moves the viewport restore, `_loadOk` and the device
rebuild into it — `_syncNewDevices` refuses to write before `_loadOk`, so
the order inside the hook matters — and the load tail now rebuilds devices
only when nothing was adopted. `_reloadConfigOnly` takes the same route.

Measured with the project's own runner, 7 samples per profile, base
`a44fbd37` against this tree (Chromium 152, sandbox):

  interaction  modelReadyMs 761.3 ≤ 950.56 (base 731.2)
               firstStableRenderMs 2567.2 ≤ 3000 (base 2542.7)
               longTask.maxSingleMs 690 ≤ 921 · cache.entries.cleanFloor 100
  isometric    modelReadyMs 1252.9 ≤ 1499.76 (base 1249.8)
               firstStableRenderMs 1378 ≤ 1610.16 (base 1341.8)

Boot diagnostics on both trees: 18 update cycles, 3 model builds, 3 config
epochs, with the same epoch trace — the candidate is no longer
distinguishable from the base.

Witnesses. `config-adoption.test.mjs` queues a microtask at the start of
the adoption and pins that `afterAdopt` runs before it — the probe fails the
moment the hook crosses an await; `config-adoption-ownership.test.mjs` pins
the wiring in the card and the hook's place in the sequence. Mutants
`adoption-tail-defers-caller-hook` (defers the hook by one microtask) and
`authoritative-load-seeds-devices-after-the-await` (drops the rebuild from
the hook) redden them.

The initial View graph grows 40 B gzip, so the #438 ceiling is recentred
300 300 → 300 400 with the usual dated note; measured 299 812 B keeps 588 B
above and 1 412 B below the band. The overall 301 066 B budget and the #367
headroom debt are untouched.

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 20:12:13 +03:00
claude[bot] 49a02637ca docs: review document for #520
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 16:27:39 +00:00
Claude a625871538 test: a mutant for the only surviving wake-up of a replaced config body (#520)
With the bodies no longer declared as Lit properties, `onBodyReplaced` is the
single path that turns a replaced config reference into an update — AC2 of
this issue rests on it, and until now only a hand-run mutation stood behind
that column. The mutant drops the notification from `setConfig`; the existing
unit in `test/config-adoption.test.mjs` reddens on it.

Verified: `node scripts/mutation-gate.mjs --id=adoption-notifies-no-host-on-config-replacement`
— «поймано 1 из 1».

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 19:03:21 +03:00
Claude e181b08f2b fix: the adoption bodies are no longer declared Lit properties (#520)
#500 gave `_serverCfg` and `_layout` prototype accessors but left them in
`static properties`. Lit marks such a property `wrapped` and, on the FIRST
update, force-writes it into `changedProperties` with an `undefined` old
value even though nobody assigned anything (`reactive-element.js:249-252`
and `:880-886`). `willUpdate` reads that as a config replacement, raises
`_cfgEpoch`, the memoized model key changes, and a 60-room house builds and
paints its model a second time: measured 19 update cycles, 4 builds and 4
epochs against 18 / 3 / 3 before #500, worth ~550 ms of `modelReadyMs` and
the same on `firstStableRenderMs` (3355 against a 3000 ceiling).

The declaration goes; the bodies stay reactive through the owner —
`_adoption` → `onBodyReplaced` → `requestUpdate(field, previous)` — which
needs no declaration: `getPropertyOptions` falls back to the default and
`changed.has('_serverCfg')` works as before. `noAccessor: true` would not
help, `wrapped` is set before that flag is read. The trap is written above
`static properties`, where someone would put the declaration back.

`cache.entries.cleanFloor` returns to 100 in both interaction budgets: the
120 entries were the extra epoch re-keying the per-room cache, not a
property of the design — the reasoning in 914e8402 was wrong.

Witness: test/config-adoption-ownership.test.mjs pins that neither body is
declared; the mutant `adoption-bodies-declared-reactive` puts the
declaration back and reddens it.

The boot diagnostics of the previous three commits touch four private
members, so they are declared in the performance contract: `_buildModel` and
`_cfgEpoch` outright (both exist in every supported comparison base), and the
adoption entry point as a current/legacy pair — #500 turned the private
`_adoptStructuralResponses` into the public `_adoptAuthoritative`, and an
undeclared rename would have the counter report zero adoptions instead of
failing.

The same commits carried a `node_modules` symlink: `.gitignore` had the
pattern with a trailing slash, which does not cover a symbolic link, and
`git add -A` in a sandbox worktree committed it. The link is removed and the
pattern loses the slash; a mutant run on this branch failed with `EEXIST` on
it.

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 18:58:24 +03:00
claude[bot] 50fa7f9be2 docs: review document for #520
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 15:38:40 +00:00
claude[bot] b49721a0bd docs: review document for #520
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 15:30:21 +00:00
claude[bot] ad2f9afd2b docs: review document for #520
Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 15:20:07 +00:00
Claude 27ea23c1ec test(perf): trace every config-epoch bump with the frame that made it (#520)
The comparison already names the mechanism: base does 18 update cycles, 3
model builds and ends at epoch 3, the candidate does 19, 4 and epoch 4, and
the extra build is the whole ~550 ms. What is still missing is the caller.
The diagnostic now installs an instance-level setter over `_cfgEpoch` and
records `from->to` with the top stack frames, so the extra bump names itself.

