**High-1.** Комнаты хранятся в тех же координатах, что и перегородки:
`roomPoly` отдаёт сырой полигон конфига. Обе обвязки делили его на `NORM_W`
ещё раз, комната уезжала в область ~0.0001, и `junctionAt` не находил ни
одного совпадения. Узел на T-стыке к середине стены комнаты — тот самый
случай, ради которого ТЗ прошло два раунда ревью, — молча исчезал.
Воспроизведено вызовом `optimizePlans`: `partitionsMerged === 1` там, где
ожидается 0.
**High-2.** Завершаемая цепочка к моменту слияния ещё лежит в `room_drafts`:
каждый клик персистит её через `_persistActiveDraftSegment`, а удаляется
черновик строкой ниже вызова слияния. Собственные концы цепочки считались
чужим примыканием, и стык с существующей стеной не срастался. Активный
черновик теперь исключается — ровно так же, как это делает
`plan-snap-overlay` (`activeDraftId`).
Дыры в тестах, которые это пропустили, закрыты по существу, а не заплаткой:
- `demo/smoke_wall_chain_merge.mjs` рисует продолжение реальными кликами через
`_markupClick`, а не присваиванием `_path`, — то есть исполняет тот путь, на
котором дефект и жил. Клики задаются в координатах плана и переводятся через
живой view box, иначе смок целится мимо только что нарисованной стены.
- `test/plan-optimizer.test.mjs` получил комнату с примыканием к середине
стороны: юниты модуля этого не ловили, потому что передают полигон уже в
согласованном масштабе, минуя обвязку.
- Мутанты `partition-merge-rescales-rooms` и `chain-merge-sees-own-draft`
сторожат оба места: проверены применением патча, 1 и 2 падения.
Issue: #229
User-Visible: no
Рисование прямой стены в несколько кликов оставляло по записи на каждый
отрезок. Швы невидимы, пока их не тронешь: выделение хватает кусок,
перетаскивание ломает стену пополам, толщина задаётся пофрагментно. У стен
комнат этого давно нет — `normalizeWallIntervals` схлопывает каждый сплошной
участок одной толщины. Независимые перегородки жили по другому правилу.
Новый чистый модуль `src/wall-merge.ts` даёт им то же правило:
- `mergeCollinearPartitions` сращивает соседей одинаковой толщины и
направления до неподвижной точки, но только там, где узел никому не нужен.
Узел остаётся, если в него приходит третья перегородка, стена комнаты
(стороной, а не только вершиной), колонна или конец сохранённого черновика.
- Направление выжившей записи канонизируется лексикографически: иначе одна и
та же физическая стена выходила то a→b, то b→a в зависимости от порядка
входа, и каждый host.t вдоль неё переворачивался вместе с ней.
- `applyOpeningMoves` переносит проёмы на выжившую запись: и авторитетный
`host`, и legacy-проекцию `x/y/angle`, которую рисует старый читатель
конфига (docs/CONFIG-COMPATIBILITY.md, #132). Проекция здесь не кэш —
канонизация направления разворачивает угол на 180°.
Рисование сращивает только свою цепочку и то, чего она коснулась (§8.6 ТЗ):
молча править чужие швы в стороне оно не вправе — для этого есть
«Оптимизировать планы» с предпросмотром, отчётом и отменой. Оптимизация
проходит по всему пространству без seed-ограничения и отдельной строкой
сообщает, сколько записей исчезло.
Issue: #229
User-Visible: yes
Review CODE-REVIEW-220-r2/r3, F1.
The M1 fix installs window listeners for the length of the gesture, and
disconnectedCallback — which takes down everything else, down to the other
local gesture — did not take those down. Losing the card mid-drag (Lovelace
rebuilding its tree, the user leaving the view with the button still down)
left them alive: the closure holds the instance and its config, and the next
pointerup anywhere on the page would have an invisible card write its order.
The smoke now holds a tab, removes the card, and checks that the release it
should no longer hear changes nothing. Registered as a mutant too.
Issue: #220
User-Visible: no
Review CODE-REVIEW-220-r1.
H1: markersNeedingPlacement decided who depends on the order by reading
marker.area alone, while resolveExplicitMarkerPlacement reads
`marker.area || <area of the HA device>`. The ordinary marker — bind an HA
device, store neither field — is anchored by the registry and never depended
on the order, yet it was being written a space it never asked for. Dormant
today, and the day that HA area changes it moves the marker to whatever space
used to be first. The resolver now asks for the area actually in force.