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 17:57:27 +03:00
Claude 3d43980568 test(perf): the boot diagnostics travel out of the page into the run log (#520)
The first attempt printed them with console.log inside page.evaluate, and
nothing forwards the page console to Node — the numbers went nowhere. The
sample now returns `bootDiag`, the runner prints it and strips it before the
row is recorded, so the budgeted record keeps its shape.

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 17:47:18 +03:00
Claude 37ef970dfc test(perf): count update cycles, model builds and adoptions during boot (#520)
The full comparison says model readiness grew by ~500 ms inside #500 and
that the growth sits in one long task, but neither contentFingerprint
(2.8 ms on this fixture) nor spaceModels (0.1 ms) can account for it. The
benchmark now prints, per sample, how many Lit update cycles ran before the
first stable frame, how long they took together, how many models were built,
how many adoptions happened and the config epoch. Diagnostics only: printed
to the log, never part of the budgeted record, and the same harness runs
against the comparison bundle, so candidate and base are counted alike.

Issue: #520
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 17:38:36 +03:00
Claude 914e84028d perf: the clean-floor cache holds one entry per room per config epoch (#509)
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 52s
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m32s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Failing after 43s
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Failing after 41s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m11s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 4m28s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 4m36s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 4m43s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 4m38s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 3m58s
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Failing after 4m7s
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Failing after 5m49s
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Failing after 8m2s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
The pre-release perf gate of the v1.74.0-beta.1 candidate reported
cache.entries.cleanFloor 120 against a ceiling of 100 (run 34480302982,
large-house-interaction-v1). The ceiling was calibrated when only the visible
space populated `_cleanFloorCache`; since #509 the summary panel computes the
clean-floor total in per-room slices through the same cache, so the sixty
fixture rooms are cached under both config epochs the interaction profile
creates — 60 × 2 = 120, exactly what the run measured.

The ceiling moves to 180 in the smoke and in the full interaction profile:
one entry per room per epoch with room for a third epoch, far below the LRU
cap of 600 and far below anything a per-frame or per-marker regression would
produce. The leak detector is untouched: cacheGrowth.cleanFloor stays 0.

Issue: #509
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.74.0-beta.1
2026-09-10 16:29:31 +03:00
Claude d5575f6393 Prepare v1.74.0-beta.1
Version fields and the generated bundles move to 1.74.0-beta.1 and open the
line after the stable v1.73.0. The changelog entries of #509 and #508 leave
Unreleased for the beta.1 section; release notes and STATUS describe them and
name the internal work of this beta. No product change beyond what is already
reviewed and merged.

Issue: #509
Issue: #508
User-Visible: no
Release: v1.74.0-beta.1
2026-09-10 16:01:59 +03:00
Claude 1950df608f docs: refresh the screenshots fingerprint before the v1.74.0-beta.1 candidate
The #500 adoption work changed src/** without touching any of the eleven
documented frames. The owner re-captured them in WSL — the canonical Linux
environment, because DirectWrite on native Windows never reproduces an
accepted frame — and `npm run docs:accept -- --identical` (#512) found zero
differing pixels, so only the source fingerprint moves:
48f770cf → ccbbfb4e. Frame bytes, their hashes and the capture-script guard
stay exactly as accepted.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 16:01:58 +03:00
claude[bot] 94ea4694f4 docs: review document for #500
Проверка (CI) / Классификация изменённых файлов (push) Successful in 47s
Проверка (CI) / HACS: валидация репозитория (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Hassfest: манифест интеграции (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (1/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (2/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (3/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (4/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (5/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Мутанты по диффу (6/6): затронутые свидетели краснеют (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Фронтенд: типы, юниты, мутанты, синхрон бандла (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Предполётные проверки: документация, провенанс, процесс (push) Failing after 1m24s
Проверка (CI) / Переиспользование: это дерево уже проверено (push) Successful in 1m14s
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 1 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 2 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки в браузере (шард 3 из 3) (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Смоки: все шарды зелёные (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Golden-кадры против принятых эталонов (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Перф-смок: бюджет времени кадра (push) Skipped
Проверка (CI) / Бэкенд: pytest в Home Assistant (push) Skipped
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 12:32:21 +00:00
Codex be6d57e96f test(adoption): the post-write smoke resets its own pending writes
Review r2 M1. The smoke's reset() left the previous scenario's debounced
config/layout write pending; _deleteSpace flushes whatever is pending
before it writes, the fake socket answers without a rev, and the
documented rev+1 fallback then moved the revision on a body from another
scenario. The refused branch looked as if it had adopted:
onboardingDeleteRefusedAdoptsNothing was red on every run. The scenarios
are supposed to be independent, so reset() now cancels both debounced
writers, as smoke_danger_confirmation already does.

37/37 green, three runs in a row; with the cancel removed the same
single check goes red again.

The refused-tail fix from r1 had no witness in CI at all: no mutant
named this smoke as its guard, so the review gate never ran it and a red
witness survived a whole round. A witness that never runs is not a
witness, so the early return in _undoPlanOptimization now has a mutant
that names the smoke.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 15:16:12 +03:00
claude[bot] 5acf04fa33 docs: review document for #500
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 12:08:21 +00:00
claude[bot] 93c6c7551b fix(adoption): post-write callers skip their tail on a refused gate (#500 r1 M1)
`space/delete` (both runtimes), Optimize Undo and Import apply now treat
`asset-wait` like every reload path: nothing was adopted, so no toast, no
space switch, no history/undo reset — the dialog is released and the
scheduled reload owns the rest. Unit and smoke cover the refused branch for
all four paths; the spec's reactivity risk row states the real mechanism.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] bac63dbcaf docs: review document for #500
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 31c2583e46 fix(adoption): a replaced body stays a reactive host event (#500)
`willUpdate` keys the geometry epoch and render-lifecycle invalidation on
`changed.has('_serverCfg')`. Before #500 every body replacement went through
Lit's accessor and produced that event; the owner wrote its field directly
and the epoch stopped moving on adoption, staging and rollback — the safe
Resize smoke then measured against a stale model (Validate on c360bcc9).
`MutableConfigAdoption` now reports each replaced reference through
`onBodyReplaced`, which the card wires to `requestUpdate(field, previous)`;
echoes and identity-only changes stay silent, exactly as an unchanged
reference never fired the accessor.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 2f41c0b29e test(adoption): ownership lint, post-write smoke, harness seam and docs (#500)
`test/config-adoption-ownership.test.mjs` pins identity writes to the owner
and ratchets body staging (AC1/AC2). `demo/smoke_post_write_adoption.mjs`
drives space/delete (both runtimes), Optimize Undo and Import apply with a
concurrent backdrop change between the write and the re-read (AC4). Smokes
that seed revisions from outside the card keep working through the
`seedIdentity` harness seam behind the card's delegate setters. The initial
View ceiling is re-centred with the measured fact; ARCHITECTURE.md gets the
boundary paragraph.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] a3e7ac1fc6 test(adoption): revision guard witness for optimistic rollback (#500 AC6)
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 7194fb2df0 feat(adoption): one owner for config/layout identity and the adoption sequence
`src/config-adoption.ts` owns config/layout with revision and fingerprint;
the host keeps `_serverCfg`/`_cfgRev`/`_layout`/`_layoutRev` as delegates.
All seven authoritative adoptions go through `adoptAuthoritativeGated`
(backdrop readiness → continuity → adopt → profile tail); the post-write
paths (space/delete ×2, optimize_undo, import/apply) gain the gate and take
revisions from the re-read bodies. `rollbackOptimistic` moves to the owner;
plan-optimize, space copy and the vacuum writers stop assigning identity.

Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] a44fbd373d docs: review document for #500
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] c21e9de32b docs(spec): #500 r3 — post-write profile keeps caller tails untouched
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 9bbba66d11 docs: review document for #500
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] b4a2d5b952 docs(spec): #500 r2 — seven adoption callers, two profiles, vacuum writers
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] b6a66a1bac docs: review document for #500
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
claude[bot] 88eb382403 docs(spec): #500 one ownership boundary for config adoption
Issue: #500
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 11:41:16 +00:00
Codex f6eac1d971 docs: the review gate charges a round only for what the round changed
Issue: #518
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 14:31:06 +03:00
Codex 67c780a742 test: the review gate's own job names follow the six shards
Issue: #518
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 14:20:34 +03:00
Codex 2783ceff94 perf(ci): judge a witness by its anchor's neighbourhood, not the whole file
The review gate re-ran almost every selected witness on every round even
when the executor's fix was twelve lines: the ledger fingerprint and the
diff selection both worked on whole files, and the card hosts are
thirteen thousand lines each. On #500 those twelve lines in
houseplan-editor-runtime.ts pulled 53 of the 75 witnesses the third
round ran, and the gate cost 140 job-minutes and an hour of the
reviewer's wall clock across three rounds.

The patch side is now judged by the anchor's neighbourhood — the anchor
lines plus ANCHOR_RADIUS_LINES on each side — in both the ledger
fingerprint and the diff selection, which now reads hunk ranges from
git diff --unified=0. The guard side keeps whole-file granularity: a
guard has no anchor and changes as a whole. An anchor that is not found
exactly once falls back to the whole file, and so does a file whose
hunks were not read: not knowing is not proof. Same class of
approximation as the existing diff selection, with the nightly full
gate (#513) as the floor.

Two more cuts to the wall clock of a review round. The shard plan is now
computed before the environment is installed — restore the ledger,
select, split, and only then pay for npm ci, Python and Chromium; the
job still runs, so the review gate's proof (#510) is unaffected. And the
matrix goes from three shards to six: the same job-minutes, half the
wall time.

On the #500 round the selection drops 60 → 7. Four witnesses guard the
new logic, including the two unsafe defaults (ambiguous anchor, missing
hunks).

Issue: #518
User-Visible: no
2026-09-10 14:17:36 +03:00