M1: a mouse released past the panel left the gesture stuck, swallowing the
next click. Pointer capture is the usual answer and is now taken, but it is
not a guarantee — the browser grants it only for a live pointer. The window
listener is what actually closes the gesture.
M2: the fifth mutant from the spec is registered, plus a sixth for the stuck
drag above.
Writing the smoke for M1 turned up why the first attempt passed against
broken code: synthetic PointerEvents default to composed:false and never
leave the shadow root, so nothing outside the panel could ever hear them.
Real pointer events are composed; the smoke now says so.
Issue: #220
User-Visible: no
The order of config.spaces used to be whatever order the spaces were created
in, and there was no way back other than deleting a space and drawing it
again.
The gesture is deliberately narrow — mouse, editors only. The same tabs are
the primary way to switch spaces in View, where touch is first class, so a
drag there would compete with the tap that switches. Recorded in the spec as
"Touch editor: not exposed".
The part that needed care is not the drag. Position in the array feeds three
things: the marker placement fallback, the swipe neighbour and a positional
`floor`. So the write that stores the new order also writes down the
placement that used to depend on it: a marker with neither an explicit space
nor an area that names one gets the space it has right now. Both changes go in
one save; splitting them would leave a window in which markers move on their
own. The positional `floor` cannot be fixed from here, so the card says so
once.
Issue: #220
User-Visible: yes
The pipeline punished what it prescribed: after a failed merge it tells the
author to rebase and restore S7-code-review, and that attempt finished the
budget. On #225 (light track, limit 2) the sequence yellow, green, rebase
produced review-4 on a task whose code review was green and whose CI was
green, with no product change after the verdict — the owner had to
arbitrate work that was already accepted.
A cycle under section 4 is a verdict with blocking findings followed by a
return to the author, so only yellow and red verdicts spend the budget now.
A green verdict returned nothing and consumes nothing, which also removes
any need to mark rebase re-runs specially.
Attempts and cycles are now separate quantities. The attempt number keeps
naming the document, because two runs sharing a number would overwrite each
other's review artefact, while the limit compares blocking cycles only. The
exhaustion comment lists the verdicts it counted, and the guard no longer
strips review-4 — it reports the recount and leaves the decision with the
owner.
Rule 7 of the process gate follows: its document threshold rises above the
cycle limit, because legitimate attempts can exceed cycles and a threshold
equal to the limit would refuse the very rebase the pipeline demands.
Issue: #227
User-Visible: no
Review CODE-REVIEW-225-r1.
M1: urlsplit(url).path was trusted even when the url carried a scheme or an
authority, so "https://evil.example/houseplan_files/files/m1/doc.pdf"
resolved onto a local file while _looks_internal kept calling it external —
the mirror image of the inconsistency this resolver exists to prevent. Only a
same-document reference is resolved by its path now.
M2: the three mutants the spec described are registered in
scripts/mutation-gate.mjs instead of living as a one-off manual run. The
traversal entry drops both structural checks at once on purpose: taken one at
a time the defence is layered (sanitize_marker_id turns ".." into "misc") and
the mutant would be equivalent — established by running it.
Issue: #225
User-Visible: no
Every push to dev paid for the full browser trio and the backend suite,
including commits that touch only documentation, workflows or process
scripts — the bundle and the harness were byte-identical, so the runs
proved nothing new. On 2026-08-19 alone that was roughly six pushes at
about seven minutes each.
The reuse key per heavy job is sourceFingerprint (src, demo fixtures,
golden scenarios, build manifests) plus that job's own harness: smoke
takes demo/smoke_*.mjs, golden takes demo/golden/** including baselines,
performance_smoke takes demo/performance/**, backend takes tests_backend
and the Python sources. A cache marker is written only by a successful run
of the same key, so a hit proves a job with identical inputs already
passed. scripts/** is deliberately outside every key: infrastructure work
edits it constantly and reuse would never fire.
This is not the path filter from the `changes` job, which stays disabled
on dev on purpose: there the scope is guessed from paths and "green" means
different things, here input equivalence is proven by a hash. And a
release candidate always bumps the version, which is part of the
fingerprint, so its keys are new by construction and the full gate set
still runs before every beta and release.
A waived job is announced with a notice and a run summary line rather than
skipped in silence, and the marker save tolerates a concurrent identical
run instead of reddening the job.
Issue: #208
User-Visible: no
Rule 8 demanded a working S-label from every class A/B commit's issue,
while owner decision #118 sends infrastructure work outside the S1..S8
flow entirely — such an issue has no status label by construction. The
two rules contradicted each other and the machine-checked one won, so
Validate on dev went red on every infrastructure commit (#175, #191,
#202, #206) and the catch-up signal stopped meaning anything. A gate that
is always red is not a gate.
The waiver keys on the diff, not on a permission label: a range with no
class A file at all. An `infra` label could be pinned on a product task
to walk a product commit past the status check; ceasing to touch class A
without ceasing to be infrastructure work is not possible. Issue
existence, open state, `blocked` and fail-closed on an unreachable gh all
still apply, and the waiver prints a visible warning rather than passing
in silence.
Mutation-checked both ways: unwiring the waiver reddens the CLI test,
and letting class A keep the waiver reddens both new tests.
Issue: #207
User-Visible: no
After the mandatory rebase of a published issue branch the pre-push hook
still passes remote_old..local_new, and once the old tip is no longer an
ancestor that range drags in the whole advanced dev history: on #117 it
meant 84 foreign commits and 20 false rule-8 rejections over already
closed issues, leaving --no-verify as the only exit.
The clamp lives in the gate rather than the hook: .githooks/pre-push
carries an executable bit that MCP publication strips (the commit-msg
precedent), so editing it needs an owner-side commit. When the target is
an issue branch and the declared base is not an ancestor of the head, the
base becomes the merge-base with origin/dev. Fast-forward pushes keep
their exact range, every own commit is still judged, and a real violation
in a post-rebase commit still blocks — covered by a scenario test that
goes red without the wiring.
Issue: #190
User-Visible: no
First real run of the gate failed before reaching a single mutant: the clean
run of the golden guard was red on untouched code. demo/golden/policy.mjs
refuses `verify --scenario=...` on purpose — a partial verify is the "make CI
green" loophole the policy exists to close. The gate built to catch dishonest
tests had reached for a dishonest shortcut, and the policy caught it.
capture keeps the whole check: a failed semantic assertion becomes status
error, and goldenRunFailed treats an error as failure in either mode. The scene
carries warmPixelRegion with minPixels 2500 over the receiving half, so a lamp
moved out of reach still fails it — which is exactly what this mutant asserts.
Issue: #85
User-Visible: no
The owner stopped using GitHub Projects. Most of this is wording, but one part
was not: release-prerelease.mjs talked to the Project in code. finishIssues
looked up the project id, listed its items and its Status=Done option, and threw
when an issue was missing from the board — so the first release that closed an
issue would have died on a step with nothing to do with publishing. Found by
reading rather than by releasing, which was luck.
Closing issues stays, and now strips the status label first. That order is not
cosmetic: the invariant that a closed issue carries no status label has broken
twice already, both times because a manual step did it the other way round. The
close-merged job already does it in this order.
The documents now say labels and only labels. The explicit "no longer used"
lines are kept on purpose, in PROCESS.md and next to the code that used to sync:
a decision that vanishes quietly gets reintroduced a month later by someone who
never knew it was made.
Issue: #139
User-Visible: no
Five times in this project a green test meant nothing was checked. The
continuity smoke stayed green after the entire mechanism it guards was cut out.
The golden scene created to protect doorway light was empty — 1,177 warm pixels
against 107,119, all of them icons. The shadow smoke passed while no shadow was
drawn. Each time the test had been written alongside the code, went green at
once, and nobody ever asked whether it could go red.
The gate makes that question routine. Each mutant is a few lines of patch that
reproduce a known breakage, plus the name of the test that must fail on it. A
worktree is patched, the bundle rebuilt, the guard run — and a guard that stays
green fails the gate. Six mutants cover the holes documented in #85; the anchors
are exact strings from today's source, so the registry cannot silently drift —
a unit test that runs with the ordinary suite refuses a stale anchor.
The full run rebuilds the bundle per mutant, so it lives in its own workflow,
before a stable release and on a weekly schedule, not in Validate. The rules for
new tests are written at the top of docs/TESTING.md, and the sixth of them is
the cheapest: an assertion that reads back the property the code just set is
not written at all.
Issue: #85
User-Visible: no
